The United States & World Media barely touches Epstein links with Israeli intelligence


Absent from US news coverage of US President Donald Trump’s waffling over the release of the Jeffrey Epstein files is any mention of the child sex predator’s apparent ties to Israeli intelligence.

A 13 July Nexis search of US news outlets found that, of the 383 stories unleashed by Trump’s broken promise to reveal everything Epstein, only a single article broached ties between Epstein and Israel’s intelligence agency, the Mossad – and then tried to undercut it.

The Epstein-Israeli intelligence connection was covered extensively in a 2019-2021 series of in-depth articles by MintPress News.

MintPress investigative reporter Whitney Webb summarized an interview by former CBS News executive producer and Narativ investigative journalist Zev Shalev with former senior executive for Israel’s Directorate of Military Intelligence Ari Ben-Menashe. There, Webb summed up, Ben-Menashe claimed “not only to have met Jeffrey Epstein and his alleged madam, Ghislaine Maxwell, back in the 1980s, but that both Epstein and Maxwell were already working with Israeli intelligence during that time period.”

Ben-Menashe also told Shalev he saw Jeffrey Epstein in the office of Mossad asset Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine Maxwell’s father, several times in the 1980s.

MintPress further reported that one of Epstein’s chief financial backers, Victoria’s Secret owner Les Wexner, was part of The Mega Group – a secretive group of billionaires formed in 1991 by Wexner and Seagram’s heir Charles Bronfman focused on “philanthropy and Jewishness,” its mission described by one member as faith in and devotion to the state of Israel.

Wexner became Epstein’s biggest financial client in 1989, handing over the financial management of his $1.4 billion business and his charitable foundation to a young man virtually unknown on Wall Street. By also granting him power of attorney, Epstein was authorized to cash Wexner’s checks and give away his money.

Among more mainstream journalists, Miami Herald investigative reporter Julie K. Brown, whose vigilance reopened the Epstein case after it was buried by federal prosecutors in 2008, also suspects that Epstein had connections with Israeli intelligence.

“It’s not beyond the realm of possibility that Epstein had connections to the [Israeli intelligence community],” Brown said in a July 2021 interview with The Times of Israel to promote her book, Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story. “Robert Maxwell certainly had those kinds of connections, and Epstein had a close relationship with Robert Maxwell.”

Maxwell is the British media mogul who had secretly worked for Mossad before drowning under mysterious circumstances in 1991. A 2022 BBC documentary series, House of Maxwell, revealed how Epstein helped Maxwell hide millions of his assets in offshore accounts after the newspaper tycoon was accused of plundering his employees’ pension funds.

Ultimately, more than a billion dollars was found missing from the Maxwell firms.

Epstein and associate Ghislaine Maxwell, the youngest of Robert Maxwell’s nine children and reportedly his favorite, recruited and trafficked underage girls who were sexually abused by Epstein and, it is contended, at least by some of the many powerful individuals he made a point of meeting and catering to.

In 2019, while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, Epstein, 66, was found hanged in his cell in the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan. His death was ruled a suicide, a finding that is now backed by the Trump administration to the outrage of Trump’s MAGA base.

But those close to the case, including Brown and Epstein’s brother Mark, believe he was murdered. Mark Epstein has pointed to a mark embedded in Epstein’s neck as evidence of strangulation.

He also hired a private pathologist, Michael Baden, to conduct his own autopsy of his brother. Baden found broken bones in Epstein’s neck that occur “much more commonly in homicidal strangulation.”

Suspicious, too, is that the two prison guards keeping suicide watch over Epstein happened to fall asleep during their scheduled checks that night while, at the same time, the two cameras outside Epstein’s cell were not functioning, according to a 2023 report from the Justice Department’s Office of the Inspector General.

The report cited “a combination of negligence, misconduct and outright job performance failures … contributed to an environment in which arguably one of the most notorious inmates … was left unmonitored and alone in his cell.”

To back up the official argument for Epstein’s suicide, US Attorney General Pam Bondi earlier in July released footage from cameras covering the common areas, stairwells and elevator bay leading to Epstein’s cell tier. Federal investigators say the footage is proof no one entered or left Epstein’s tier overnight.

An analysis by WIRED and independent experts, however, found the “raw” footage had been modified with a professional editing tool prior to its release. The experts also discovered nearly three minutes of missing footage from the recordings before midnight on the night of Epstein’s death.

