Christopher Bollyn
DEMOCRACY IS AN ILLUSION
During the massive and sometimes violent demonstrations that marked the G-20 summit in London last week, I noticed a sign that aptly described the fundamental problem facing the West. "Democracy is an Illusion," the sign said. That simple slogan underlines the real problem facing Americans and others who find themselves living in nations that claim to be democratic, and may have once been, but which now clearly serve only the interests of powerful special interest groups while ignoring the will of the people.Having observed many elections and written about the fraudulence of the electronic voting systems in the United States since 2000, I completely agree with the slogan "Democracy is an Illusion." This is, after all, the fundamental deception at the heart of the crisis facing the United States and other western democratic societies. If, on the other hand, we had authentic democratic elections in the United States, with paper ballots openly counted in the polling place, we would not have to suffer such criminal regimes acting against the will of the people.
I have written extensively about this problem since the fall of 2000 when, as a candidate to be an election judge in Cook County, I was introduced to the electronic voting machines that steal our elections. I then wrote an article entitled "The Death of Democracy" that explained how elections in Chicago are rigged through the use of the electronic voting machines used in every voting station and precinct.
With Barack Obama, Americans now have a president and administration from Chicago, the city where I have yet to see a proper election in which the voters are allowed to witness the counting of their votes. Obama was actually elected to the U.S. Senate in one of the most corrupt and rigged elections that I have ever seen. The Republican candidate running against Obama, Jack Ryan, was forced to pull out of the race in June 2004 after the exposure of his involvement in a sex scandal. Ryan's withdrawal left Obama as the only candidate. Two months later, Alan Keyes, who wasn't even from Illinois, stepped in as a visiting candidate from Maryland and ran as a weak fill-in candidate for the former Goldman Sachs employee, Jack Ryan. It came as no surprise that Obama won easily with 70 percent of the uncounted vote, while Keyes received some 27 percent. That is, after all, how it was planned.
"CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN"
As I listened to National Public Radio's coverage of the election results the next day, I was amazed to hear the NPR talking heads go on about Obama as a presidential candidate. What had Obama done, apart from winning a rigged election in which he had been virtually unopposed, that made him presidential? It was very clear from listening to NPR's effusive praise for Obama that he had already been chosen to be a presidential candidate by the people who control NPR, the media, and elections.
As we now know, Obama had been supported and cultivated since 1992 by Bettylu Saltzman, the daughter of Philip Klutznick, Chicago's leading Zionist, to be the first "black" president of the United States. The fact that Obama is no more black than white and has nothing in common with the blacks of the segregated South, was played down during the campaign. Chicago is a segregated city but Obama is not really from Chicago at all. He is the offspring of a mixed-race marriage, a mulatto who was raised by his white grandparents in Hawaii after being abandoned by his Kenyan father. More than anything, however, Obama is a puppet of his Zionist handlers, people like David Axelrod and Rahm Emanuel. This sad state of affairs was painfully evident when Obama, who is used to reading from a script, was asked impromptu questions during his trip to Europe.
Obama was elected on a simple one-word platform: change. The slogan of the Obama campaign was "Change we can believe in." After 8 dismal and disastrous years of war and terror with George W. Bush, "change" was the most obvious choice to define the Obama campaign. After Obama's first trip to Europe, however, it is now quite clear that there will be no significant change in U.S. policy under Obama, unless he follows through on his comment in Strasbourg about the need to improve passenger trains in the United States and starts a serious program with substantial funding to improve the woefully neglected rail infrastructure. Otherwise, everything looks pretty much the same as it did under George W. Bush.
During his first European trip as president, Obama was pushing Bush's disastrous "War on Terror" telling Europeans that they should be afraid of Al Qaida and commit more troops to support the failed mission in Afghanistan. In Prague, Obama promised that the missile defense network, supposedly meant to protect the West from Iran, would go ahead. And throughout the trip he often mentioned Iran, the country to which he had sent a most unusual video broadcast before he left.
In his message to Iran, complete with Farsi subtitles and timed to coincide with the celebration of the Persian New Year, Obama praised the "true greatness of the Iranian people and civilization" and said that the United States wanted to engage Iran and reverse decades of animosity. Ralph R. Reiland wrote about Obama's video appeal and the Iranian reaction in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review on March 30, 2009. Reiland wrote:
Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei dismissed the overture the next morning. "They chant the slogan of change but no change is seen in practice," said Khamenei, sounding not unlike some of Obama's disillusioned supporters in the United States.
"If you are right that change has come, where is that change? What is the sign of that change? Make it clear for us what has changed," Khamenei said.
Bush-basher Michael Moore might well say the same words. What's changed since the days of Bush and Cheney when it was charged that too big a piece of the pie was being grabbed by those who already have too much?
Obama told Joe the Plumber (Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher) that he wanted to "spread the wealth around." True to his word, Obama has done the spreading in record time and in unprecedented amounts.
The only problem for guys like Moore is that the trillions have been flowing for the past two months in exactly the opposite direction of the "change" that Obama promised in his big stadium speeches during the campaign.
No one chanting "Yes we can" was pushing for a change that would stick America's middle-class taxpayers with additional trillions of new debt in order to fill up the coffers of some of the biggest and richest swindlers on Wall Street.
Where's the change, in short, between Bush's TARP-1 and Obama's TARP-2?
Khamenei, similarly, pointed to the lack of change in responding to Obama's video: "Have you released Iranian assets? Have you lifted oppressive sanctions? Have you given up mudslinging and making accusations against the great Iranian nation and its officials? Have you given up your unconditional support for the Zionist regime? Even the language remains unchanged."
It was not only Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and Ralph R. Reiland who were speaking out about the false promises and massive deception coming from the Obama White House. Joseph E. Stiglitz, the Nobel prize-winning economist, wrote an excellent piece, entitled "Obama's Ersatz Capitalism," which was published in the New York Times on April 2 as President Obama met with the world's leaders at the G-20 summit in London.
The Stiglitz piece is very important because it explains the mechanics of the Obama bail-out plan in a way that the average person can understand. Americans taxpayers have already seen more than $180 billion stolen from the national treasury and given to Maurice Greenberg's extremely corrupt company, A.I.G., without any understanding of why A.I.G. should receive such immense sums of public funding in the first place. Even people like Eliot Spitzer are reluctant to mention Greenberg's name in connection with the obscene A.I.G. bail-out. Greenberg is a man that is at the heart of the false-flag terror of 9-11, the War on Terror, and the Great Zionist Rip-Off. Spitzer has paid for taking a stand against Greenberg.
Rather than focus on this incredibly huge transfer of wealth from the American people to private bankers, members of Congress and the controlled media made a big issue out of the bonuses given to A.I.G. managers, who received some $165 million. That's like complaining about giving a $1 dollar tip to the lowly waiter after paying $1,000 to a restaurant for a make-believe meal you never ate.
BANKS WIN - TAXPAYERS LOSE
Most of the $180 billion paid to A.I.G. was actually paid out to private banks, like Goldman Sachs, and others. This is because A.I.G. had insured the "overly complex instruments like collateralized debt obligations," which were at the heart of the economic meltdown. Giving the money to A.I.G. was a way to give huge amounts of taxpayer money to the bankers without making it too terribly obvious.
The people who protested against the bankers of London were those who had not been deceived by the sleight-of-hand trickery in which $180 billion of hard-earned taxpayer money was given to failed bankers who will simply turn around and lend it out – at interest – to the very people who bailed out the banks. The urgent need for real reform and the creation of a real national bank to control money and credit could not be any more obvious.