A Who’s Who

Even if there is no missing footage, Mark Epstein points out that the cell doors could have been left unlocked inside the tier so that another inmate could have left his cell, killed Epstein and returned undetected.

“There are two possibilities: one, somebody killed him before they locked up the tier. Or two, someone already on the tier went into his cell,” Epstein’s brother told WPBF News, a TV station in West Palm Beach, Florida. “Nobody coming in from outside doesn’t mean he wasn’t murdered.”

In her interview with The Times of Israel, Brown questioned Epstein’s suicide by asking the question many in the US media have ignored: “Why would Epstein give up before he even got to court?”

Indeed, Epstein had no trouble skirting a tough sentence the first time he was charged with child sex trafficking in 2005. In a plea agreement that avoided federal prosecution, Epstein served just 13 months in a work-release program on a single state charge of solicitation for prostitution.

The architect of that deal was then US Attorney Alexander Acosta, who was later named Labor Secretary in Trump’s first term.

Acosta reportedly told White House interviewers prior to his selection that he cut the deal with an Epstein attorney because “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone.” The source of the quote was a former White House staffer cited in a 2019 Daily Beast article by Vanity Fair journalist Vicky Ward.

As Epstein’s accomplice, socialite and heiress Ghislaine Maxwell is understood to have lured most of the girls for Epstein’s abuse with promises of easy money, modeling careers and educational assistance. She was nabbed after a year of eluding federal authorities and convicted in 2022 of recruiting, grooming and sex trafficking underage girls for Epstein between 1994 and 2004.

Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence in a low-security federal prison in Florida and won’t be eligible for release until July 2037. According to Trump biographer Michael Wolff, Trump considered a pardon for Maxwell near the end of his first term.

Hundreds of Epstein-related court documents released in 2024 don’t accuse anyone of sexual misconduct but list the names, dates and places of many of those who met with Epstein.

The list reads like a “Who’s Who” of America’s top politicians, businessmen, scientists, academics and assorted celebrities. It includes Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Michael Jackson, Bill Gates, David Copperfield, retail magnate Les Wexner, hedge fund billionaire Leon Black, celebrity lawyer Alan Dershowitz, Nobel prize-winning physicist Stephen Hawking, New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson and Bard College President Leon Botstein, along with Britain’s Prince Andrew and many others.

Intelligence ties

As is often noted, Trump and Epstein were a jet-setting playboy duo for more than a decade until they had a “falling out” in 2004, just a year before the FBI began to investigate Epstein for child sex trafficking. As late as 2002, Trump told New York Magazine, “I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”

Epstein later claimed in an interview with Wolff that Trump first had sex with now-wife Melania on Epstein’s private jet, dubbed the “Lolita Express,” one of seven documented flights Trump took on the infamous private jet.

Epstein’s lavish lifestyle and his ties to suspected Mossad asset Robert Maxwell and at least one high Israeli official – former Israeli general, defense and prime minister Ehud Barak – have raised questions as to whether he was working for Israeli intelligence, including the military arm, Aman.

Epstein met with Barak on nearly a monthly basis – 36 times between 2013 and 2017. After one particular visit to Epstein’s luxury Manhattan apartment in 2017, Barak was spotted leaving the complex with his face covered to dodge surveillance cameras.

According to his former employees, his victims and a lawyer for the victims, Epstein had 24-hour security cameras in every room of his residences.

Epstein also knew former CIA director William Burns, when Burns was US Deputy Secretary of State under former US President Barack Obama. Epstein met with Burns three times in 2014. Burns was named CIA director in 2021.

The sex trafficker’s political influence goes back at least to the Clinton administration, says MintPress investigative reporter Whitney Webb in her recent book, One Nation Under Blackmail.

“White House visitor logs show that Epstein visited the Clinton White House 17 times, accompanied on most of these visits by a different, attractive young woman. Reporting on those visitor logs was largely done by a single media outlet, Britain’s The Daily Mail, with hardly any American mainstream media outlets bothering to investigate these revelations about Epstein and a former US president.”

Israel’s leverage

Flight logs show Bill Clinton traveled at least 17 times on the “Lolita Express.” There are also numerous reports that he visited Epstein’s private island in the Virgin Islands, Little Saint James. That’s where lawyers for Epstein’s victims say many of the worst crimes against underage girls were committed.