As Stiglitz wrote:
The Obama administration’s $500 billion or more proposal to deal with America’s ailing banks has been described by some in the financial markets as a win-win-win proposal. Actually, it is a win-win-lose proposal: the banks win, investors win — and taxpayers lose.
What the Obama administration is doing is far worse than nationalization: it is ersatz capitalism, the privatizing of gains and the socializing of losses. It is a “partnership” in which one partner robs the other. And such partnerships — with the private sector in control — have perverse incentives, worse even than the ones that got us into the mess.
Sources:
Bollyn, Christopher, "The Israeli Who Will Run the Obama White House," November 6, 2008
Stiglitz, Joseph E., "Obama’s Ersatz Capitalism," March 31, 2009
Bollyn Research Proved to be Without Error
A European publisher, who is interested in publishing my book about 9-11, commissioned a professional editor to check the facts in my chapter, "The Architecture of Terror: Mapping the Israeli Network Behind 9-11." Last winter, the British fact-checker initially wrote me emails saying that he would send me questions, which I said would be fine. But his questions never came. In response to his last email, I said that I was very glad that he was doing the fact-checking because I thought it would be a great thing to show that I was not making this stuff up. That was the last time I heard from the fact-checker.
Recently, the publisher sent me the results of the fact-checking and praised me for having passed with flying colors. The fact-checker had investigated some 95 points in the chapter and had not found a single error in fact. For those who are interested in the details you can read the point-by-point analysis below.
I am publishing this analysis to show two things:
1. That my work has a very high degree of accuracy and verifiabilty. I don't write anything that I have not found to be true and verifiable. That my most contentious chapter went through a rigorous fact-checker's mill without losing a single sentence could stand as proof.
2. This is the kind of fact-checking that is an essential part of the process of preparing my book for publication. Having written hundreds of articles about 9-11 since September 2001, I have to go through each and every one to make sure that every fact is verifiable and correct. I will probably have to use footnotes for the book. Every claim and statement must be based on a reputable source.
Because my thesis is bound to spark some controversy, I am doing my utmost to check and validate every fact and claim presented in the text. When the publisher sent me the results he said that I should be proud. I honestly did not quite understand what that meant; that I should be proud that I had not lied? Of course all the statements in my articles are true - they wouldn't be there if they weren't. Only after going through my response to the fact-checker did I understand what he meant: My facts were unassailable.
The following is the fact-checker's analysis of my chapter and my responses to his questions. I try to set off his questions and comments from my responses, which are preceded by BOLLYN RESPONDS:
The Fact-Checker Begins:
Point 1.
Ariel Sharon's statement: "I want to tell you something very clear. Don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America and the Americans know it."
-Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to Foreign Minister Shimon Peres, October 2001
ALLEGEDLY ON KOL YISRAEL RADIO, OCTOBER 3RD 2001, THOUGH CAN FIND NO REPORT OF THIS IN A NATIONAL NEWSPAPER.
BOLLYN RESPONDS: This statement was reported to have been broadcast on the Hebrew-language Kol Yisrael radio in Israel. It then made its way into print. The best source I know of is The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, a highly-respected magazine read throughout the world published in Washington D.C. by former U.S. diplomats:
The Sharon quote was published in The Washington Report on November 2001, page 114, under a section entitled "American Educational Trust - Publishers’ Page":
Israel’s Rogue Prime Minister…
We’re not accustomed to hearing a spade called a spade when it comes to Israel—but it’s something we could get used to. Of course, what hasn’t yet made it into the American media is the account on Hebrew-language Israel radio (Kol Yisrael), as relayed Oct. 3 by IAP News, of an “acrimonious argument” between Sharon and his foreign minister, Shimon Peres, at the previous Wednesday’s weekly cabinet meeting. According to the report, Peres warned Sharon against refusing to heed continued American requests for a cease-fire, saying Sharon’s rejections would endanger Israeli interests and…
“Turn the U.S. Against Us.”
Lashing back at Peres, a furious Sharon then reportedly shouted, “Every time we do something you tell me Americans will do this and do that. I want to tell you something very clear: don’t worry about American pressure on Israel, [because] we, the Jewish people, control America, and…
The Americans Know It.”
Well, you learn something new every day. Who would have thought that Ariel Sharon might be a closet anti-Semite? Doesn’t he know we don’t talk that way in this country? Apparently Peres and the other cabinet ministers do, though, for they were quick to warn Sharon against making such a statement in public, because “it would cause us…
“A Public Relations Disaster.”
Source: http://www.wrmea.com/archives/november01/0111114.html
Point 4.
Netanyahu – ‘It’s very good. Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy.'
YES: Bennet, James, 'Spilled Blood is Seen as Bond That Draws 2 Nations Closer',
New York Times, September 12, 2001,
"We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq."
Benjamin Netanyahu, as quoted in Ma'ariv, April 16, 2008
SOURCE, PLEASE
BOLLYN RESPONDS: This was reported in Ha'aretz on April 16, 2008. Ma'ariv is a Hebrew-language paper in Israel:
Report: Netanyahu says 9/11 terror attacks good for Israel
By Haaretz Service and Reuters
Last update - 00:00 16/04/2008
The Israeli newspaper Ma'ariv on Wednesday reported that Likud leader Benjamin Netanyahu told an audience at Bar Ilan university that the September 11, 2001 terror attacks had been beneficial for Israel.
"We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq," Ma'ariv quoted the former prime minister as saying. He reportedly added that these events "swung American public opinion in our favor."
Netanyahu reportedly made the comments during a conference at Bar-Ilan University on the division of Jerusalem as part of a peace deal with the Palestinians.
Source: http://haaretz.com/hasen/spages/975574.html
Point 10.
Asst. Attorney General Michael Chertoff ‘devoted Zionist’, also ‘2 dedicated Zionists-cum-federal judges’, Alvin K.Hellerstein and Michael B. Mukasey have overseen virtually all the litigation.
AS I'VE STATED BELOW, ENCYCLOPEDIAS LIST AT LEAST 4 VARIETIES OF ZIONIST, FROM LIBERAL THROUGH TO NATIONALIST. AT NO POINT DOES CB DRAW ANY DISTINCTION - SO I CONCLUDE THIS IS ROUGHLY ON THE LEVEL OF EMOTIVE BLANKET LABELLING, RATHER LIKE EQUATING THE WORD 'MUSLIM' WITH 'FUNDAMENTALIST' OR 'TERRORIST'. PLEASE SEE NOTE BELOW.
BOLLYN RESPONDS: Zionism is the political movement to establish and maintain an independent Jewish state; a racially oriented state (or ghetto fortress) in which non-Jews are discriminated against and do not receive the same rights or privileges as Jews. Supporters of this Jewish apartheid-like state are Zionists, by definition. The three individuals named above, i.e. Chertoff, Hellerstein, and Mukasey, are all known members of Zionist organizations and have family members from or in Israel. A devoted or dedicated Zionist is a person who is personally invested in the state of Israel as these men are. To equate describing a person as "a devoted Zionist" with the "emotive blanket labelling" of calling a person a Muslim terrorist is not accurate. If a person is an active, contributing, and long-time Zionist, as these three men are, it is not at all unfair to call them 'devoted' or 'dedicated' Zionists. I would not make such statements without showing the background of the people being described.
Point 11.
Michael Goff, P-Tech and Guardium
LINK TAKES ME TO MARSHA GOFF, AND ONLY MENTIONS GUARDIUM
– ‘Young Zionist lawyer from Worcester, Massachusetts’. Father and Grandfather members of B’nai B’rith –
SOURCE?
BOLLYN RESPONDS: Here is the information that I found on Michael Goff's website in April 2005:
Here is what Michael Goff's website says about his work there:
Michael was marketing manager at Ptech, Inc., a leading provider of business process modeling, design and development software. In this capacity, Michael managed various marketing programs and activities including public relations, direct mail, Web development, collateral, trade shows and seminars. Additionally, Michael worked closely with the Ptech sales organization to perform competitive analysis as well as manage lead tracking and fulfillment activities.
When Michael first joined Ptech, he shared responsibilities between marketing and information systems for the company. As information systems manager, Michael handled design, deployment and management of its Windows and Macintosh, data, and voice networks. As part of this effort, Michael developed Lotus Notes-based systems for sales and marketing lead tracking and IS service and support requests. Michael also performed employee training and handled all procurement for software, systems and peripherals.
See: http://www.goffpr.com/about.asp
Shortly after I published this information the Goff's changed their website to remove Michael's name and work history with Ptech.
Source: http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=68484
BOLLYN RESPONDS: I found that Goff's father and grandfather were highest-level freemasons and members of B'nai B'rith in their obituaries:
Michael S. Goff's father is Allan S. Goff who passed away in 1995:
Worcester Telegram & Gazette (MA) - September 22, 1995
Deceased Name: ALLAN S. GOFF, 51
PAXTON - Allan S. Goff, 51, of 32 Crowningshield Drive, formerly of Worcester, a certified public accountant and longtime businessman, died yesterday at home after a brief struggle with cancer.
He leaves his wife of 30 years, Nancy (Gore) Goff; two sons, Michael S. Goff of Holliston and Douglas A. Goff of New Orleans; a daughter, Allison L. Goff of Manchester, N.H.; and a brother, Jacob Goff in California. He was born in Worcester, son of Samuel and Dorothy (Shevitz) Goff. He graduated from Worcester Academy in 1961 and Bentley College in 1965.
Mr. Goff was a certified public accountant. He was a co-managing partner of Goff, Carlin & Cagan, founded by his father in 1928. He was a member of Temple Emanuel, and was vice president of finance and a board director of the temple. He was a member of Commonweath Lodge of B'nai B'rith, Level Lodge of Masons and was a 32nd-degree Mason. He was a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Massachusetts Society of Certified Public Accountants. He was former chairman of the certified public accountants' division of United Way of Central Massachusetts.
Funeral services will be held at 10 a.m. Sunday in Temple Emanuel, 280 May St. Burial will be in B'nai B'rith Cemetery. A memorial observance will be held through Tuesday evening at the residence. In lieu of flowers, memorial contributions may be made to Temple Emanuel, 280 May St., Worcester, 01602. Perlman Funeral Home, 1026 Main St., is directing arrangements.
Worcester Telegram & Gazette (MA)
Date: September 22, 1995
Copyright (c) 1995 Worcester Telegram & Gazette Corp.
And his Grandfather Samuel Goff:
PAXTON - Samuel Goff, 92, of 32 Crowningshield Drive died yesterday in his home after a long illness.
His wife, Dorothy (Shevitz) Goff, died in 1977. He leaves two sons, Allan S. Goff of Paxton, with whom he made his home, and Jacob I. Goff of Hemet, Calif.; a sister, Lillian Rappaport of Worcester; five grandchildren, and two great-grandchildren. He was born in Russia, son of Simon and Dora (Miller) Goff, and lived in Worcester 65 years before moving to Paxton 15 years ago.
Mr. Goff graduated from Classical High School in Worcester and from Bentley College in 1923.
He was a certified public accountant, and was a senior partner of Goff, Carlin and Cagan until 1989 when he became the firm's senior consultant. He founded Samuel Goff and Co. in 1923, and was one of the oldest practicing certified public accountants in Massachusetts.
Mr. Goff was a founder and a member of Temple Emanuel, a member of Worcester Lodge 600, B'nai Brith, and the American Institute and Massachusetts Society of Certified Public Accountants. He was a 32nd degree Mason and a member of Level Lodge of Masons.
Funeral services will be at 1 p.m. tomorrow in Temple Emanuel, 280 Main St., Worcester, with Rabbi James L. Simon and Cantor Sheri Blum officiating. Burial will be in B'nai Brith Cemetery, Worcester. Memorial week will be observed through Sunday evening at the home of Mr. and Mrs. Allan F. Goff, 32 Crowningshield Drive. Memorial donations may be made to Thrombosis Reseach/Cardiology, University of Massachusetts Hospital, 55 Lake Ave., North, Worcester 01655. Perlman Funeral Home, 1026 Main St., Worcester, is directing arrangements.
Copyright (c) 1992 Worcester Telegram & Gazette Corp.
Question:
PTECH - ‘Allegedly Arab owned and Saudi financed’.
CERTAINLY THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO IS ONE OUSSAMA ZIADE, AND THE VP AND CHIEF SCIENTIST IS MR. IBRAHIM HUSSEIN.
Goff also working for Guardium, ‘run by Israeli intelligence officers’.
TO LOOK AT CURRENT LEADERSHIP, INCORRECT. TO LOOK AT FUNDING, VERITAS http://www.veritasvc.com/team.asp HAS I.I. LINKS, HOWEVER, GUARDIUM HAS FIVE SEPARATE INVESTORS. AMONG OTHER INVESTORS, STAGE ONE SEEMS TO HAVE NOTHING MORE THAN A LIEUTENANT COLONEL IN THE RESERVES OF THE IDF, AND THE CEDAR FUND HAS NOTHING MORE THAN A LEADER WHO ONCE SERVED IN THE ISRAELI NAVY.
¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬
BOLLYN RESPONDS: The role of Israeli military intelligence in the creation of Guardium is dealt with in detail in other chapters of the book. To understand Guardium's connection to the Israeli military one need only look at the people who founded the company, e.g. Gil Zaphrir, a.k.a. Zafrir, an Israeli colonel in charge of research and development for the Israeli air force.
Point 12.
PTECH enterprise software, ‘has spy, surveillance, and intervention capabilities, according to those who know about it.’
CB FOR SOURCE.
BOLLYN RESPONDS: Here is a good source for this comment from Indira Singh:
It was possible that there was an alternate command and control system… could you technically use P-Tech software to do the surveillance and intervention? Well, gosh, yes, that’s exactly what I was planning on using it for in one of the largest banks in the world. It’s not a problem. So if someone wants to make it their thesis, I’ve no problem with that, however, I can’t say for sure that was going on because I don’t have direct firsthand knowledge of that, no one has told me and offered me proof of that.
Source: Our World In Balance, The Story of Indira Singh, April 27, 2005
Question:
GUARDIUM ‘a company that is a branch of the research and development department for the Israeli airforce.’
ON VIRYANET WEBSITE, IT IS RATHER REFERRED TO AS A 'PRIVATELY HELD COMPANY THAT DEVELOPS AND DELIVERS INNOVATIVE DATABASE SECURITY SOLUTIONS' SEE: http://www.viryanet.com/company/management/. AFTER 1/2 HOUR'S TRAWLING, I CAN NOTHING TO SUPPORT THIS. ONE TO CHECK WITH CB?
BOLLYN RESPONDS: Guardium was spun-off in America from Log-On in Israel. Log-On was founded by the head programmers from Israeli navy, army, and air force, namely, Major Gil Migdan, Joseph Segev, Danny Zeitouny, and Col. Gil Zaphrir (see P. 13 below). With these people behind the company it is fair to call it a branch of R&D for Israeli airforce.
Point 13.
One of the founders Amit Yoran, who became manager of computer network security for the Pentagon.’