In a 2011 deposition for her attorneys, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who at age 16 became one of Epstein’s sex trafficking victims, testified that he told her he had “compromising” information on Bill Clinton and that the former president “owes me a favor.”

An earlier story for MintPress News illustrated Israel’s leverage over Clinton by citing his last-minute presidential pardon of Marc Rich, the commodities trader and hedge fund manager charged in 1983 for violating the US embargo on Iranian oil while dealing on Israel’s behalf.

According to the Israeli daily Haaretz, Rich was friendly with prominent Israel politicians, including Barak, and often volunteered his services for Israeli intelligence.

In his presidential campaigns, Trump has repeatedly brought up Clinton’s association with Epstein, but only to suggest that Bill and Hillary were involved in Epstein’s death.

Miami Herald reporter Julie K. Brown deserves the credit for not letting the Epstein story die. After his plea deal in Florida on much-reduced charges in 2008 that otherwise could have put him in jail for up to 45 years, Epstein’s case would have been forgotten after his having served little more than a year in a cozy work-release program if Brown hadn’t pursued the story further.

In a three-part series of investigative articles in 2018, she exposed the manipulation and corruption of law enforcement officials resulting in Epstein’s secret plea on state rather than federal charges for a much softer prison sentence.

In her Times of Israel interview, Brown said there was a striking similarity between Epstein’s death in August 2019 and Robert Maxwell’s death in November 1991.

The 68-year-old media magnate was alleged to have drowned after falling from his yacht, the Lady Ghislaine, near the Canary Islands. Spanish police insisted no foul play was suspected in Maxwell’s death, but rumors persist to this day.

Maxwell to Bondi

Suicide is one possible theory. Another is that Maxwell was assassinated.

Maxwell was mired in debt at the time and may have been trying to blackmail the agency to bail himself out, according to political and investigative journalist Gordon Thomas, author of Robert Maxwell, Israel’s Superspy: The Life and Murder of a Media Mogul.

After Maxwell’s death, Epstein ingratiated himself with members of the Maxwell family who had been left bankrupt and riddled with debt, Brown said in her Times of Israel interview. Epstein may have offered financial assistance to Robert Maxwell’s widow Elisabeth.

Ghislaine was likely aware of the many secrets her father took to the grave related to his life in politics, finance and espionage, Brown said.

Following his death, Maxwell was honored with a burial on Jerusalem’s Mount of Olives – formally occupied territory – where members of the Israeli intelligence community as well as then-Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir attended his funeral.

“Shamir eulogized the British tycoon for the political connections he brought to Israel during the 1980s and for the money he invested in it,” reported The Times of Israel.

Brown believes the Epstein case is far from closed.

“[Epstein] did not do this alone,” she told The Times of Israel. “There were plenty of people that either knew about what Epstein was doing, or even participated in what he was doing. This was an international sex trafficking organization that was similar to an organized crime family – so it shouldn’t just end just with the prosecution of [Ghislaine Maxwell].”

But before Trump ordered her to release the transcript of Epstein’s grand jury testimony on 18 July – after his support base had started a petition demanding her resignation – US Attorney General Pam Bondi said there was nothing further to investigate in the Epstein case.

She was at least consistent. This was something she failed to do while she was attorney general in Florida two decades ago.

As Brown noted on her X account in February: “It’s interesting to note that Pam Bondi was Florida’s attorney general 2011-2019 – a period of time when Jeffrey Epstein’s plane records became public, victims’ lawsuits were filed and a lot of new evidence against Epstein surfaced. So, questions should be asked about why she didn’t take up the case – or launch a probe – when she was attorney general in Florida.”

Share:

Did Israel lobby “bullying and threats” push Univ. of Southampton to cancel conference?

Organizers of an academic conference on Israel are proceeding with an urgent legal challenge after the UK’s University of Southampton today confirmed that it has canceled the event.

Ali Abunimah


As The Electronic Intifada reported on Tuesday, university officials told organizers that they intended to withdraw permission for the conference.
But the university did not publicly confirm the cancelation until today, when it issued astatement citing “the foreseeable risks to safety and public order at and near the conference venue” as a justification for shutting it down.
The conference, “International Law and the State of Israel: Legitimacy, Responsibility and Exceptionalism,” had been scheduled for 17-19 April.

Police: the university’s decision

“This was not an easy decision,” the university states, adding that it “was made on the basis of information from the police who say it is probable there will be a high number of demonstrators at the event, the consequences of which could lead to incidents of public disorder.”
But speaking to The Electronic Intifada today, a spokesperson for Hampshire police seemed to distance the force from the cancelation: “it’s very much a university decision … the decision to cancel the event is definitely the university’s decision.”
statement posted on the Hampshire Constabulary website today in response to enquiries from The Electronic Intifada confirmed that the force had been asked by the university to “provide a view on security” for the conference.
Organizers have previously rejected such claims as a pretext for succumbing to intense political pressure from Israel lobby groups and their supporters in government.

“Bullying and threats”

A number of the university’s own faculty have publicly condemned the decision.
“It seems to me outrageous that you seem to have allowed the bullying and threats of the Israeli lobby to prevent the perfectly lawful and legitimate exercise of free speech and academic debate,” Professor David Gurham, director of research for the University of Southampton School of Law, wrote in a letter to the university’s vice chancellor Don Nutbeam.
“I understand that the police had reported that they would be perfectly able and willing to deal with any security concerns at the event: this ought to be good enough,” Gurham added.
report in The Jewish Chronicle on Tuesday lent weight to organizers’ suspicions that concern for safety was an excuse.
Board of Deputies of British Jews president Vivian Wineman told the Chronicle that “When we had a meeting with the university vice-chancellor they said they would review it [the conference] on health and safety terms.”
“The two lines of attack possible were legal and health and safety and they were leaning on that one,” Wineman added.
The Board of Deputies is one of a number of Israel lobby groups that have lobbied for the conference to be canceled.

Legal challenge

Lawyers acting for the organizers are expected to file an application this week forjudicial review of the university’s decision.
In a statement posted today, conference organizers revealed that an internal appeal of the decision had been rejected by the vice chancellor, prompting them to take the battle to the courts.
“This decision by the university is wrong in law, wrong in morality and wrong for the University of Southampton in particular and for all academic spaces all over the country and the world generally,” the organizers say.
“We hope that immediate legal action will help save the reputation of the University which has sadly been thrown into serious doubt by this decision.”

Israel embassy welcomes cancelation

Sussex Friends of Israel and the Israeli embassy welcomed the university’s decision to suppress the conference.
The Board of Deputies of British Jews also welcomed the cancelation. “This conference was never about academic freedom. It represented the opposite of free speech,” the group told The Jewish Chronicle.
“It was to be an international gathering of anti-Zionists who were using the cover of a distinguished university to promote their view that there should never have been a Jewish state,” the Board of Deputies said. “Such events have no place at a reputable British university.”

Growing outcry

Meanwhile, there is a growing international outcry over what looks to many like yet another example of freedom of speech and academic freedom being suspended when it comes to the question of Palestine.
There are now almost seven thousand signatures on an online petition urging the university to “uphold free speech” and allow the conference to proceed.
More than 900 academics from all over the world have signed on to a statement in support of the conference.
A growing number of scholars have also written individual and group letters to Southampton protesting its decision.
The letters from academics – including those from Southampton itself, the University of London colleges Goldsmiths and SOAS, Irish professors with the group Academics for Palestine and others – have been posted online.
Share:

Iran nuclear deal and actions

Note: We are still looking for volunteers and supporters of our
rapidly growing Palestine Museum of Natural History
(http://palestinenature.org). I am also traveling to France and Norway
next week and would love to connect with those in those countries.