I HAVE SEEN, FROM GUARDIUM WEBSITE, THAT HE JOINED THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN 2005, BUT CANNOT SEE HIM LISTED AS A FOUNDER. Another article would seem to confirm this: (http://www.allbusiness.com/technology/software-services-applications-software-makers/5037865-1.html)
Also a spin-off of LOG-ON SOFTWARE, Israeli military intelligence company based in Ranat Gan, Israel.’ Certainly has strong links to Israeli Military, (SEE: http://www.log-on.com/Company/Management/tabid/53/Default.aspx, though presents itself - plausibly - as a general software company. (SEE: http://www.log-on.com/Home/tabid/36/Default.aspx)
Founders of LOG-ON:
Major Gil Migdan and Joseph Segev, former head programmer and telecommunications officer of Israeli navy. Also Vice-President Danny Zeitouny, head of logistics programming for Israeli military.
CORRECT: WWW.LOG-ON.COM
Another director, Gil Zaphrir (Zafrir), Israeli colonel in charge of research and development for Israeli air force.
CORRECT: http://www.veritasvc.com/team.asp#gill
Amit Yoram – appointed by GWB as cyber-chief
THIS IS CORRECT
responsible for coordinating nation’s activities on cyber security.
THIS IS CORRECT. THOUGH WAS HE A FOUNDER OF LOG-ON?
Before, responsible for managing security infrastructure in 40 countries.
SEEMS CORRECT, SEE: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/cyberwar/interviews/yoran.html
Before working in private sector, Network Security manager at department of defence, maintaining operation at Pentagon’s network. Designed security architecture for Pentagon. Also, Director of Vulnerability Assessment and assistance program for U.S. department of Defence Computer Emergency Response Team. CORRECT (SEE-http://www.informationweek.com/news/management/interviews/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=17603406
At the time Goff was at P-TECH, Yoran was network Security Manager at Department of Defence designing computer security for the Pentagon.
SEE: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mgoff, for evidence he worked there. However, I am unable to ascertain the year.
FOR A LUCID ARTICLE ON POSSIBLE DANGERS RE. ISRAELI SOFTWARE SPYING, SEE http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2002/tc20021217_3779.htm
Point 14.
INDIRA SINGH, 9/11 Citizens’ Commision
‘If anyone was in a position to know… that there was a window of opportunity or to insert software or to change anything… it would have been Ptech along with MITRE’.
FOR INDIRA SINGH'S DOUBTS RE. PTECH, SEE: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8228336760154277932
THOUGH HER DOUBTS DO NOT SEEM TO PERTAIN TO MOSSAD INVOLVEMENT, BUT AL QAEDA, AND A SUBSEQUENT COVER-UP. AND YES, THIS ABOVE QUOTE IS ON THE ABOVE LINK.
Point 15.
Some of the key Israeli-run companies linked to Guardium are Amdocs, ViryaNet, Nice Systems, and CreoScitex.
TO QUERY WITH CB - IN WHAT WAY LINKED?
BOLLYN RESPONDS: These companies are all linked by sharing personnel. That is to say that ViryaNet personnel went to Guardium, Log-On people went to Guardium, Veritas people went to Guardium, Amdocs people went to ViryaNet and Nice Systems, etc. This is the revolving door of the Israeli military elite among their companies in the United States. The number of players is small so you see the same names pop up time and time again. The companies are all funded by the same Mossad funding arms. This is a subject I have written extensively about in other articles. These connections will become clear when reading the material from beginning to end.
Question:
Like Guardium, these companies are all run by senior officers of Israeli military intelligence.
CANNOT FIND INFO ON AMDOCS, HOWEVER, VIRYANET HAS ON ITS BOARD AVIE ORADIA (ISRAEL SECURITY AUTHORITY) AND NATI PERRY (ISRAELI AIRFORCE 1984-1997)
LINK: http://www.viryanet.com/company/board-of-directors
WHILE THE LEADERSHIP INCLUDES AVIRAN HINENZON (AT ONE POINT WORKED FOR ISRAELI MINISTRY OF DEFENCE - link, http://www.viryanet.com/company/management/
Nice systems is dealt with above) CREOSCITEX EMPLOYED, TILL 3/2001, SHLOMO SHAMIR,
Nice Systems headed from April 2001 (PRESIDENT FROM 2005, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER FROM 2001) by Brigadier General Shlomo Shamir...
Point 16.
‘who built and led the planning division in the IDF headquarters and served as Israel’s military attache to Germany’.CORRECT - SEE: WWW.NICE.COM
Israeli employees of Nice Systems and Amdocs caught trying to infiltrate DEA TO CHECK WITH CB - I COULD ONLY FIND THIS MENTIONED ON A PRIVATE WEBSITE.
BOLLYN RESPONDS: This is material taken from the leaked D.E.A. document about the Israeli spy rings composed of fake art students. This material has not been published in the mainstream press but is a significant part of investigation of the Israeli "art student" ring of 2000-2001. It has not been found to be false.
Point 17.
Amit Yoran chief executive of Riptech, and managed to hack into utilities’ power networks, in Europe.
NOT SURE ABOUT EUROPE, BUT HIS 'ETHICAL HACKING' ACTIVITIES MENTIONED IN L.A. TIMES
SEE: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-6910441.html
RIPTECH ‘founded by Elad and Amit Yoran, two Israeli West Point graduates who claim years of security experience..’ Washington Times, December 11th, 2000.
THIS SEEMS CORRECT
SEE: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/mmedia/washtech/yoran3.htm
‘Amit Yoran reportedly helped design the Pentagon’s security architecture.’
THIS TOO SEEMS CORRECT, REPORTED http://www.computerworld.com/printthis/2003/0,4814,84988,00.html
Point 18.
ELAD YORAN
CHECK – when did he start working for Riptech, 2001 or 1999? I can only find info. that Riptech was founded in 1998, and that EY's involvement started in March 2001.
Before becoming a director of Guardium, for example, Col. Gill Zafrir was "actively managing the funds of Veritas," which funded Guardium. Prior to joining Veritas in 1999, Col. Zaphrir "headed the research and development department of the Israel Air Force."
THIS SEEMS CORRECT:
SEE: http://www.veritasvc.com/team.asp#gill
Nice Systems, US subsidiary of Israeli company with same name, headed by Brig. Gen. Shlomo Shamir from April 2001.
CORRECT:
SEE: http://www.nice.com/about/management/shlomo_shamir.php
That Brig. Gen. Shamir ‘built and led the planning division in the IDF headquarters, and served as Israel’s military attache to Germany until 1994, when he began working at Scitex American Corp, which he headed from 1997, and which became Creoscitex America inc.’
CORRECT
SEE: http://people.forbes.com/profile/shlomo-shamir/57661
Avinoam Naor Aharonovich, one of the founders of Amdocs, President and CEO of Amdocs. Management from 1995-2002.
CORRECT
SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amdocs
Elad Yoran held similar dual positions at Broadview International and Riptech.
I HAVE A RECORD OF HIS HAVING WORKED AT BROADVIEW 'PRIOR TO RIPTECH', BUT NOTHING MORE
http://www.fundingpost.com/venturefund/venture-fund-profile.asp?fund=220
Feb. 2001 – was Amit Yoran chief executive at Riptech?
YES SEE: http://www.symantec.com/press/2002/n020717b.html
Was Riptech founded by Elad and Amit Yoran? YES.
Was Elad vice president with Broadview prior to joining Riptech? YES http://www.fundingpost.com/venturefund/venture-fund-profile.asp?fund=220
Also important – Zaphrir ‘headed the research and development department of the Israel Air Force. Then from 1999, ‘actively managing the funds of Veritas’ (BUSINESS WEEK), and now a director of Guardium. Gil Zafrir (spelling Zaphrir)'actively managing funds of Veritas, and now a director of Guardium.