We have several good news in the span of few days: the win of
Netanyahu (which will accelerate the end of the apartheid regime), the
Iran nuclear deal, the restructuring and maturing Palestinian
leadership inside 1948 areas (including a march from Naqab to
Jerusalem to recognize the "Unrecognized villages"), the foolishness
of Saudi Arabia and Egypt getting into a quagmire in Yemen (even
though Yemeni people suffer but they will win), the relief on not
having the wall plan approved in Beit Jala/Cremisan area (see below),
and Palestine joining the International Criminal Court (even though I
think PA political leaders do not have the spine to actually bring
cases before the court since they put themselves at the mercy of their
occupiers). Oppression though continues here with Israel destroying
home shooting unarmed civilians, and kidnapping our people (including
the honorable Khaleda Jarrar). Of all the new developments, I think
the Iran nuclear deal will prove to be game changing. Lifting the
sanctions on Iran and beginning to normalize relations has many
ramifications. I want to just address one of the most significant: it
proves to the subservient Arab leaders that standing up to Israel and
its lackeys in Washington is possible. Iranian economy was and
continues to be better than geographically and populationally similar
Egypt (subservient regime to Israel) even when the former was
subjected to various sanctions and restrictions for 36 years.
Scientifically Iran was able to publish nearly as much research as
highest four Arab countries combined in the last 20 years. And now as
sanctions are slowly lifted Iran will leap a generation ahead
economically, socially, and scientifically. The reason is rather
simple: Iran (while being restricted by an "Islamic Republic"
ideology) still has competitions for president and parliament and a
relatively open society with respect for minorities and that includes
people who speak Arabic or Hindi or Durzi or other languages not Farsi
(Arabs, etc), and people who are not Sh'ii Muslims (Sunni, Jews,
Christians, Yazidis, etc). I am hopeful the US does not get its arms
twisted to further follies by Israel/Zionists and actually caries
through on its commitment to slowly lift sanctions. If they do, I am
certain Iran will progress in more liberal fashion than any nearby
country (Pakistan or Saudi Arabia or Syria or even Turkey). My eyes
now are on Turkey and other countries with leaders who actually can
read the geopolitical landscape to adjust their positions accordingly.
Perhaps Turkey, and Iran, joined by Syria, Iraq, and Lebanon can help
get rid of the Western created and backed fundamentalists and
democratize their own governments free from Israel/US interference.
There are monumental changes that are happening and the struggle is
not easy and maybe be bloody. The US and Europe can still get out of
this with minimal losses and really promote democracy and secularism
in the Western Asia and North Africa by abandoning their promotion of
sectarianism and violence. The biggest single step they can achieve
this is by applying sanction on Israel until it complies with
international law including the right of our Palestinian refugees to
return to their homes and lands. Israel must also end its 50+ racist
laws against non-Jews and hundreds of other laws/military orders that
discriminate against the 4.6 million Palestinians in the occupied
territories (occupied WB including Jerusalem and Gaza). In historic
Canaan/Land of Palestine we can then move to become a secular
democracy and a model for the other areas in the region. The injustice
to 12 million Palestinians remain the source of much (not all) of the
troubles dominating the news today and addressing it will show the
world that western power will indeed abandon their hypocrisy and
promote democracy and peace.

ACTION BDS: In support of CAPJPO-EuroPalestine campaign to urge FIFA
to suspend Israel from FIFA, please send a letter to FIFA president to
immediately expel the apartheid state of Israel from FIFA. Mandela,
Archbishop Desmond Tutu, and the ex-government minister Ronnie
Kasrils, all of whom experienced the brutality of this regime, state
that Israeli apartheid is far worse than South African apartheid ever
was. Israel is guilty of far more serious crimes against humanity. For
further information: (French)
http://www.europalestine.com/spip.php?article10449
http://www.thenation.com/blog/178642/after-latest-incident-israels-future-fifa-uncertain#

Did Israel lobby “bullying and threats” push Univ. of Southampton to
cancel conference?
http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/did-israel-lobby-bullying-and-threats-push-univ-southampton-cancel-conference
organizer's response
http://freespeechsouthampton.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/organisersstatement-following-vice.html
sign petition in support here:
https://www.change.org/p/the-university-of-southampton-uphold-free-speech-allow-the-conference-on-israel-and-international-law-to-proceed
(case going to court)

Cremisan Monastery wins appeal in Israeli High Court: Route of Israeli
Wall must be changed
http://www.imemc.org/article/71112

Support Refugees in Egypt. Demand ending of repression
http://www.refugeesolidarity.org/news/jointstatementegypt

The Power of Israel over the United States
There are at least 52 major American Jewish organizations actively
engaged in promoting Israel’s foreign policy, economic and
technological agenda in the US
http://mycatbirdseat.com/2015/03/90536the-power-of-israel-over-the-united-states/

and do come visit us in Bethlehem, Occupied Palestine

Mazin Qumsiyeh
Professor and Director
PMNH
__._,_.___
Share:

Why is the U.S. okay with Israel having nuclear weapons but not Iran?

Iranian officials sometimes respond to accusations that Tehran is seeking a nuclear weapons capability by replying that, not only do they not want a bomb, they'd actually like to see a nuclear-weapons-free Middle East. Yes, this is surely in part a deflection, meant to shift attention away from concerns about Iran's nuclear activities by not-so-subtly nodding to the one country in the region that does have nuclear weapons: Israel.
By Max Fisher
But could Iran have a point? Is there something hypocritical about the world tolerating Israel's nuclear arsenal, which the country does not officially acknowledge but has been publicly known for decades, and yet punishing Iran with severe economic sanctions just for its suspected steps toward a weapons program? Even Saudi Arabia, which sees Iran as its implacable enemy and made its accommodations with Israel long ago, often joins Tehran's calls for a "nuclear-free region." And anyone not closely versed in Middle East issues might naturally wonder why the United States would accept Israeli warheads but not an Iranian program.
"This issue comes up in every lecture I give," Joe Cirincione, president of the nuclear nonproliferation-focused Ploughshares Fund, told me. The suspicions that Israel gets special treatment because it's Israel, and that Western countries are unfairly hard on Israel's neighbors, tend to inform how many in the Middle East see the ongoing nuclear disputes. "It is impossible to give a nuclear policy talk in the Middle East without having the questions focus almost entirely on Israel," Cirincione said.
Of course, many Westerners would likely argue that Israel's weapons are morally and historically defensible in a way that an Iranian program would not be, both because of Israel's roots in the Holocaust and because it fought a series of defensive wars against its neighbors. "Israel has never given any reason to doubt its solely defensive nature," said Robert Satloff, executive director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, summarizing the American position. "Israel has never brandished its capabilities to exert regional influence, cow its adversaries or threaten its neighbors."
There's truth to both of these perspectives. But the story of the Israeli nuclear program, and how the United States came to accept it, is more complicated and surprising than you might think.
The single greatest factor explaining how Israel got the world to accept its nuclear program may be timing. The first nuclear weapon was detonated in 1945, by the United States. In 1970, most of the world agreed to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which forbids any new countries from developing nuclear weapons. In that 25-year window, every major world power developed a nuclear weapon: the Soviet Union, United Kingdom, France and China. They were joined by exactly one other country: Israel.
The Israeli nuclear program was driven in many ways by the obsessive fear that gripped the nation's founding prime minister, David Ben-Gurion. After the 1948 Arab-Israeli war, in which the new country fought off Egyptian and Jordanian armies, Ben-Gurion concluded that Israel could survive only if it had a massive military deterrent -- nuclear weapons.
"What Einstein, Oppenheimer and Teller, the three of them are Jews, made for the United States could also be done by scientists in Israel for their own people," Ben-Gurion wrote in 1956. Avner Cohen, the preeminent historian of Israel's nuclear program, has written that Ben-Gurion "believed Israel needed nuclear weapons as insurance if it could no longer compete with the Arabs in an arms race, and as a weapon of last resort in case of an extreme military emergency. Nuclear weapons might also persuade the Arabs to accept Israel's existence, leading to peace in the region."
But Israel of the 1950s was a poor country. And it was not, as it is today, a close political and military ally of the United States. Israel had to find a way to keep up with the much wealthier and more advanced world powers dominating the nuclear race. How it went about doing this goes a long way to explaining both why the United States initially opposed Israel's nuclear program and how the world came around to accepting Israeli warheads.
So the Israelis turned to France, which was much further along on its own nuclear program, and in 1957 secretly agreed to help install a plutonium-based facility in the small Israeli city of Dimona. Why France did this is not settled history. French foreign policy at the time was assiduously independent from, and standoffish toward, the United States and United Kingdom; perhaps this was one of France's many steps meant to reclaim great power status. A year earlier, Israel had assisted France and the United Kingdom in launching a disastrous invasion of Egypt that became known as the "Suez Crisis"; French leaders may have felt that they owed Israel. Whatever France's reason, both countries kept it a secret from the United States.
When U.S. intelligence did finally discover Israel's nuclear facility, in 1960, Israeli leaders insisted that it was for peaceful purposes and that they were not interested in acquiring a nuclear weapon. Quite simply, they were lying, and for years resisted and stalled U.S.-backed nuclear inspectors sent to the facility. (This may help shed some light on why the United States and Israel are both so skeptical of Iran's own reactor, potentially capable of yielding plutonium, under construction at Arak.) The work continued at Dimona.
Gradually, as the United States came to understand the scope of the program, the administrations of Eisenhower, Kennedy and even the relatively Israel-friendly Johnson all pushed ever harder to halt Israel's nuclear development. Their response to an Israeli bomb was "no."
"The U.S. tried to stop Israel from getting nuclear weapons and to stop France from giving Israel the technology and material it needed to make them," Cirincione said. "We failed."
The turning point for both Israel and the United States may have been the 1967 war. The second large-scale Arab-Israeli war lasted only six days, but that was enough to convince Israeli leaders that, though they had won, they could lose next time. Two crucial things happened in the next five years. First, in 1968, Israel secretly developed a nuclear weapon. Second, and perhaps more important, was a White House meeting in September 1969 between President Nixon and Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir. What happened during that meeting is secret. But the Nixon's administration'smeticulous records show that Secretary of State Henry Kissinger said to Nixon, in a later conversation about the Meir meeting, "during your private discussions with Golda Meir you emphasized that our primary concern was that Israel make no visible introduction of nuclear weapons or undertake a nuclear test program."
That meeting between Nixon and Meir set what has been Israel's unofficial policy ever since: one in which the country does nothing to publicly acknowledge or demonstrate its nuclear weapons program, and in exchange the United States would accept it. The Nixon administration had concluded that, while it didn't like the Israeli weapons program, it also wasn't prepared to stop it. The Cold War had polarized the Middle East, a region where Soviet influence was growing and where Israel -- along with Iran -- were scarce American allies. If they had already resigned themselves to living with a nuclear weapon, Kissinger concluded, they might as well make it on their terms.
"Essentially the bargain has been that Israel keeps its nuclear deterrent deep in the basement and Washington keeps its critique locked in the closet," Satloff explained.
If the 1967 war had sparked Israel's rush to a warhead and led the United States to tacitly accept the program, then the 1973 Arab-Israeli war made that arrangement more or less permanent. Egypt and Syria launched a joint surprise attack on Yom Kippur and made rapid gains -- so rapid that Israeli leaders feared that the entire country would be overrun. They ordered the military to prepare several nuclear warheads for launch -- exactly the sort of drastic, final measure then Ben-Gurion had envisioned 20 years earlier. (Update: This incident is disputed. See note at bottom.) But the Israeli forces held, assisted by an emergency U.S. resupply that Nixon ordered, and eventually won the war.
The desperation of the 1973 war may have ensured that, once Nixon left office, his deal with the Israelis would hold. And it has. But the world has changed in the past 40 years. Israel's conventional military forces are now far more powerful than all of its neighbors' militaries combined. Anyway, those neighbors have made peace with Israel save Syria, which has held out mostly for political reasons. From Israel's view, there is only one potentially existential military threat left: the Iranian nuclear program. But that program has not produced a warhead and, with Tehran now seeking to reach an agreement on the program, it may never.
Some scholars are beginning to ask whether the old deal is outdated, if Israel should consider announcing its nuclear weapons arsenal publicly. Cohen, the historian who studies the Israel program, argues that the policy of secrecy "undermines genuine Israeli interests, including the need to gain recognition and legitimacy and to be counted among the responsible states in this strategic field."