I have him down as a partner at Veritas, and a board member at Guardium
SEE: http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Zafrir_Gill_1106652167.aspx
MORE ON ELAD YORAN – founder of similar funding company called SECURITY GROWTH PARTNERS (SGP) YES
Point 19.
‘Mr.Y also advises govt. and infrastructure organisations on security and business risk matters.’
YES - http://www.securitygrowth.com/leadership.asp
'ILAN YURAN IS ANOTHER ISRAELI SPELLING OF THE SAME NAME'
ON THE CONTRARY, THE HEBREW NAME WEBSITE SAYS THAT ILAN IS ANOTHER SPELLING OF ELAN - ELAD SEEMS TO HAVE A TOTALLY DIFFERENT MEANING. Given this, what is CB's point here?
BOLLYN RESPONDS: The fact-checker has misread what I wrote here. I am mentioning Ilan Juran, not Yuran. The matter is not about the first name but the surname. This is the paragraph in question:
The list of Elad Yoran's advisors and partners at SGP is very interesting. It includes his brother Amit Yoran, of course, and previously included another Israeli named Ilan Juran, which is another spelling of the same Israeli name.
Ilan Juran works at the Polytechnic University in Brooklyn, New York. Juran is director of the US-Israel Civil Infrastructure Security Program, an initiative of the Urban Utility Center, which he is "executive director" of. Juran's program is "designed to foster collaboration, as well as knowledge and technology sharing, between the U.S. and Israel governments and critical infrastructure organizations."
Question: IY director of the US-Israel Civil Infrastructure security program ‘designed to foster collaboration, as well as knowledge and technology sharing, between the U.S. and Israel governments and critical infrastructure organisations.’
CERTAINLY HEAD OF ITS PARENT ORGANISATION - listed as ED of Urban Utility Center SEE: http://uuc1.poly.edu/members.cfm
said on one Islamic website to be parent company of the programme.
Another adviser at SGP, a co-founder of Riptech, Tim Belcher
CORRECT, RE. RIPTECH. SEE: http://www.netwitness.com/company/managementteam.aspx
and SGP http://www.securitygrowth.com/advisors.asp
Mr. Belcher has also conducted security assessments of some of the nation’s most critical infrastructure components, including the Federal Aviation Administration’s Air Traffic Control Network. He has also worked with government organizations such as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the National Reconnaissance Office, the Office of the Secretary of Defense, and Space and Naval Warfare Command.
CORRECT - SEE: http://www.securitygrowth.com/advisors.asp
JEREMY KROLL
Managing director of Marsh Kroll
Yes, from 2005-2007. Before that 2000-2002 director of operations and eventually general manager of Kroll's fast growing information security group. 2002-2005, head of marketing and sales for Kroll - http://www.kroll.com/services/ifai/professionals/jeremykroll/
and also on the board at SGP.
CORRECT - SEE: http://www.securitygrowth.com/advisors.asp
Point 20.
Marsh Kroll, a division of Marsh and McLennan Co.
SINCE 2004
SEE: http://www.mmc.com/news/pressReleases_196.php
KROLL SECURITY AT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER
Kroll Associates was responsible for "revamping security at the World Trade Center after the 1993 terrorist bombing," Douglas Frantz of the New York Times reported in 1994.
CORRECT - SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerome_Hauer
This is a crucial point because those who controlled security at the WTC are prime suspects in the demolition of the twin towers.
I THOUGHT THE PRIME SUSPECT REMAINED AL QAEDA, AND THAT KROLL ARE ONLY SUSPECTS AMONG - TO USE WIKIPEDIA'S UNFLATTERING PHRASE - 'CONSPIRACY THEORISTS', and the 'demolition' of the twin towers remains a hotly contested theory. Several times in this article, CB in fact seems to refer to ideas which are - openly - highly debatable, controversial, inconclusive and unproven, and then to refer to them as though they are established facts. Whether this is self-deceptive or actively misleading is open to question.
It was directly into the computer room of Marsh (Kroll) USA in the North Tower that the first plane struck, or was guided, on 9-11.
I HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO VERIFY THIS, THOUGH AS FAR AS I CAN SEE, MARSH KROLL WERE CERTAINLY ON FLOORS 93-100 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tenants_in_One_World_Trade_Center
AND THE PLANE, REPUTEDLY, HIT THE 99TH FLOOR.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1340614/Worker-watched-brother's-office-as-plane-struck.html
ALSO, SEE: 9/11 Commission report - AAF 11 cut through floors 93-99. Marsh Kroll, floors 93-100.
Point 21.
Testimony from Larry Silverstein and physical evidence indicate WTC 7 was demolished with explosives and Thermite.
THE WORD 'TESTIMONY' HERE IS MISLEADING, MAKING THIS SOUND FAR MORE SUBSTANTIAL THAN IT IS. WHAT IS PRESUMABLY REFERS TO IS SILVERSTEIN'S COMMENT ON PUBLIC SERVICE BROADCASTING THAT HE GAVE INSTRUCTIONS TO THE FIRE BRIGADE TO 'PULL IT' WHEN HE SAW THAT WTC7 WAS UNSAVABLE.
THE PROBLEMS WITH THIS ARE OBVIOUS. FIRSTLY, THIS HAS SINCE BEEN ESTABLISHED AS A FIRE BRIGADE TERM MEANING 'TO PULL THE FIRE BRIGADE OUT', AND IS REINFORCED BY BLANCHARD'S (SEE NEXT POINT FOR WEBSITE) POINT BELOW THAT HE HAS NEVER HEARD THE EXPRESSION 'PULL IT' IN DEMOLITION WORK. QUITE APART FROM THIS, ARE WE EXPECTED TO BELIEVE THAT SILVERSTEIN, WHO CB AND OTHERS BELIEVE WERE INVOLVED IN WHATEVER PLOT TOOK PLACE, WOULD MAKE SUCH A SCANDALOUS ADMISSION ON PBS? OR IS IT MORE LIKELY THAT HE ADMITTED HE SIMPLY GAVE INSTRUCTIONS TO THE FIREMEN NOT TO CONTINUE WITH WHAT SEEMED A FRUITLESS OPERATION? I THINK WE CAN AGREE ON WHAT IS MORE LIKELY. THE FACT THAT THIS HAS BEEN SKATED OVER BY CB IS, I THINK, RATHER WORRYING, AND A SIGNIFICANT FLAW IN THE ARTICLE, PARTICULARLY AS THIS HIGHLY UNLIKELY THEORY BECOMES 'EVIDENTLY' IN THE NEXT LINE. FOR A REFUTATION OF THE DEMOLITION CLAIMS, SEE:
http://www.jod911.com/WTC%20COLLAPSE%20STUDY%20BBlanchard%208-8-06.pdf
Getting control of WTC security something Israeli intelligence had ‘actively sought’ since 1987.
AGAIN, THIS IS OPEN TO QUESTION - CERTAINLY ISRAELI FIRMS HAVE. BUT IS THIS THE SAME THING?
Isser Harrel – Shin Bet (?) 1948-1952 and Mossad 1947-1963. Positions?
Head of Mossad 1952, head of Shin Bet 1948 - 1952.
9/11 ‘a plan that was first articulated by Isser Harel in 1979’.
THIS MAKES IT SOUND AS THOUGH HE WAS ARTICULATING HIS OWN PLAN, PLEASE SEE BELOW.
‘Both Haganah and Irgun involved in the terror bombings of the King David Hotel’.
Irgun, yes. Haganah, yes.
SEE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haganah
Harel was ‘evidently involved’.
CERTAINLY HAREL WAS A MEMBER OF HAGANAH http://www.shabak.gov.il/English/History/heads/Pages/IsserHarel.aspx
BUT IS THERE ANY 'EVIDENT' INVOLVEMENT IN THIS? AGAIN, ONE HAS TO WATCH OUT FOR THAT WORD 'EVIDENTLY' - I'M AFRAID, REPEATEDLY A MISLEADING ONE IN THIS ARTICLE.
Point 22.
Prediction to Michael D.Evans, ‘an American Zionist missionary’. ‘a hard line Zionist Jew who poses as a Christian’.
ONE TO CHECK UP WITH CB. I CAN FIND NO EVIDENCE THAT MICHAEL D.EVANS IS A HARD LINE ZIONIST JEW (AND THE SURNAME 'EVANS' WOULD HARDLY SUGGEST IT). IS HE NOT RATHER A CHRISTIAN EVANGELIST WHO RATHER RABIDLY SUPPORTS THE STATE OF ISRAEL - AS INDEED DO MANY NON-JEWISH AMERICANS?
BOLLYN RESPONDS: Here I am assuming that the reader has read the previous chapter about "America The Target." The fact-checker says that he "can find no evidence that Michael D Evans is a hard line Zionist Jew" but his source is the same as mine – it is the Evans interview from www.beliefnet.com
In an earlier chapter of the book I discuss Evan's Jewish roots. The fact that he supported and worked with people like Menachem Begin show his Zionist credentials:
Michael D. Evans certainly does not represent Christians or Christianity. He is a Zionist wolf in disguise. Evans' only mission is to deceive Christians into supporting the most extreme and militant Zionist agenda.
In a 2004 interview, Evans claims that his "mother's grandfather was burned to death in his synagogue in Minsk, Russia." He also says that he was subjected to anti-Semitic abuse by Catholics growing up in Massachusetts.
Evans was asked: Do you think your mission now has to do with the fact that you are Jewish?
"One-hundred percent," was Evans' response.
Source: http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=114012
The original source on Evans is from page 3 of the same source that Ashenden found:
"Is America in Bible Prophecy?" (An interview with Michael D. Evans)
http://www.beliefnet.com/Faiths/Christianity/End-Times/Is-America-In-Bible-Prophecy.aspx?p=3
My mother's grandfather was burned to death in his synagogue in Minsk Russia. The Russian Orthodox Church members boarded it up and burned the whole congregation alive and wrote "Christ-killers" on the walls as they burned it to death. Her aunts and uncles were burned to death in Auschwitz and called "Christ-killers" during that period of time. My mother survived and moved to America, but as a child, I pushed her grocery cart to the grocery store. Catholics and others would drive by in their cars and throw rocks at me and my mother, calling her a "kike" a "Jew witch," a "Christ-killer."
This was in the 1950s in Massachusetts. I was beat up for being a Jew. I was told as a little child, "You murdered Christ." I heard that over and over, by Christians who were anti-Semites.
My father would go get drunk every Friday night at the Twilight Café, and he'd come home and beat up my mother and accuse her of being a whore. She'd wear sunglasses a lot because she'd have black eyes. And then he'd go to church Sunday and sing "Amazing Grace." And haul us to church. And beat us with extension chords if we didn't have devotions. Now six of my brothers and sisters will not enter a church because of this. My mother hardened her heart to the Gospel of Jesus Christ because of this.
Question:
Harel ‘Phallic symbol’
– why shouldn’t Harel have gleaned this as an Arab plan from intelligence? If Michael D.Evans if really a 'hard line' Zionist, why would he have revealed such a compromising detail from the founder of Israeli intelligence in an easily accessed interview? If indeed, as David Duke's website has put it, 'Mossad prides itself on "infiltrating every sizable militant Palestinian and Arab organization on earth"' it is surely more likely that Harel simply knew his stuff re.the Arabs, and had heard whisperings. To skip from such a tenuous hypothesis to the word 'evidently' in next line again seems either self-deceiving, or an attempt to railroad the reader. The Michael D.Evans piece can be found at http://www.beliefnet.com/Faiths/Christianity/End-Times/Is-America-In-Bible-Prophecy.aspx
‘a team of senior Israeli intelligence agents, men who had worked directly under Isser Harel for decades, obtained the security contract from Port Authority of New York, who owned and operated the World Trade Center.’
THIS WOULD SEEM CORRECT: SEE WASHINGTON POST ARTICLE ONLINE AT http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-1316378.html
HOWEVER, AND THIS IS KEY: Edward J. O'Sullivan also said that the Port Authority had solicited Israeli firms for advice on the Port Authority's security, 'because of that country's expertise in dealing with security problems'. SEE: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-1316378.html
In other words: IS THERE SOMETHING SINISTER ABOUT THE MOSSAD INVOLVEMENT IN THE PA'S SECURITY, OR WERE THESE JUST EX-AGENTS EXPLOITING, IN THE BEST WAY THEY COULD, WHAT THEY HAD BEEN TRAINED TO DO BETTER THAN ANYONE ELSE? AND WHO WENT TO WHOM?
‘was evidently planned decades in advance’.
AGAIN, 'EVIDENTLY', WHEN 'CONCEIVABLY' IS THE MORE ACCURATE WORD.
Port authorities also managed operations at the airports.
CORRECT: http://www.panynj.gov/
Prior to complex being leased to Larry Silverstein in late July 2001.
ACCORDING TO WIKIPEDIA, YES. BUT ACCORDING TO NYTIMES, THE DATE WAS APRIL 27TH (SEE:
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D01E3DA1339F934A15757C0A9679C8B63
BOLLYN RESPONDS: It is a well-documented fact that Silverstein signed the lease, and closed the deal on the World Trade Center, on July 24, 2001. It was reported in the New York Post on July 25, 2001 in an article entitled "Signed, Sealed and Delivered" and in Newsday on the same day under the headline "World Trade Center $3.2 B lease signed." The haggling over the lease with other bidders had gone on a long time and then, after the Vornado realty company left the negotiations, it took until July 24 to close the deal.
Point 23.
Contract with Attwell security cancelled after the PA learned that Attwell was headed by Avraham Shalom Ben Dor. ‘aka Avraham Shalom or Bendor’.
THIS IS CORRECT: SEE WASHINGTON POST ARTICLE ONLINE AT http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-1316378.html
Point 24.
Edward J. O'Sullivan, director of the office of special plans at the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, simply said that the contract with Atwell Security of Tel Aviv had been terminated because "we are no longer satisfied with the agreement," the Washington Post reported in April 1987.
(DITTO)
O’Sullivan told him PA’s legal office had told him not to comment. However, O’S said he acted after reporter enquired about contract, and Bendor acknowledged he was also Avraham Shalom.
(CORRECT: SEE SAME WASHINGTON POST ARTICLE).
The executives running the Port Authority in 1987 and the mayor and his first deputy,
All Zionist Jews (?????) KOCH HIMSELF HAS TAKEN ISSUE WITH THIS LABEL, DESCRIBING THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE ORIGINAL ZIONISTS AND THE MODIFIED ZIONISTS (OR SUPPORTERS OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL) - HIS DEFINITION HERE SEEMS FAIRLY LUCID AND RESTRAINED.
http://www.nypress.com/19/35/news&columns/opinion.cfm
IT SEEMS ONCE AGAIN THAT IN THIS ARTICLE 'ZIONIST' IS BEING USED IMPRECISELY, AND WITHOUT DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN DIFFERING TYPES OF ZIONISM (RELIGIOUS, NATIONALIST AND LIBERAL, TO NAME BUT THREE KINDS).
Point 25.
…certainly must have been aware of the PA decision to hire a company run by a senior Mossad agent to provide security for the airports, ports, commuter trains, and World Trade Center under its authority. The people who made the decision to give the security contract to Avraham Bendor's Atwell Security of Tel Aviv certainly must have known that Zvi Malkin was a senior Mossad agent; they had negotiated with him, after all.
IT WOULD SEEM INDEED THAT ZVI MALKIN DID OPERATE AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR ATWELL.
SEE WASHINGTON POST http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-1316378.html
Executive director of PA in 1985
(YES)
Stephen Berger. Berger, who is Jewish, is a membor of the board of NY’s citizens budget commission with fellow Zionist Jews Larry Silversterstein and Felix Rohatyn.
CORRECT THAT THEY SERVE ON THE BOARD -
http://cityfile.com/lists/citizens-budget-commission-board
ZIONISTS?
BOLLYN RESPONDS: Larry Silverstein was national chairman of the United Jewish Appeal (UJA) which is the main fundraiser for Israel in the United States. Felix Rohatyn has played similar roles in his support of Israel.
SB therefore executive director of PA when Atwell, a ‘Mossad company’, received the security contract.
SB WAS ED AT PA FROM 1985-1990 http://www.nyhealthcarecommission.org/members/bios/berger.htm
SO YES.
Point 26.
‘It is hard to imagine that Brezenoff, whose Yiddish-speaking grandparents immigrated to the US from Russia and Austria, was unaware of the deal to give the security contract to Atwell security of Tel Aviv.’
I THINK WE CAN BOTH AGREE, THIS SENTENCE DOES NOT ADD UP.
BOLLYN RESPONDS: Here is the sentence in the context of the article:
Stanley Brezenoff, who later became executive director of the PA in 1990, was Deputy Mayor for Operations and First Deputy Mayor under Mayor Edward Irving Koch (1978-89) at the time the Port Authority's security contract was being negotiated with a senior Mossad agent. Brezenoff was "the second most powerful official in the Koch adminstration and was the government's chief operating officer, often serving as acting Mayor in Mr. Koch's absence," according to the New York Times.
Brezenoff directed the day-to-day operations of city agencies, including police, fire, and transportation. It is hard to imagine that Brezenoff, whose Yiddish-speaking grandparents had immigrated to the United States in the early 1900s from Russia and Austria, was unaware of the deal to give the PA security contract to Atwell Security of Tel Aviv. Malkin was, after all, a legendary figure among the Zionist Jews of New York.
The point is that in 1987, when the old Mossadniks got the security contract for the Port Authority, Brezenoff was deputy mayor of New York. In this position, he must have been aware of the contract with Atwell security and the fact that it was a Mossad-linked company.
Point 27.
The Washington Post revealed the serious nature of the crimes Malkin, Shalom, and Eitan were involved in when it reported in 1986 that Rafi Eitan, posing as a chemist, had travelled, in 1968, to the Pennsylvania nuclear processing plant that secretly diverted several hundred kilograms of weapons-grade uranium to Israel. A declassified FBI document shows that another Israeli, "Abraham Bendor, department of electronics," accompanied Eitan on that trip.
EITAN CORRECT, Israel's Secret War p. 419.
Malkin and the same Avraham Bendor were later named as the senior Israeli intelligence agents who obtained the security contract for the World Trade Center in 1987, only to lose the contract when Bendor's criminal past was discovered.
YES, INDEED.
Rafi Eitan, Zvi Malkin, and Avraham Ben-Dor were working together on super-secret Israeli missions from 1960 through 1987,
WHAT ARE THESE?
when they obtained the security contract with the Port Authority, the owner of the World Trade Center.
BOLLYN RESPONDS: Well, super-secret missions like kidnapping Adolf Eichmann from Argentina and obtaining weapons-grade uranium illegally from the U.S. for Israel's illegal nuclear weapons arsenal. Is this not made clear in the context?
Point 29.
1993 Maurice Greenberg (through China, close to Eisenberg, owner of Atwell security), becomes partner of Kroll, so linked with Shalom.
CERTAINLY CEO OF AIG, OF WHICH KROLL WAS CHAIRMAN, AND WHICH BOUGHT A LARGE SHARE OF KROLL.
Jules Kroll knew Kenneth Bialkin and Larry Silverstein through Citizens' Budget Commission.
SEEMS LIKELY: SEE BUSINESS WEEK http://investing.businessweek.com/businessweek/research/stocks/people/relationship.asp?personId=8159649&capId=39033945&previousCapId=91031&previousTitle=News%20Corp
though it is worth stressing that the acquaintance need not have been very intimate - the same sight lists approximately 140 people serving on the Citizens' Budget Commission.
Point 30.
Maurice Greenberg and Jules Kroll connected to key players of 911. Became partners in 1993, same year Kroll chosen for PA.
CANNOT ASCERTAIN IF THEY BECAME PARTNERS IN THIS YEAR, THOUGH THE DATE IS CORRECT FOR AWARDING OF PA CONTRACT. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9401EEDC1738F932A3575AC0A962958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=3
Greenberg's son Jeffrey W. became CEO of MMC in 1999 (MMC being parent company of Marsh Kroll).
YES - http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_/ai_57621872
Lewis Bremer, US proconsul, joined Marsh Kroll's crisis group after 911.
YES - http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_/ai_79049235
Point 31.
Kroll revamped security at WTC and airports.
YES: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9401EEDC1738F932A3575AC0A962958260
Also hired by Kuwait in October 1990 to find hidden wealth of Saddam.
CORRECT, SECOND PART. http://www.kroll.com/about/history/notable/
2003 - Kroll receives contracts to provide protection in Iraq.
CERTAINLY CORRECT THAT SECURITY FIRM HAS BEEN WORKING IN IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN, http://www.kroll.com/news/releases/index.aspx?id=16667
BUT HAVEN'T YET ESTABLISHED IF THE DATE IS CORRECT.
Kroll's son, Jeremy M.Kroll, MD at Marsh Kroll, and has been GM at Kroll's information security group. Responsible for business and strategic development, business intelligence, investigations, forensic accounting, and security services, http://www.nycp.org/pressReleases/2005/pr_101705_Rockefeller%2005-06.htmleg
ALSO ON BOARD AT CHALLENGE FUND:
1) Israel's national security adviser. APPARENTLY DAVID IVRY AGAIN.
2) former head of Shin Bet. JACOB PERRY
3) former Directors General of Ministries of Foreign affairs and defence. DAVID IVRY
4) Former commanders of Israel air force. DAVID IVRY
5) Son of Yitzhak Shamir. (in the past YES, 1995-97 http://duns100.dundb.co.il/2007/managers/56.asp
FUND uses its money to fund Israeli companies like Viryanet.
CORRECT: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_/ai_69401094
Point 32.
Funds managed by the 'Challenge Partners' - all Israelis, of course,
CORRECT: http://www.challenge.co.il/pages/team.asp
…headed JOSEPH CIECHANOVER (IMPORTANT: among other things, Director General of Israel's ministry for foreign affairs, head of Israel's defence mission to the US, and General Counsel to Israel ministries of Defence and Agriculture.)
CORRECT
Point 33.
Another partner - Major General Ilan Biran, Chairman of the Board of Rafael Armament Development Authority, former DG of Israeli Ministry of Defence. SECOND PART TRUE, CHECK FIRST PART, yes, first part true as well. http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=3306325
On 'advisory board' with Jeremy Kroll.
David Ivry - Commander of Israel Air Force (1977-1982), DG of Ministry of Defence (1986-96), Israel's chief rep. to the US-Israel strategic dialogue, Ambassador to the US 2000-2002.
CORRECT: http://www.challenge.co.il
Point 34.
Ivry also directed the IAF's criminal destruction of the Osirak nuclear reactor in Iraq. Ivry clearly has a history of directing criminal actions using aircraft. IT WOULD APPEAR HE DID DIRECT THIS: http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/biography/Ivry.html
Also, Israel's Secret Wars p.335 (Ian Black and Benny Morris, Hamish Hamilton1991) WHETHER HE HAS A 'HISTORY' OF SUCH THINGS IS DEBATABLE.
BOLLYN RESPONDS: Ivry was commander of the IAF when they bombed Iraq's reactor, which was a crime. Ivry was also commander of the squadron that attacked the USS Liberty. Being involved in two major war crimes using airplanes in 15 years seems to warrant having a 'history' of such things.
Here is the context:
From October 1977 to the end of 1982 [i.e. during the period of the most egregious criminal aerial assaults on Lebanon], Ivry commanded the Israel Air Force (IAF). Ivry also directed the IAF's criminal destruction of the Osirak nuclear reactor in Iraq. Ivry clearly has a history of directing criminal actions using aircraft.
In 1962, David Ivry became the commander of the first Israeli squadron of the French Dassault Mirage fighter jet. During the six-day war of 1967, Ivry served as a Mirage pilot and the commander of the Myst?re squadron. Ivry was either personally involved in the criminal Israeli attack on the U.S.S. Liberty with Mirage fighters or commanded those who were. Thirty-four American servicemen lost their lives in the Israeli attack. In any case, Ivry has clearly been involved in numerous war crimes and has shown very little regard for American lives.
'either personally involved in the criminal Israeli attack on the USS liberty with Mirage fighters or commanded those who were.'
YES, BUT THIS WAS ADMITTED TO BE AN ERROR, AND THOUGH THERE IS MURK SURROUNDING THE INCIDENT, THE EVIDENCE - AND COMMON SENSE - POINTS TOWARDS THIS BEING EFFECTIVELY A 'FRIENDLY FIRE' BLUNDER ATTACK ON AN ALLY. THIS IS IMPORTANT, AS THE ARTICLE REVOLVES AROUND AN ISRAELI WILLINGNESS TO COMMIT ATROCITIES AGAINST A PUTATIVE ALLY.
BOLLYN RESPONDS: The Israeli claim that it had mistakenly bombed the USS Liberty has been thoroughly exposed as a lie. This has been proven from A to Z. The Israelis jammed U.S. radio frequencies and even reported to base that the ship was American – but still went ahead and attacked it – as ordered -- to sink it. Of course Israel said it was a mistake. What do you expect? Do you think the Israelis would ever admit that they had bombed the USS Liberty on purpose?
Question: Jacob Perry - head of Shin Bet
CORRECT http://www.challenge.co.il
Challenge Fund has also been managed by Yair Shamir,
YES, 1995-97
http://duns100.dundb.co.il/2007/managers/56.asp
- son of Yitzhak - Zionist terrorist involved in numerous assassinations.
THIS 2ND STATEMENT SEEMS TO BE THE CASE - SHAMIR MEMBER OF STERN GANG AND LEHI. Also, Israel's Secret Wars, p. 96, BUT THIS OF COURSE IS THE FATHER, AND NOT THE SON.
Yair - 'attained rank of Colonel in AF, and served as head of electronics department, highest position etc...'
CORRECT. SEE: http://www.shalem.org.il/about/?did=54&aid=8f252f38cccb74674cdfef50a7a604ca
Point 35.
These are the kind of high-level Israeli intelligence agents that work with Jeremy Kroll on the "advisory board" of the Challenge Fund. Kroll brings a degree in fine arts (French and Italian) from Georgetown and his executive position with Kroll to the table. Who do you think makes the decisions in this group?
AGAIN, OPEN TO QUESTION. ALTHOUGH THE LEADERSHIP HAS, AMONG OTHERS, ILAN BIRAN, THE BOARD CURRENTLY HAS 10 MEMBERS, ONLY TWO OF WHICH, IVRY AND PERRY, SEEM TO HAVE A BACKGROUND IN THE IDF.
Is Henry Kissinger Setting Obama's Foreign Policy?
Americans who voted for the change promised by Barack Obama would probably have been disturbed to see Henry Kissinger, an 85-year-old "warhorse" from the Nixon administration and the Vietnam War era meeting with the leaders of Russia during an "informal" summit on March 19-20. Kissinger's recent meeting with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev was actually his third meeting, at least, since Medvedev was elected and his second since Obama was elected. So who's running U.S. foreign policy?
One might ask, "This is change?" Isn't Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in charge of U.S. foreign policy? What position does Henry Kissinger have in the Obama administration and why is he meeting with the Russian leadership before Clinton and Obama? Who does Henry Kissinger serve and why is he crafting U.S. foreign policy?
The best answer to these questions came directly from Obama's National Security Adviser, Jim Jones, when he spoke in Munich's Hotel Bayerischer Hof on February 8, 2009:
Thank you for that wonderful tribute to Henry Kissinger yesterday. Congratulations. As the most recent National Security Advisor of the United States, I take my daily orders from Dr. Kissinger, filtered down through General Brent Scowcroft and Sandy Berger, who is also here. We have a chain of command in the National Security Council that exists today.
Jim Jones, Obama's National Security Adviser, admitted that he takes his daily orders from Dr. Henry Kissinger. He was not joking. His speech can be read on the White House website.
This is how the Chicago Tribune and its sister paper the Los Angeles Times explained Kissinger's recent visit to Moscow:
To "reset" relations with Russia, an old diplomatic warhorse is back on the path. Henry Kissinger, the architect of Cold War detente with the Soviet Union, met informally with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin to try to smooth over a new generation of animosities between the countries.
And:
The octogenarian Republican is an improbable emissary to push the diplomatic line of a young Democratic president. But here he was in Moscow on Friday [March 20]: Henry Kissinger, the architect of Cold War detente with the Soviet Union, meeting informally with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev to try to smooth over a new generation of animosities between the two countries.
Interfax, the Russian news service, reported that the purpose of Kissinger's visit was to help organize a meeting between Obama and Medvedev and arrange Obama's visit to Moscow. The White House denied that Kissinger had been sent by President Barack Obama. "They're private citizens and not there at the behest of the White House," said an administration official, discussing the contacts on condition of anonymity. "But they did inform the White House beforehand."
Wait a minute. If the White House did not send Kissinger, but Kissinger is organizing a meeting between Presidents Obama and Medvedev, who is really running the White House and why is Kissinger discussing U.S. foreign policy with the leaders of Russia? This visit by Kissinger to Moscow is the clearest signal to that the Obama White House is controlled by Kissinger and his fellow Elders of Zion. Why else has the news of this visit been suppressed in the mainstream media.
Obama, it should be remembered, refused to comment on Israel's criminal assault on Gaza in January because he did not think it was proper, as president-elect, to voice his opinion while George W. Bush was still president. Obama said that he would "have plenty to say" about Gaza after January 20, yet he has not said anything meaningful about the situation and kept his envoy from even visiting the devastated Gaza Strip. Well, Mr. Obama, how proper is it for Henry Kissinger to speak for the United States government to the Russian leaders?
Kissinger, it should be noted, is very close to Maurice "Hank" Greenberg the former head of A.I.G., the corrupt insurance company which has funneled a large part of the incredible amount of $180 billion received from the U.S. government to private banks such as Goldman Sachs. Kissinger became chairman of A.I.G.'s International Advisory Board in 1987. Greenberg's name, like Kissinger's, is kept out of the media discussion of A.I.G., which is like talking about the development of Ford Motor Company without mentioning Henry Ford. Why is Kissinger's role in crafting U.S. policy and in the criminally corrupt A.I.G. not discussed in the U.S. media as he discusses U.S. foreign policy with Russia's leaders?