The dilemma for Israel is that, should Iran ever develop a nuclear warhead, Israel will surely feel less unsafe if it has its own nuclear deterrent. But, ironically, Israel's nuclear arsenal may itself be one of the factors driving Iran's program in the first place.
"History tells us that Israel's position as the sole nuclear-armed state in the region is an anomaly -- regions either have several nuclear states or none," said Cirincione, of the nonproliferation Ploughshares Fund. "At some point, for its own security, Israel will have to take the bombs out of the basement and put them on the negotiating table."
Some scholars suggest that world powers, including the United States, may have quietly tolerated Egyptian and Syrian chemical weapons stockpiles as counterbalances to Israel's own weapons of mass destruction; a concession just large enough to prevent them from seeking nuclear weapons of their own.
Ultimately, while every president from Nixon to Obama has accepted Israel's nuclear weapons, at some point the United States would surely prefer to see a Middle East that's entirely free of weapons of mass destruction.
"We are not okay with Israel having nuclear weapons, but U.S. policymakers recognize that there is not much we can do about it in the short-term," Cirincione said. "But these are general back-burner efforts. All recognize that Israel will only give up its nuclear weapons in the context of a regional peace settlement where all states recognized the rights of other states to exist and agree on territorial boundaries. This would mean a settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian issues."
In other words, the Middle East would have to cease being the Middle East. Maybe that will happen, but not anytime soon.
Update: The much-discussed 1973 incident, in which Israel allegedly readied its nuclear weapons in case the country was overrun by the invading Arab armies, may have never actually happened. Avner Cohen, the ultimate authority on the subject, wrote as much in an October post for Arms Control Wonk. "The nuclear lore about 1973 has turned into an urban legend: nobody knows how exactly it originated and who the real sources were, but it is commonly believed as true or near-true," he wrote, calling the event "mythology."
What actually happened, according to Cohen, is that Defense Minister Moshe Dayan proposed in the middle of the war that Israel prepare to detonate a nuclear warhead over the desert as a "test" and show of force. But his proposal, Cohen says, was rejected immediately. Thanks to freelance journalist and former colleague Armin Rosen for flagging this. Read more in this recent paper on Israel's 1973 "nuclear alert," co-authored by Cohen along with Elbridge Colby, William McCants, Bradley Morris and William Rosenau.
Share:

Israel applies to become founding member of China development bank

(Mehreen Khan)  The Israeli government has submitted its application to become a founding member of a controversial Chinese-led development bank, in a move that is likely to cause consternation in Washington.
Newly re-elected Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu signed a letter to join the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank(AIIB) by the March 31 deadline, according to the country’s foreign ministry.
Israel would become the latest country to join the 40-nation bank, which already includes the UK, Germany, France, Italy and Australia.
“Israel’s membership in the Bank will open opportunities for integration of Israeli companies in various infrastructure projects, which will be financed by the bank,”said an Israeli government statement.
The creation of the Bank, under the vision of Chinese premier Xi Jinping, has attracted criticism from the United States, who has warned their closest allies against courting better relations with Beijing.
Following Britain’s application for membership, one US official told the Financial Times: “We are wary about a trend of constant accommodation of China, which is not the best way to engage a rising power.”
The AIIB aims to rival similar organisations such as the World Bank, and Asian Development Bank, in funding $100 billion in infrastructure projects across the Asian continent. Half of that amount has already been budgeted by Beijing.
Diplomatic relations between the Israeli government and the Obama administration have reached a nadir as the US has sought to strike a nuclear deal with Iran.
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu accepted an invitation to visit Washington last month, behind the president’s back, addressing the US Congress and criticising the administration’s attempts to broker a deal with Tehran.
US Treasury Secretary has called on the AIIB to complement existing institutions and adopt standards of governance.
The Israeli foreign ministry hailed the AIIB as a “diplomatic achievement” and “one of the most important initiatives in terms of Chinese foreign policy and in particular for President Xi Jinping.”
Share:

Israeli who fabricated kidnap story 'was looking for attention,' army says

Israeli youth who fabricated a missing person's report, which 
prompted a massive manhunt by security forces near Hebron
 on Thursday, was "looking for attention," the army's top 
spokesperson told Channel 2 on Friday.

Brig.-Gen. Moti Almoz recounted the tense hours during
 which large contingents of soldiers and police concentrated
forces in the southern West Bank in a frantic search for
 Niv Asraf, the Beersheba native who falsified a distress call.

"The army did not let up until we understood beyond 
any doubt that we could call off the massive search,"
 Almoz said. "During those hours, we were focused
 on finding a kidnapped person alive."

Police said they view the incident with the utmost severity
 in particular due to what they said was a "major waste of 
resources for all of the security services."












Police said Asraf, 22 from Beersheba, was found 
alive and well in a dry creek bed outside Kiryat Arba, 
with a sleeping bag and a supply of canned goods. 
They added that the investigation against Asraf and
 his friend is ongoing.

A massive search for Asraf was launched late Thursday 
afternoon, after police received a call at 4:17 p.m. from
 Asaraf's friend, who said he and a friend got a flat tire 
near Hebron, on the road between Kiryat Arba and the 
Palestinian village Beit Anoun. Police said he told them
 his friend, Asraf, walked off to get tools to change the
 flat tire, but did not return.

The report was taken as a possible kidnapping from the
 first moments, and soon hundreds of soldiers and security
 personnel were combing the area and blocking traffic on
 nearby roads in the hunt for Asraf, also carrying out 
searches in Palestinian homes in Beit Anoun.  

After responding to the call, security forces also noticed
 that the car did not have a flat tire. Other aspects of the
 story didn't add up, and under questioning, Asraf's friend
 contradicted himself to investigators. 

Ben Hartman contributed to this report.
Share: