Showing posts with label Palestinians. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Palestinians. Show all posts

Muslims & Christian Leaders In Palestine are appealing to all world’s humane and considerate masses to rally in protest at Israeli terrorism

Sheikh Sabri, Archbishop Hanna launch distress signal over Gaza tragedy

OCCUPIED JERUSALEM, (PIC)-- Dr. Sheikh Ekrema Sabri, Chairman of the Supreme Islamic Council in Occupied Jerusalem, and Bishop Attalla Hanna, Greek Orthodox Archbishop of Sebastia, have called on the world’s Muslims and Christians to take serious action against Israeli ongoing offensives and genocides against Gaza civilians.
Sabri and Hanna called on the world’s free people to rally round Gazans and save them from the Israeli mass-carnages.
“On behalf of Jerusalemite Muslims and Christians, we are appealing to all world’s humane and considerate masses to rally in protest at Israeli terrorism and in solidarity with the blood-spattered Gaza.”
Share:

Israel: Palestinians Are All Terrorists & We Are All Mentally Ill


Ministry Warns against Israeli Attempts to Depict Abu Khdeir’s Murderers as Mentally Ill

RAMALLAH, July 9, 2014 – (WAFA) – Foreign Ministry warned Wednesday against Israeli government’s attempts to mislead international community by claiming that Mohammad Abu Khdeir’s murderers were ‘mentally ill’.
“Israel frequently comes out with such allegations each time an Israeli murders a Palestinian or more. It alleges that the perpetrator is mentally ill, taking the first step to acquit him of his crime against the Palestinians. Accordingly, Israel does not prosecute, imprison or punish Israeli perpetrators for murdering Palestinians,” said the Ministry.
The Ministry considered this Israeli misleading as tantamount to rewarding, encouraging and offering safe harbor to such perpetrators and criminals. Israel has frequently resorted to such an allegation “to protect Jewish terrorists, whose hands are drenched in the blood of innumerable Palestinian civilians.”
The ministry warned Israel against resorting to this allegation as an outlet and urged the international community to watch out for such ploys and maneuvers.
Share:

Can you tell the difference between an Israeli and a Palestinian?

Adam Shurati, left, and Hadas Maor in the picture chosen for Suter's project


By Dalia Karpel, Haaretz Correspondent

The advertisement published in Haaretz in March read "Wanted: people who look alike," and promised NIS 8,000 to anyone that could locate someone who looked like one of the eight people featured in the advertisement.

What the advertisement didn't say, was that the eight people pictured were Palestinians.

The ad was made by Swiss artist Olivier Suter, as part of his project 'Enemies', which focused on the absurd ways people identify "the other".
Advertisement
The advertisement is similar to a project Suter performed in Belgium, which asked viewers if they could dfferentiate between Flemish and French speakers.

Out of the dozens of photos he received, Suter picked a photo of an Israeli girl and a Palestinian boy who looked alike. The girl is one Hadas Maor, whose photo was sent in by her father, geography professor Yehuda Keidar.

Keidar, a long-time supporter of a two-state solution said "[David] Ben-Gurion was right when he said 'The Palestinians are not our cousins, they're our brothers. Turns out, they could be twins."

The Palestinian boy is named Adam Shurati and he was none too pleased about his likeness to a girl, according to his mother Nancy. Adam was further dismayed when his mother took him to have his hair cut to look like Hadas'.

Nancy, who lives in Bet Hanina, called the project "amazing" and said that her son's resemblance to an Israel girl surprised her.

"The project is a work of art meant for all of us, not just for the sake of art," Suter said.

Suter's next "Enemies" project will take place in Rwanda and the Congo.
Share:

Our Sunday Will Come


http://www.bintjbeil.com/A/araa/2004/images/palestinian_christians.jpghttp://www.bintjbeil.com/A/araa/2004/images/palestinian_christians.jpghttp://www.bintjbeil.com/A/araa/2004/images/palestinian_christians.jpg
Palestinian-Christians die also
just like Jesus


On the cross
and
at the crossroad


The man of Nazareth
the son of Mary
the carpenter who walked on the waters
has been found guilty of universalism
and of socialism.
The bankers at the temple want their revenge.


His liberation movement
shall be declared as illegal and anti-Semite
and his followers shall be thrown to the lions
or bombed by the phosphoric-devils.


This afternoon just before the Sabbath's begin ,
he shall be put on a Cross up on a Hill
wearing our crown.


As for us ,
we shall sit and wait for the Sunday morning
our Sunday-morning shall come !!!


Raja
Share:

Zionism is the problem

The Zionist ideal of a Jewish state is keeping Israelis and Palestinians from living in peace.

By Ben Ehrenreich

It's hard to imagine now, but in 1944, six years after Kristallnacht, Lessing J. Rosenwald, president of the American Council for Judaism, felt comfortable equating the Zionist ideal of Jewish statehood with "the concept of a racial state -- the Hitlerian concept." For most of the last century, a principled opposition to Zionism was a mainstream stance within American Judaism.Even after the foundation of Israel, anti-Zionism was not a particularly heretical position. Assimilated Reform Jews like Rosenwald believed that Judaism should remain a matter of religious rather than political allegiance; the ultra-Orthodox saw Jewish statehood as an impious attempt to "push the hand of God"; and Marxist Jews -- my grandparents among them -- tended to see Zionism, and all nationalisms, as a distraction from the more essential struggle between classes.

To be Jewish, I was raised to believe, meant understanding oneself as a member of a tribe that over and over had been cast out, mistreated, slaughtered. Millenniums of oppression that preceded it did not entitle us to a homeland or a right to self-defense that superseded anyone else's. If they offered us anything exceptional, it was a perspective on oppression and an obligation born of the prophetic tradition: to act on behalf of the oppressed and to cry out at the oppressor.

For the last several decades, though, it has been all but impossible to cry out against the Israeli state without being smeared as an anti-Semite, or worse. To question not just Israel's actions, but the Zionist tenets on which the state is founded, has for too long been regarded an almost unspeakable blasphemy.

Yet it is no longer possible to believe with an honest conscience that the deplorable conditions in which Palestinians live and die in Gaza and the West Bank come as the result of specific policies, leaders or parties on either side of the impasse. The problem is fundamental: Founding a modern state on a single ethnic or religious identity in a territory that is ethnically and religiously diverse leads inexorably either to politics of exclusion (think of the 139-square-mile prison camp that Gaza has become) or to wholesale ethnic cleansing. Put simply, the problem is Zionism.

It has been argued that Zionism is an anachronism, a leftover ideology from the era of 19th century romantic nationalisms wedged uncomfortably into 21st century geopolitics. But Zionism is not merely outdated. Even before 1948, one of its basic oversights was readily apparent: the presence of Palestinians in Palestine. That led some of the most prominent Jewish thinkers of the last century, many of them Zionists, to balk at the idea of Jewish statehood. The Brit Shalom movement -- founded in 1925 and supported at various times by Martin Buber, Hannah Arendt and Gershom Scholem -- argued for a secular, binational state in Palestine in which Jews and Arabs would be accorded equal status. Their concerns were both moral and pragmatic. The establishment of a Jewish state, Buber feared, would mean "premeditated national suicide."

The fate Buber foresaw is upon us: a nation that has lived in a state of war for decades, a quarter-million Arab citizens with second-class status and more than 5 million Palestinians deprived of the most basic political and human rights. If two decades ago comparisons to the South African apartheid system felt like hyperbole, they now feel charitable. The white South African regime, for all its crimes, never attacked the Bantustans with anything like the destructive power Israel visited on Gaza in December and January, when nearly1,300 Palestinians were killed, one-third of them children.

Israeli policies have rendered the once apparently inevitable two-state solution less and less feasible. Years of Israeli settlement construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem have methodically diminished the viability of a Palestinian state. Israel's new prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has even refused to endorse the idea of an independent Palestinian state, which suggests an immediate future of more of the same: more settlements, more punitive assaults.

All of this has led to a revival of the Brit Shalom idea of a single, secular binational state in which Jews and Arabs have equal political rights. The obstacles are, of course, enormous. They include not just a powerful Israeli attachment to the idea of an exclusively Jewish state, but its Palestinian analogue: Hamas' ideal of Islamic rule. Both sides would have to find assurance that their security was guaranteed. What precise shape such a state would take -- a strict, vote-by-vote democracy or a more complex federalist system -- would involve years of painful negotiation, wiser leaders than now exist and an uncompromising commitment from the rest of the world, particularly from the United States.

Meanwhile, the characterization of anti-Zionism as an "epidemic" more dangerous than anti-Semitism reveals only the unsustainability of the position into which Israel's apologists have been forced. Faced with international condemnation, they seek to limit the discourse, to erect walls that delineate what can and can't be said.

It's not working. Opposing Zionism is neither anti-Semitic nor particularly radical. It requires only that we take our own values seriously and no longer, as the book of Amos has it, "turn justice into wormwood and hurl righteousness to the ground."

Establishing a secular, pluralist, democratic government in Israel and Palestine would of course mean the abandonment of the Zionist dream. It might also mean the only salvation for the Jewish ideals of justice that date back to Jeremiah.
Share:

Israeli rabbis to Olmert: "It doesn't matter if you kill millions of Palestinians

You will not hear members of the US Congress condemn these men, or their blood thirst. You will not hear them called either "terrorists" or "extremists" or "fanatics" which is what they are.

You will not hear calls to close the Jewish schools in Israel because this is what they teach. You wont have the US State Department writing their text books, attempting to re-write their Talmud.

You wont hear the truth from their scholars and rabbis who seldom admit they lost
or destroyed the Torah, and rewrote another of their own. They wrote these calls for
mass murder. No God would ever condone collective punishment and massacres and theft.

They are lying on God. They attempted to killed Jesus
because he told the world what they were up to, and both David and Jesus
cursed the ancient Jewish rabbis and their courts.

This fanaticism is why the Jewish settlers feel that they can attack
Palestinians, kill them and destroy their property. This is what the US Congress supports.

There are few people who will admit the seriousness of this problem. If this is Judaism, it means that these
people are not capable of co-existing with non Jews, and they are not capable of abiding by any law other than an ancient code of barbaric conduct that ultimately led them into captivity in Babylon.

If this is not Judaism, then the Jews who are living in the 21st century should speak out and condemn this form of fanatical, terrorist, extremist Judaism.

Neither Steven Emerson, nor Daniel Pipes ever ventured to tell us that all of the lies they told on Islam,
were the truth about their brand of Judaism. We should also make every attempt to see that the rabbis that
issued such rulings as the ones mentioned here, before or after the illegal war on Gaza, are also tried in
courts of international law.

They have frightened, bullied and silenced the world with these bullying lies and claims of "chosen" and "divine authority."

They will never frighten Muslims, or deter our quest for justice, which includes bringing these people to justice for what they have done in Gaza. (Opinion added by Anisa Abd el Fattah)



GAZA, (PIC)-- A report issued by the Saudi Al-Watan news paper revealed Saturday that Jewish rabbis in the Zionist entity have issued a religious edict allowing the killing of Palestinian women and children and exonerating every Jew doing such horrible thing.

According to the paper, the rabbis opined that the Israeli massacres in Gaza Strip falls in line with Jewish teachings that consider such killing as "mass punishment to the enemies".

The paper also added that one of the rabbis opined that there would be no problem at all in exterminating the Palestinian people even if one million or more of them were killed at the hands of the occupation troops.

Citing verses from the Book of Geneses, Jewish rabbi Mordachi Elyaho, who is the religious reference of the popular religious current in the Zionist entity sent outgoing Israeli premier Ehud Olmert a weekly leaflet containing articles allowing the Jews to carryout the idea of massive punishment against the enemies in accordance with the ethics of war in the Torah, the paper pointed out.

"This standard could also be applied to the case of Gaza as all Gaza inhabitants bear the responsibility because they didn't do anything to stop the firing of Qassam Brigades" said Elyaho in his letter to Olmert, urging him to continue the military aggression on the Palestinians because "harming innocent Palestinians was a legitimate matter."

Yesrael Rozin, another fanatic rabbi, was also quoted as saying that law of the Torah stipulates the killing of men, children, women, elderly, infants, and animals [of the enemy], the paper furthermore added.

For his part, Safad rabbi Sholomo Elyaho underlined, "If we kill 100 of them but they refuse to halt this [firing of rockets] them we should kill 1000; and if we kill 1000 of them but they didn't stop, then we should kill 10000 of them, and we must continue killing them even if they reach one million and despite the time spent in killing them".

"The Psalms says "I should continue chasing my enemies and arrest them, and I won't cease till I finish them completely", the rabbi said according to the report.

Share:

When Israel expelled Palestinians: A Thought experiment

Randall Kuhn
In the wake of Israel's invasion of Gaza, Israel's Defense Minister Ehud Barak made this analogy: "Think about what would happen if for seven years rockets had been fired at San Diego, California from Tijuana, Mexico."

Within hours scores of American pundits and politicians had mimicked Barak's comparisons almost verbatim. In fact, in this very paper on January 9 House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer and House Minority Whip Eric Cantor ended an opinion piece by saying "America would never sit still if terrorists were lobbing missiles across our border into Texas or Montana." But let's see if our political and pundit class can parrot this analogy.Think about what would happen if San Diego expelled most of its Hispanic,
African American, Asian American, and Native American population, about 48
percent of the total, and forcibly relocated them to Tijuana? Not just
immigrants, but even those who have lived in this country for many
generations. Not just the unemployed or the criminals or the America haters,
but the school teachers, the small business owners, the soldiers, even the
baseball players.

What if we established government and faith-based agencies to help move
white people into their former homes? And what if we razed hundreds of their
homes in rural areas and, with the aid of charitable donations from people
in the United States and abroad, planted forests on their former towns,
creating nature preserves for whites to enjoy? Sounds pretty awful, huh? I
may be called anti-Semitic for speaking this truth. Well, I'm Jewish and the
scenario above is what many prominent Israeli scholars say happened when
Israel expelled Palestinians from southern Israel and forced them into Gaza.
But this analogy is just getting started.

What if the United Nations kept San Diego's discarded minorities in crowded,
festering camps in Tijuana for 19 years? Then, the United States invaded
Mexico, occupied Tijuana and began to build large housing developments in
Tijuana where only whites could live.

And what if the United States built a network of highways connecting
American citizens of Tijuana to the United States? And checkpoints, not just
between Mexico and the United States but also around every neighborhood of
Tijuana? What if we required every Tijuana resident, refugee or native, to
show an ID card to the U.S. military on demand? What if thousands of Tijuana
residents lost their homes, their jobs, their businesses, their children,
their sense of self worth to this occupation? Would you be surprised to hear
of a protest movement in Tijuana that sometimes became violent and hateful?
Okay, now for the unbelievable part.

Think about what would happen if, after expelling all of the minorities from
San Diego to Tijuana and subjecting them to 40 years of brutal military
occupation, we just left Tijuana, removing all the white settlers and the
soldiers? Only instead of giving them their freedom, we built a 20-foot tall
electrified wall around Tijuana? Not just on the sides bordering San Diego,
but on all the Mexico crossings as well. What if we set up 50-foot high
watchtowers with machine gun batteries, and told them that if they stood
within 100 yards of this wall we would shoot them dead on sight? And four
out of every five days we kept every single one of those border crossings
closed, not even allowing food, clothing, or medicine to arrive. And we
patrolled their air space with our state-of-the-art fighter jets but didn't
allow them so much as a crop duster. And we patrolled their waters with
destroyers and submarines, but didn't even allow them to fish.

Would you be at all surprised to hear that these resistance groups in
Tijuana, even after having been "freed" from their occupation but starved
half to death, kept on firing rockets at the United States? Probably not.
But you may be surprised to learn that the majority of people in Tijuana
never picked up a rocket, or a gun, or a weapon of any kind.

The majority, instead, supported against all hope negotiations toward a
peaceful solution that would provide security, freedom and equal rights to
both people in two independent states living side by side as neighbors. This
is the sound analogy to Israel's military onslaught in Gaza today. Maybe
some day soon, common sense will prevail and no corpus of misleading
analogies abut Tijuana or the crazy guy across the hall who wants to murder
your daughter will be able to obscure the truth. And at that moment, in a
country whose people shouted We Shall Overcome, Ich bin ein Berliner, End
Apartheid, Free Tibet and Save Darfur, we will all join together and shout
"Free Gaza. Free Palestine." And because we are Americans, the world will
take notice and they will be free, and perhaps peace will prevail for all
the residents of the Holy Land.

Randall Kuhn is an assistant professor and Director of the Global Health
Affairs Program at the University of Denver Josef Korbel School of
International Studies. He just returned from a trip to Israel and the West
Share:

The United States Promotes Israeli Genocide Against the Palestinians

Professor Francis A. Boyle

As long ago as October 19, 2000, the then United Nations Human Rights Commission (now Council) condemned Israel for inflicting "war crimes" and "crimes against humanity" upon the Palestinian people, most of whom are Muslims. The reader has a general idea of what a war crime is, so I am not going to elaborate upon that term here. But there are different degrees of heinousness for war crimes. In particular are the more serious war crimes denominated "grave breaches" of the Fourth
Geneva Convention.Since the outbreak of the first Intifada in 1987,the world has seen those heinous war crimes inflicted every day by Israel against the Palestinian people living in occupied Palestine: e.g., willful killing of Palestinian civilians by the Israeli army and by Israel's illegal paramilitary settlers.

These Israeli "grave breaches" of the Fourth Geneva Convention mandate universal prosecution for the perpetrators and their commanders, whether military or civilian,
including and especially Israel's political leaders.

But I want to focus for a moment on Israel's "crimes against
humanity" against the Palestinian people-as determined by the U.N. Human
Rights Commission itself, set up pursuant to the requirements of the
United Nations Charter. What are "crimes against humanity"? This
concept goes all the way back to the Nuremberg Charter of 1945 for the
trial of the major Nazi war criminals in Europe. In the Nuremberg
Charter of 1945, drafted by the United States Government, there was
created and inserted a new type of international crime specifically
intended to deal with the Nazi persecution of the Jewish people:

Crimes against humanity: namely, murder, extermination, enslavement,
deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian
population, before or during the war, or persecutions on political,
racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any
crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in
violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated.

The paradigmatic example of "crimes against humanity" is
what Hitler and the Nazis did to the Jewish people. This is where the
concept of "crimes against humanity" came from. And this is what the
U.N. Human Rights Commission determined that Israel is currently doing
to the Palestinian people: crimes against humanity. Expressed in legal
terms, this is just like what Hitler and the Nazis did to the Jews.
That is the significance of the formal determination by the U.N. Human
Rights Commission that Israel has inflicted "crimes against humanity"
upon the Palestinian people. The Commission chose this well-known and
long-standing legal term of art quite carefully and deliberately based
upon the evidence it had compiled.

Furthermore, the Nuremberg "crimes against humanity" are the
historical and legal precursor to the international crime of genocide as
defined by the 1948 Genocide Convention. The theory here was that what
Hitler and the Nazis did to the Jewish people was so horrific that it
required a special international treaty that would codify and
universalize the Nuremberg concept of "crimes against humanity." And
that treaty ultimately became the 1948 Genocide Convention.

Article II of the Genocide Convention defines the
international crime of genocide in relevant part as follows:

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts
committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national,
ethnical, racial or religious group as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated
to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

....

As documented by Israeli historian Ilan Pappe in his seminal
book The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine (2006), Israel's genocidal policy
against the Palestinians has been unremitting, extending from before the
very foundation of the State of Israel in 1948, and is ongoing and even
intensifying against the 1.5 million Palestinians living in Gaza.
Zionism's "final solution" to Israel's much touted "demographic threat"
allegedly posed by the very existence of the Palestinians has always
been genocide.

Certainly, Israel and its predecessors-in-law-the Zionist
agencies, forces, and terrorist gangs-have committed genocide against
the Palestinian people that actually started on or about 1948 and has
continued apace until today in violation of Genocide Convention Articles
II(a), (b), and (c). For at least the past six decades, the Israeli
government and its predecessors-in-law-the Zionist agencies, forces, and
terrorist gangs-have ruthlessly implemented a systematic and
comprehensive military, political, and economic campaign with the intent
to destroy in substantial part the national, ethnical, racial, and
different religious (Jews versus Muslims and Christians) group
constituting the Palestinian people. This Zionist/Israeli campaign has
consisted of killing members of the Palestinian people in violation of
Genocide Convention Article II(a). This Zionist/Israeli campaign has
also caused serious bodily and mental harm to the Palestinian people in
violation of Genocide Convention Article II(b). This Zionist/Israeli
campaign has also deliberately inflicted on the Palestinian people
conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction
in substantial part in violation of Article II(c) of the Genocide
Convention.

Article I of the Genocide Convention requires all
contracting parties such as the United States "to prevent and to punish"
genocide. Yet to the contrary, historically the "Jewish" state's
criminal conduct against the Palestinians has been financed, armed,
equipped, supplied and politically supported by the "Christian" United
States. Although the United States is a founding sponsor of, and a
contracting party to, both the Nuremberg Charter and the Genocide
Convention, as well as the United Nations Charter, these legal facts
have never made any difference to the United States when it comes to its
blank-check support for Israel and their joint and severable criminal
mistreatment of the Palestinians-truly the wretched of the earth!

The world has not yet heard even one word uttered by the
United States and its NATO allies in favor of "humanitarian
intervention" against Israel in order to protect the Palestinian people,
let alone a "responsibility to protect" the Palestinians from
Zionist/Israeli genocide. The United States, its NATO allies, and the
Great Powers on the U.N. Security Council would not even dispatch a U.N.
Charter Chapter 6 monitoring force to help protect the Palestinians, let
alone even contemplate any type of U.N. Charter Chapter 7 enforcement
actions against Israel - shudder the thought!. The doctrine of
"humanitarian intervention" so readily espoused elsewhere when U.S.
foreign policy goals are allegedly at stake has been clearly proved to
be a joke and a fraud when it comes to stopping the ongoing and
accelerating Israeli campaign of genocide against the Palestinian
people.

Rather than rein in the Israelis-which would be possible
just by turning off the funding pipeline-the United States government,
the U.S. Congress, and U.S. taxpayers instead support the "Jewish" state
to the tune of about 4 billion dollars per year, without whose
munificence this instance of genocide - and indeed conceivably the State
of Israel itself - would not be possible. What the world witnesses here
is (yet another) case of "dishumanitarian intervention" or "humanitarian
extermination" by the United States and Israel against the Palestinians
and Palestine. In today's world genocide pays so long as it is done at
the behest of the United States and its de jure or de facto allies such
as Israel.

Of course miracles can always happen. But I anticipate no
fundamental change in America's support for the Israeli campaign of
genocide against the Palestinians during the tenure of the Obama/Clinton
administration.
Share:

So What Have The Palestinians Got To Complain About?

To portray this as a conflict between equals requires some imagination

By Mark Steel:

When you read the statements from Israeli and US politicians, and try to match them with the pictures of devastation, there seems to be only one explanation. They must have one of those conditions, called something like "Visual Carnage Responsibility Back To Front Upside Down Massacre Disorder".
For example, Condoleezza Rice, having observed that more than 300 Gazans were dead, said: "We are deeply concerned about the escalating violence. We strongly condemn the attacks on Israel and hold Hamas responsible." Someone should ask her to comment on teenage knife-crime, to see if she'd say: "I strongly condemn the people who've been stabbed, and until they abandon their practice of wandering around clutching their sides and bleeding, there is no hope for peace."

The Israeli government suffers terribly from this confusion. They probably have adverts on Israeli television in which a man falls off a ladder and screams, "Eeeeugh", then a voice says, "Have you caused an accident at work in the last 12 months?" and the bloke who pushed him gets £3,000.

The gap between the might of Israel's F-16 bombers and Apache helicopters, and the Palestinians' catapulty thing is so ridiculous that to try and portray the situation as between two equal sides requires the imagination of a children's story writer.

The reporter on News at Ten said the rockets "may be ineffective, but they ARE symbolic." So they might not have weapons but they have got symbolism, the canny brutes.

It's no wonder the Israeli Air Force had to demolish a few housing estates, otherwise Hamas might have tried to mock Israel through a performance of expressive dance.

The rockets may be unable to to kill on the scale of the Israeli Air Force, said one spokesman, but they are "intended to kill".

Maybe he went on: "And we have evidence that Hamas supporters have dreams, and that in these dreams bad things happen to Israeli citizens, they burst, or turn into cactus, or run through Woolworths naked, so it's not important whether it can happen, what matters is that they WANT it to happen, so we blew up their university."

Or there's the outrage that Hamas has been supported by Iran. Well that's just breaking the rules. Because say what you will about the Israelis, they get no arms supplies or funding or political support from a country that's more powerful than them, they just go their own way and make all their weapons in an arts and crafts workshop in Jerusalem.

But mostly the Israelis justify themselves with a disappointing lack of imagination, such as the line that they had to destroy an ambulance because Hamas cynically put their weapons inside ambulances.

They should be more creative, and say Hamas were planning to aim the flashing blue light at Israeli epileptics in an attempt to make them go into a fit, get dizzy and wander off into Syria where they would be captured.

But they prefer a direct approach, such as the statement from Ofer Schmerling, an Israeli Civil Defence official who said on al-Jazeera, "I shall play music and celebrate what the Israeli Air Force is doing."
Maybe they could turn it into a huge nationalfestival, with decorations and mince pies and shops playing "I Wish We Could Bomb Gaza Every Day".

In a similar tone Dov Weisglas, Ariel Sharon's chief of staff, referred to the siege of Gaza that preceded this bombing, a siege in which the Israelis prevented the population from receiving essential supplies of food, medicine, electricity and water, by saying, "We put them on a diet."

It's the arrogance of the East End gangster, so it wouldn't be out of character if the Israeli Prime Minister's press conference began: "Oh dear or dear. It looks like those Palestinians have had a little, er, accident. All their buildings have been knocked down – they want to be more careful, hee hee."

And almost certainly one of the reasons this is happening now is because the government wants to appear hard as it wants to win an election. Maybe with typical Israeli frankness they'll show a party political broadcast in which Ehud Olmert says, "This is why I think you should vote for me", then shows film of Gaza and yells: "Wa-hey, that bloke in the corner is on FIRE."

And Condoleezza Rice and her colleagues, and the specially appointed Middle East Peace Envoy, could then all shake their heads and say: "Disgraceful. The way he's flapping around like that could cause someone to have a nasty accident."
Share:

Why are Palestinians reacting against Israel ?

Israeli soldiers passing out candy to the kids





Making sure they get to school.

Helping Ladies across the street..






Providing childcare.






Allowing them a place to rest (permanently)







Access to Healthcare.





Construction projects (demolition)








Respecting American and British pacifist resisters

(such as American Rachel Corrie)








And others.





And if you are not satisfied, now, with the truth the following

pictures are war crimes as defined by the UN,

The Hague and the Geneva Convention.


Using images of your enemy dead or alive (violation)





Human shields (violation)





Live Buri al Torture (violation)





And as a last resort, Execution (violation)






These IDF soldiers have faces... I can clearly see them

...Cant you? Why are they not being prosecuted?

Because it is systematic process that is driven by

the government designed to force the people

of Palestine into exile so Israel can claim all the land

and resources.


This where my American tax dollars are going, do you know

where your tax dollars are at? TAKE THE TIME TO FIND THE TRUTH.

So many lives depend on it. I, like so many Americans, am Caucasian,

non-Arab, and religious. I can no longer sit back with good

conscience and do nothing while my government is supporting

the types of terrorist actions that we have condemned Muslim

Fundamentalist for. Call your Congressman and Senator,

send an email to the White House and demand that our

government negotiate FAIRLY with both sides and bring

a fair and just solution to Palestine and Israel .



CRUELTY OF ISRAELsave
Share:

Civilians Are Paying the Price in Gaza’

By Haider Rizvi

International aid groups, including several United Nations agencies, are warning of a humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza if Israel does not stop its military action there immediately."The consequences of [further] military action by Israel would be disastrous," said Jeremy Hobbs, director of Oxfam International, a London-based aid organisation that is providing food and water for Palestinians affected by the Israeli blockade.

Hundreds of thousands of people in Gaza depend on Oxfam and other international aid agencies for the basics of life -- clean water, food and sanitation. Before the recent Israeli bombing campaign, Gaza had been cut off from the outside world for 19 months.

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) is also expressing similar concerns about the humanitarian situation in Gaza. The group says hospitals are "overwhelmed and unable to cope with the scale and type of injuries that keep coming in."

More than 300 hundred Palestinians are reported to have been killed -- and nearly 1,000 wounded -- since the Israeli air force began bombing Gaza Saturday.

"Our first priority is to get more medical supplies to the hospitals right away," said ICRC’s Pierre Wettach. "It is therefore essential that this urgent humanitarian assistance is allowed to enter Gaza."

Before the recent attacks on Gaza, aid organisations had repeatedly stressed that the Israeli blockade of Gaza was hindering their efforts to reach out to Palestinians who were in dire need of food and medicines.

Currently, nearly half of the population in Gaza does not have enough food to meet its basic needs. A majority of the population are refugees who were driven out of their homes by the Israeli occupation in 1948.

In a statement, Oxfam and other aid agencies -- including CARE International, Medico, and Diakonia -- said the Israeli aerial assaults on Gaza had further complicated their relief efforts in the territory and noted that it was causing more suffering to the innocent.

"The blockade is illegal and constitutes collective punishment of ordinary men, women, and children," said Diakonia’s Christoffer Sjoholm, who, although critical of Palestinian rocket attacks, condemned Israel’s plans to carry out further attacks on Gaza.

Oxfam says it wants world leaders to push the Israelis to open all crossing points into Gaza so food, water and medical supplies can pass through and provide immediate relief to affected citizens.

On Monday, the U.N. Children’s Fund (UNICEF) expressed deep concerns about the impact of the Israeli aerial attacks and demanded that the Jewish state must allow the humanitarian supplies to enter.

U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon also called for Israel to take such actions.

"The frightening nature of what is happening on the ground, in particular, its effects on children who are more than half of the population, troubles me greatly," Ban said. "I have continuously stressed the need for strict observance of international humanitarian law."

According to the U.N., last Sunday about 60 truck loads of supplies were allowed to enter Gaza. However, U.N. Chief for Relief Operations John Holms has warned that the increasing death toll could create an overwhelming affect on humanitarian efforts.

A statement released Tuesday by the World Health Organisation (WHO) indicates that many more deaths are likely as hospitals in Gaza are lacking sufficient medical supplies.

"The ability of the hospitals to cope with a problem of this magnitude, if the situation continued unchanged, will result in surge in preventable death," a UNICEF spokesperson said in a statement. "Civilians are paying the price for a long blockade."

In addition to other U.N. agencies and independent aid organisations, UNICEF is currently trying to persuade the Israeli authorities to allow safe passage for the supply of medical and food items.

In recent days, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) has repeatedly expressed its concern over the Israeli efforts to stop aid supplies. The agency stresses that days and weeks before the current military action the blockade was already hurting some 1.5 million people.

In a statement, UNRWA’s head Karen Abu-Zayad said she was horrified by the current situation in Gaza and wanted the Israeli government to heed calls for ceasing its bombardment of Gaza.

Meanwhile, a U.N. spokesperson told reporters in New York that the Middle East Quartet -- comprised of the U.N., the European Union, Russia, and U.S. - - held a teleconference Tuesday to discuss the situation in Gaza. During that teleconference the Quartet, called for an "immediate ceasefire".

Stressing that the Quartet statement is not yet official, Marie Okabe, Ban’s deputy spokesperson, said that, the Quartet has "called on all parties to address the serious humanitarian and economic needs in Gaza and to take necessary measures to ensure the continuous provision of humanitarian supplies."
Share:

Urgent appeal for resettlement of ex-Iraq Palestinians

his is a summary of what was said by UNHCR spokesperson Ron Redmond – to whom quoted text may be attributed – at the press briefing, on 14 October 2008, at the Palais des Nations in Geneva.In the lead up to UNHCR's bi-yearly informal consultations with resettlement countries tomorrow (Wednesday 15 Oct.), UNHCR has issued an urgent appeal for the resettlement of Palestinian refugees. Most have been stranded for over two years in two camps at the Iraq-Syrian border and in Baghdad, while a small group has been stranded in Al Hol camp in Syria.

Of the estimated 34,000 Palestinians in Iraq in 2003, less than 15,000 remain in Iraq – including 2,943 Palestinian refugees currently living in the border camps at the Iraq-Syrian border. Of those in the border camps, 358 families (1,278 persons) are considered to be highly vulnerable – having life-threatening diseases, needing urgent medical treatment or fearing persecution if they return – and therefore are in urgent need of resettlement.

The majority fled Baghdad since 2003 because of threats, torture, detention, or after friends and family members were killed. The steady drain on financial resources has forced middle class families into the ranks of the poor, needing housing, food, medical, and cash assistance.

The refugees in the camps are particularly vulnerable because of their non-admission (Al Waleed Camp and Al Tanf Camp) or temporary admission (Al Hol Camp) into Syrian territory and their fear of persecution if they return. Moreover, living conditions at the border camps are extremely difficult, unsafe and continue to deteriorate. Refugees face extreme temperatures and regular sandstorms in the desert camps. There is a minimum of security. In Al Waleed camp, the health of refugees continues to deteriorate as medical services are limited. There are open sewage pits near tents and cooking facilities. The nearest medical facility is 400 kms away and there is no ambulance service. All the camps depend entirely on assistance from UNHCR and its partners such as the International Committee of the Red Cross, for all of whom access remains very difficult.

In recent years, UNHCR has actively sought solutions for these refugees, such as resettlement inside or outside the region. Between 2006 and 2008, a total of 381 people were resettled, most to non-traditional resettlement countries such as Brazil and Chile. Smaller numbers left for Denmark, the Netherlands, Iceland, New Zealand and Canada. Another small group is about to leave for Sweden.

This, however, remains insufficient and with conditions deteriorating UNHCR once again calls for urgent actions from resettlement countries all over the world. UNHCR holds twice-a-year informal consultations with resettlement countries and yearly consultations between resettlement countries and non-governmental organizations. Flash appeals for urgent resettlement are only issued when specific attention is required for a specific problem.
Share:

Israel 'dividing up Palestinians'

Two Israeli rights groups have accused their government of tearing Palestinian families apart by curtailing the right to live in the West Bank.

Hamoked and B'tselem say the Israeli military has stepped up efforts to expel Palestinians with "illegal status" from the West Bank to Gaza.

B'tselem said several thousand Palestinians had been affected by the policy since November 2007.

The Israeli government has not directly commented on the groups' report.

However, Israeli foreign ministry spokesman Andy David said the failure of the Palestinian Hamas movement to recognise past peace accords with Israel was the "real reason" for
restrictions on movement between the West Bank and Gaza. 'Illegal aliens'
The groups say that over the past year, the military "has taken active measures to locate and expel Palestinians from the West Bank to the Gaza Strip under the pretext that they are 'illegal aliens'".

They say Israel has instituted a policy requiring Palestinians from Gaza who are living in the West Bank to apply for a temporary three-month permit to stay there.

"This, even if they have lived in the West Bank for many years, established their homes there and, in some cases, even if they were born in the West Bank," the report says.

It says Palestinians wishing to enter Gaza must undertake never to return to the West Bank, an effect of which has been to force relatives left behind to also move to Gaza "with no possibility of returning to the West Bank".

The report accuses Israel of "exploiting the hardship of families which are split between the West Bank and Gaza Strip".

The groups say marriage between Gazans and Palestinians from the West Bank is no guarantee for obtaining a permit.

"The new permit regime is an unprecedented, legally baseless move by which Israel is turning Palestinian residents of the Occupied Palestinian Territories into 'illegal aliens' in their own homes," the report says.
Share:

Arabs, Muslims and Palestinians have the same position

by Ghassan Khatib

The future of Jerusalem has yet again presented itself as one of the most difficult issues in final status negotiations. This is not to say that other issues are either easy or have already been resolved, but the issues of Jerusalem and refugees appear the hardest to crack.

Of course, the issues under negotiation are mostly interrelated. Jerusalem cannot be fully resolved without resolving the issue of borders. The city was divided into east and west by the 1967 border and the eastern side continues to constitute occupied territory under international law. Nor can any resolution of Jerusalem be reached without at least some resolution to the issue of settlements, since a majority of Israel's illegal settlements in occupied territory are in Jerusalem and its environs. There is also a religious dimension to Jerusalem that centers on the status of the Old City. One lesson that came out of the Camp David negotiations over Jerusalem is that the issue is not merely of paramount importance to Palestinians but also to the wider Arab and Muslim world. The late president Yasser Arafat used the Arab and Muslim dimension to the issue to underscore the fact that it was not in his power to make concessions over the city in negotiations with Israel.

Israelis, however, seem to have misunderstood this position to mean that Palestinians might make concessions over Jerusalem if the Arab and Muslim world could be persuaded to accept this. Thus, many Israelis concluded, if the Arab and Muslim position on Jerusalem could be neutralized, the Palestinian leadership would be freed to take a "more flexible" position.

There are two obvious misperceptions that need to be corrected in this conclusion. The first is to underline that Arabs and Muslims are in complete agreement with the Palestinian leadership on the issue of Jerusalem as well as other aspects related to negotiations between Israel and Palestinians. The basis of this common position is very simple: there is a need, in accordance with international law and United Nations resolutions, to end the occupation of all territory taken in the 1967 war. This includes East Jerusalem.

The other is to point out that this agreement, based on the principle of international law, means that it is neither the case that Palestinians will not concede over Jerusalem because Arabs and Muslims won't let them nor that Arabs and Muslims won't concede over Jerusalem because of Palestinians. There is no "concession" to make over the issue. As such, it is a major mistake by Israel to continue to ignore the Arab peace initiative, which clearly spells out the Arab position and reflects a consensus.

The recent Israeli suggestion to involve an Arab or Islamic dimension in the negotiations on Jerusalem and the concomitant invitation to certain Arab or Islamic parties is a result of the above misunderstanding. It is probably also a tactic to further delay progress in negotiations. Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has shown himself mostly interested in dragging out negotiations in order to prolong his own grip on power and avoid his domestic travails. Unfortunately, Tzipi Livni, the Israeli foreign minister and Olmert's likely successor, seems equally likely to want talks to continue as long as possible without result in order to prolong her own tenure. In other words, the conclusion that was reached by Ahmed Qurei, the chief Palestinian negotiator--that domestic Israeli political developments are not at all conducive to progress in the peace process--appears correct.

What Israelis need to understand is that neither the Palestinians nor the Arabs are willing to accept any kind of solution concerning borders, Jerusalem, settlements or refugees that gives Palestinians less than their rights according to international law. In other words, Israeli control over the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip constitute an illegal and belligerent military occupation that must end in full for conflict to end.- Published 8/9/2008 © bitterlemons.org

Ghassan Khatib is coeditor of the bitterlemons family of internet publications. He is vice-president of Birzeit University and a former Palestinian Authority minister of planning. He holds a PhD in Middle East politics from the
University of Durham.
Share:

Settler violence against Palestinians on the rise


Photo: Shabtai Gold/IRIN
Jamal, a Palestinian refugee in his mid-40s, stands in front of the Kiryat Arba settlement
HEBRON, 31 August 2008 (IRIN) - Violence by settlers perpetrated against Palestinians has been on the rise in recent weeks in Hebron and the surrounding areas, residents and international observers said.

[Read this report in Arabic]

"These areas are hot spots for violence and are priority areas for us," said Matteo Benatti, head of the International Committee of the Red Cross's (ICRC's) delegation in the city.

He was referring to H2, the part of Hebron under Israeli control, and the rural southern part of the district, also mostly under Israel's jurisdiction, according to the accords of the 1990s with the Palestinians.

"Day and night, night and day, it makes no difference, the settlers always abuse us," said Jamal, a Palestinian refugee in his mid-40s.

Given the city's violent history and perpetual troubles, the settlement in the middle of a Palestinian urban area, not surprisingly, attracts radical figures, some from France and the USA who migrated to Israel, who seem attracted to the friction.

Many of the settlers are armed and wield their rifles openly, taking Palestinians in their sights.

"Inside, inside," muttered a Palestinian mother from the neighbourhood of Wadi Hussein, as she pushed her young daughters indoors.

A moment earlier, armed youngsters from the Kiryat Arba settlement had thrown rocks and stones at the children playing outside, just after nightfall.

Having the strategic vantage point of being on a hill, while the Palestinians are in a valley, makes the rock-throwing easier.

Sliman, a 32- year-old father, rushed passed the children to confront the settlers, his chest suddenly lit up in red as the laser-guided sights on the rifles focused on him. More stone-throwing and cursing ensued before the settlers went away.

Damaged homes

Nearly all the Palestinian homes in Wadi Hussein visited by IRIN had incurred damage recently, including destroyed water tanks and countless broken windows.


Photo: Shabtai Gold/IRIN
Local residents say these solar water heaters were broken by stone-throwing settlers from Kiryat Arba settlement
"I don't have hot water any more," said Sliman, a refugee registered with UNRWA, the UN Agency responsible for Palestinians. "They threw stones and destroyed my solar water heater twice and I can't afford to fix it again."

Fuel for heating, he said, is very expensive and the Israeli-imposed restrictions on movement mean he cannot drive into Wadi Hussain, so everything is carried in, and gas bottles are heavy.

"For my sheep, I need 400kg of fodder each week. Each bag is 50 kilos and I bring it in, one at a time, on my back," he said.

Similarly, rural Palestinians say they have trouble accessing their land due to the violence.

The residents say Israel is failing to protect them: "I am under Israeli jurisdiction," said Abu Feras, a Palestinian man who lives just alongside the Worshippers' Road, the path that connects Kiryat Arba, the large settlement just outside Hebron, to the smaller settlement in the heart of the city.

"I expect the Israelis to protect me, my land, my children. They have a responsibility to me as an occupier," said the man, afraid to use his real name.

"If the [Israeli] police come down on them, the settlers will stop," he said, echoing sentiments by human rights workers like Issa Omer from B'tselem, an Israeli rights group.

Gathering evidence

B'tselem runs a programme called "Shooting Back" where it distributed cameras to Palestinians in areas like Hebron and the outskirts of Nablus, where violence is common. It hopes to gather as much evidence as possible to substantiate Palestinian claims and enhance their safety.


Photo: Shabtai Gold/IRIN
Palestinians say armed youngsters from the Kiryat Arba settlement throw rocks at them and their houses
Micky Rosenfeld, a spokesman for the police, told IRIN law enforcement officials were doing their utmost to end the violence. He said police officers investigated claims from both sides, adding that settlers also complained about their cars being stoned on roads in the Hebron area.

However, the police's efforts have not stopped the recent escalation, which has included attacks on aid workers, diplomats, children, elderly people, mosques and wedding parties, residents and international observers said.

"At first, five settlers came," said Fadi, who was attacked while at a wedding celebration on a Friday evening. "Then more came, with guns. They hit us."

While the Palestinians eventually banded together and purged the group from the ceremony, they literally paid the price.

"On Sunday we went to the police to complain. The settlers also then apparently filed a complaint against us, and the police fined us 2,000 shekels," he said. The amount is equal to more than $500 - more than Fadi earns in a month.

As the settlers continue their attempts to take over more Palestinian land - in some cases using force, in others with the legal backing of the Israeli authorities - one resident said he doubted the problems would subside.

"This place is a powder keg waiting to explode, just wait and see."
Share:

AP Exposed : They Were Trying To Cover UP Israel's Long History of Strip Searching Christian Evangelicals, Government Officials & Everyone Else

CounterPunch details AP cover-up on Israeli practice of strip searching civilians:
British Consul General, evangelicals, journalists, Americans, children...
http://windowintopalestine.blogspot.com/2008/07/letting-ap-in-on-secret-israeli-strip.html

A footnoted article in today’s CounterPunch details an Associated Press cover-up of Israel’s long-standing practice of strip searching civilians of all ages and both sexes, including the British Consul General, pregnant women, Christian evangelicals, international journalists, Americans, and children. In some cases eyewitnesses describe Israeli soldiers forcing Palestinians to strip naked and then shooting them dead. The article located here, “Israeli Strip Searches: Letting AP In On the Secret,” by media watchdog organization If Americans Knew, reveals that AP virtually never reported on what is, according to journalists from the region, a “widely accepted secret.” In fact, in a recent AP report that finally mentioned the practice (responding to external pressure to report on an internationally renowned journalist who had been forcibly strip searched at gunpoint), AP claimed that “allegations of strip searches are apparently unusual.”

On the contrary, according to the CounterPunch article:“…frequent, random humiliation by Israeli soldiers and officials is part of the Palestinian experience. Numerous degrading strip searches – some of them particularly grotesque – have been forced on Palestinian men, women, and children of all ages for decades.

“In addition, Israeli officials periodically strip-search others whenever, it appears, they wish, including:


* The British Consul General[i] (Israeli media reported that her search was “prolonged, needless and humiliating,” and that “by the end of the process Rogan was upset and had begun crying.”[ii];


* An American holocaust survivor (she was treated to a “cavity search”);[iii]


* Sixteen Christian evangelicals rounded up at gunpoint;[iv]


* Journalists from around the world (an Argentinean journalist wrote: “… they made me go to another office and strip naked. An official came in stands next to me, while I’m naked, with a machine gun in his hand…”[v] <#_edn5> A Swiss reporter was forced to remove her pants in public and stand in her underwear, hands raised, in front of an x-ray machine);[vi]


* A wheel-chair bound New Jersey woman with cerebral palsy whose sanitary pad was confiscated and which she was not allowed to replace, humiliating her publicly;[vii]


* An American doctoral student, who was also subjected to a cavity search[viii] … the list goes on and on.


“Yet, somehow, AP missed all of these. In fact, amazingly, a LexisNexis search of Associated Press stories over the past 10 years, using the search terms “Israel” and “strip search,” turns up not a single story that even mentioned Israeli strip-searches of civilians, diplomats, journalists, children, etc. In fact, there is only one result in the hundreds of thousands of stories AP issued on Israel-Palestine during the past ten years – a few stories on a hunger strike by Palestinian prisoners protesting against, among other things, their daily strip searches by Israeli guards.”

The article, by Alison Weir, states that If Americans Knew sent AP a 25-page document listing descriptions of Israeli strip-searches, with brief excerpts from each, and asked for a correction on their AP report. AP refused to comment.

Following are excerpts from this list (the entire document is available on the If Americans Knew website – Full url:http://www.ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/strip-searches.html ).

* In 2007 the Palestinian Minister of Women's Affairs issued a statement protesting the policy of Israeli soldiers taking Palestinian women “to separate rooms in the checkpoint and being forced to remove all clothes, to become fully naked." The minister demanded that the UN and the international community provide security for Palestinian women.[ix] <#_edn9>

* Even the New York Times (which justified it) reported about the Allenby border in 1987: “Before any visitor gets in, however, he must go through a stringent security check at the Israeli terminal. Besides being examined by metal detectors, each visitor must undergo a private strip search…”[x]

* A University of Utah law student describes a PhD student conducting research in the region who was detained at the border crossing for six hours, “Then a female guard conducted a strip/cavity search while two male guards observed.”[xi]

* A British researcher reports: “While men have also reported forms of sexual torture in jail, women prisoners are particularly vulnerable to this as a form of humiliation by their captors. Women are forced to strip naked in front of guards, many of whom are male, and subjected to brutal body searches. Many women prisoners have detailed sexual assault by Israeli military and prison staff. On some occasions women are detained as a way of threatening or putting pressure on a male member of the family.[xii]

* A Palestinian woman trying to reach a hospital reports: “…the labour pains grew stronger. I saw a lot of soldiers in front of me. I called out at them using the word “baby” which I think some understood. They started to talk to me in Hebrew as they pointed the guns towards me. They used signs and gestures. I understood that they wanted me to show them how pregnant I was which I did. One soldier asked me to take off my robe, which I did. But it was not sufficient and he asked me to remove the T-shirt and the trousers. I had no choice and I was ready to go as far as that in order to get to the hospital before it was late. He asked me to take off my underwear which I did. After this humiliation, they fetched a stretcher from one of the tanks. I was naked. I was carried to a tank and was given intravenous glucose into my arm. A few minutes later, they brought my father-in-law inside the tank. They drove for almost half an hour. I was thinking they were taking me to a nearby hospital but it turns out they were taking us back to the Huwwara checkpoint. We were taken out of the tank and were laid nude on the stretchers for almost one hour…”[xiii]

* Reuters reported: “Three Israeli soldiers forced a Palestinian man to strip naked at gunpoint and walk like a dog in a West Bank city under curfew…A Reuters photographer snapped Yasser Sharaf, 25, standing naked in a cold, muddy street in Nablus on Sunday as two men were handing him clothes to put on and two Israeli armoured vehicles were pulling away from the scene.”[xiv]

* Reporters who entered Nablus after the Israeli invasion of 2002 quoted from an interview with one of the inhabitants: “The men were then driven to a nearby yard, ordered to strip naked, and made to lie face down in the dirt. While my neighbor Jamal Sabar was taking off his pants, they shot him dead…”[xv]

* “A soldier inside the jeep ordered me to raise my hands and get out of the car and said, ‘take off your shirt.’ I did; then he said, ‘and the pants.’ I did; then he said, ‘the undershirt and underwear.’ I begged him not to force me; and he said, ‘I’ll shoot you.’ And all the soldiers pointed their guns at me. I took off my underclothes and stood naked in front of everybody. He ordered, ‘proceed with your hands up.’ I came up to him and he gave me a transparent plastic bag to cover myself. He blindfolded me and made me sit 20 meters away. Then the soldier shouted at a passenger called Islam 'Abed al-Sheikh Ibrahim, 18, who was sitting in the front seat, and ordered him to get out of the car. He told the soldier that his leg was broken, but the soldier insisted. He Islam got out and stood on his crutches. The soldier ordered him to take off his clothes. He tried by failed. The soldier came to me and removed the binding off my eyes and told me at gunpoint to go and help him take off his clothes. I went and helped the passenger take off all his clothes. The soldier told me to help him walk to the soldier. We walked up and he gave me another nylon bag for Islam. Then, he told us to sit on the ground. Soon after, the soldier ordered another passenger, Yasser Rasheed al-Sheikh Ibrahim,60, to get out of the car and take off his clothes like us…”[xvi]

* The Guardian described an incident in which a commander was “awaiting a court martial on several charges, including ordering the boy to strip naked, holding a burning paper under his testicles, threatening to ram a bottle into his anus and threatening to shoot him…”[xvii]

* “We were mostly older people, sick and wounded. We had nine handicapped people with us, three were from the same family, sons of Abu Ibrahim. Some of us were too old, they were senile. When they told them ‘go left’ they would go right, but they stripped them naked anyway. I tried to help them as much as I could. I was the only one who spoke Hebrew…Close to us was a group of young men. They were handcuffed, naked and lying on their stomachs. The Israeli tanks would pass by them so fast, only forty centimeters away from their heads."[xviii]

* “Other residents described how young men were stripped naked and then shot. Yusuf Shalabi, a young man from the camp explained how the Israeli soldiers denied medical treatment to the wounded, ‘…I remember this nightmare very well. It is very difficult to talk about it. I remember them stripping the people naked, they would handcuff them and blindfold them. I remember seeing two wounded men, one was wounded in the shoulder and the other in the leg. They were screaming in pain and the soldiers would not allow them to be treated.’”[xix]

“Incredibly, AP seems to have missed all of these, and more. As a result, Americans have little idea of the life is like for Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza.

“Moreover, strip searches are just the tip of the iceberg. According to an Israeli government report released in 2000 (five years after it had been written) Shin Bet “used systematic torture against Palestinians and regularly lied about it.”[xx] <#_edn20> An Israeli human rights organization estimated that 85 percent of Palestinian detainees had been subjected to torture. [xxi] In 2002 Foreign Service Journal carried a major expose on Israel torturing American citizens.[xxii] AP managed to miss this Foreign Service Journal expose – as did, therefore, every newspaper in the country.

The article concludes:

“AP is a cooperative, which means that every single newspaper, radio station, and television station that uses AP news is an owner of AP and, therefore, ultimately responsible for its reporting. This includes Democracy Now, which, apart from a report on Mohammed Omer, also seems to have covered Israel’s longstanding and pervasive pattern of degrading strip searches minimally, if at all.

“It is time for all these news media, and for their readers, listeners, and viewers, to demand that AP provide the full story. Americans have long given Israel, the size of New Jersey, far more of our tax money than to any other nation on earth. It is time to end the cover up on systemic Israeli practices of humiliation. Americans need to know how Israel is using our money.”
[i] “British consul strip searched at Israeli PM's office,” Rory, The Guardian, March 28, 2007

[ii] “Senior British Diplomat Strip-Searched at PM’s Office,” Itamar Eichner, Israel News, March 27, 2007.

[iii] “Humiliation and Child Abuse at Israeli Checkpoints: Strip-Searching Children,” Alison Weir, CounterPunch, March 15, 2007; Video interview: The Easiest Targets:http://www.ifamericansknew.org/about_us/easiesttargets.html

[iv] “Israelis arrest 16 from US in roundup of Christians,” Charles M. Sennott, The Boston Globe, October 26, 1999, Pg. A2

[v] http://peoplesgeography.com/2006/09/01/israeli-security-forces-kidnap-argentine-journalist/

[vi] http://www.fpa.org.il/?categoryId=422

[vii] “Humiliation and Child Abuse at Israeli Checkpoints: Strip-Searching Children,” Alison Weir, CounterPunch, March 15, 2007; Video interview: The Easiest Targets:http://www.ifamericansknew.org/about_us/easiesttargets.html

[viii] http://www.law.utah.edu/blogs/show-entry.asp?EntryID=252

[ix] http://www.maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&ID=23480

[x] “ALLENBY BRIDGE JOURNAL; A 15-Yard Span Over a Great Divide,” Thomas L. Friedman, New York Times, July 18, 1987

[xi] http://www.law.utah.edu/blogs/show-entry.asp?EntryID=252

[xii] “Israel’s Palestinian Prisoners: The Forgotten Facts,” Isabelle Humphries, Researcher – Nazarethhttp://www.islamonline.net/english/Muslim_Affairs/Asia/PoliticsEconomy/2006/07/01.shtml

[xiii] “Israel’s Implementation of the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT), May, 2005, Al-Haq: Law in the Service of Man, the Palestinian Centre for Human rights (PCHR), and the Women’s Centre for Legal Aid and Counselling (WCLAC)

http://www.pchrgaza.org/special/OPT%20CEDAW%20Main%20Review.pdf

[xiv] “Israelis Make Palestinian Strip Naked,” Reuters, Nov. 25, 2002

[xv] “Jenin: Lying Down On Broken Glass, Crushing Bones,” April 16, 2002 (IslamOnline & News Agencies)http://www.islamonline.net/english/News/2002-04/16/article40.shtml

[xvi] “Weekly Report on Israeli Human Rights Violations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory,” 01 - 07 September 2005, http://www.pchrgaza.org/files/W_report/English/2005/08-09-2005.htm

[xvii] “Commander charged with torturing Palestinian boy,” Chris McGreal, The Guardian, October 22, 2002

[xviii] “Stripping Palestinians has Become Common Practice: Eyewitness Accounts,” Suzanne Russ, Palestine Chronicle, November 26, 2002, http://www.ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/strippingcommon.html

[xix] “Stripping Palestinians has Become Common Practice: Eyewitness Accounts,” By Suzanne Russ, Palestine Chronicle, November 26, 2002, http://www.ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/strippingcommon.html

[xx] “Report: Palestinian suspects mistreated by Israeli captors,” Joel Greenberg, Chicago Tribune, May 6, 2007

[xxi] “Report: Palestinian suspects mistreated by Israeli captors,” Joel Greenberg, Chicago Tribune, May 6, 2007

[xxii] “Arab-Americans in Israel: What ‘Special Relationship’?” Jerri Bird, Foreign Service Journal, June, 2002
Share:

Um Amer

The following moving article will appear in the upcoming issue of Al-Awda's
newsletter Until Return. It was written by Khairya Zubaidi of Al-Hawiya,
Yarmouk camp, Syria, and translated by Sama Abdulhalim in San Diego
California.

The article is about Um Amer (mother of Amer) who passed away on July 2 from
complications from cancer. Um Amer, may she rest in peace, was one of 750
Palestinians stranded in al-Tanaf refugee detention camp located in no man's
land in the desert between Iraq and Syria. Um Amer appeared in the
documentary "25 Thousand Tents . . . Maybe More" demanding her right and
hoping to return to her village near Haifa. The documentary was screened
recently at the Sixth Annual International Al-Awda Convention. Copies of
this documentary will soon be available via Al-Awda's Media Center.

Palestinian refugees in Yarmouk camp including Khairya Zubaidi of Al-Hawiya
have been assisting our people at Al-Tanaf over the last two years with
whatever they can. Through these efforts they have developed personal
relationships and knowledge of the people
tranded at Al-Tanaf.by Khairya Zubaidi

Her passing was as difficult as her eventful and harsh childhood.
As a child, she began to awaken and discover the beauty of the world and to make
connections with the land and trees, home and hearth, and bread kiln in her
home. She had an invisible connection with everything she saw and all
things surrounding her; who said that the land and trees are not sentient
beings and that the air travels and is not connected to a specific land?
She was connected to all these things and the occupation of 1948 severed
this connection and cruelly uprooted her. She rushed off with her family
without even taking the necessities. She took refuge in the mountains by
using the land as her bedroll and the sky as her blanket. She drank the
rainwater and foraged the land. She found herself traveling through many
different lands ... traveling still after 60 years. Even 60 years didn't
diminish her love and desire to reclaim her roots. Longing for her
childhood home still burns in her heart. I asked her about her desire to
return home and her face lit up with a hope that she refused to lose, and
she answered "I will go back." She said "I wish this will come true. I
want to go back even if I have to go back to foraging the land and drinking
rainwater. Just return me to my land. I wish this would come true. Will
it come true before I leave this earth?"

Um Amer's dream did not come true. Illness got the best of her. Illness
was the only reason she was allowed to leave Al-Tanaf refugee camp - to
receive medical treatment. Test results showed that her illness was in an
advanced stage and hope for a cure was slim. Um Amer did not know how
severe her situation was. She had hoped she would get better and be able to
stand on her own two feet. Being in a public hospital that treats refugees
made it easier for her to deal with her situation for her fellow refugees
would visit with her. As a result of the illness, Um Amer was moved to
another hospital that specializes in cancer treatment.

Um Amer moved from the confinement of Al-Tanaf refugee camp to a
harsher and cruel confinement - death. She is confined by death. The dire
situation of the other patients surrounding her forced her to acknowledge
and wait for death. When she first found out she had cancer, she tried to
go back to the refugee camp. She felt it would be easier to be surrounded
by family and friends. All parties responsible, from the hospital to the
team responsible for Al-Tanaf, used her illness as an excuse to refuse her
request to return to the refugee camp. That is when Um Amer gave up and not
only did she refuse the cancer treatment but also treatment of any kind.
Her refusal to fight the cancer and seeing her forcefully subdued with
painkillers caused me great sorrow and sadness. I hoped she would keep
resisting and fighting the people in control because I felt that as long as
she was trying to get back to Al-Tanaf she would be fighting death as well.

I spoke with her about life and told her that she would get well and go back
to Al-Tanaf. I told her that she had to fulfill her promise to me to cook
biryani. I told her that she was stronger than Zahra, another Al-Tanaf
refugee who was currently fighting and winning the battle against a cancer
of the blood. After our conversation, Um Amer decided to resume the cancer
treatment. But it was already too late.

At one point, I spoke with Um Amer's doctor about her situation. He told me
that Um Amer was negligent in her treatment of herself. He said that she
should have gone to the hospital before the situation had gotten this bad.
I felt that his words were part of a dark comedy. All I could think to
myself was "doesn't this man know how often sick people try to go to the
hospital or see a doctor and are refused exit from the refugee camp until
they are at the point of death?" To all parties responsible for the refugee
camp, the people living there are just numbers not human beings. They don't
have names or feelings or needs, they are just a serial number. A year ago
things were even more difficult for people who were sick. Back then,
someone who was ill could not even be accompanied by a family member. They
had to leave the refugee camp and go to the hospital alone. Now they are
allowed one person to accompany them.

Um Amer's son, Amer, had a very difficult time getting permission to leave
Al-Tanaf refugee camp to visit his mother. After he finally received
permission to leave the camp and visit her at the hospital, he was only
allowed to stay with her a week. Um Amer was not expected to live long, she
was given hours at worst and a couple of days at most. The people
responsible for Al-Tanaf tried to make Amer go back to Al-Tanaf before Um
Amer passed away. Amer was in a difficult situation because his father was
also ill back at the Al-Tanaf camp. He wanted to stay with his mother but
he wanted to go back and take care of his father. In the end, logistics
forced his hand. There was no transportation available for him to go back
to Al-Tanaf. So he ended up staying with his mother until she passed away.

Um Amer's life was a chain of hardships. At age seven she was a suffering
immigrant, then sanctions and war for 10 years, then another unbalanced war,
then civil war which is, maybe, even more cruel created by countries who
claim they are democratic. She was forced to leave Baghdad to save her
children. The family was separated. One of her daughters left with her
husband. Her son, Omar, immigrated to Chile. The family was separated but
they are not the only ones. A similar story exists in every tent in the
camp and some stories are even worse. The hardships brought the refugee
community together. Their only crime is being Palestinians even though they
weren't involved in the Palestinian cause. All of this didn't convince the
executioner - if your Palestinian you're a fugitive not deserving of mercy.
This is the logic of current civilization. She left this life alone. Her
daughter, Nida, was her companion in suffering through the night. It was
very difficult for Nida to see the suffering her mother went through and her
certain death.

I will never forget you Um Amer . . . .how can I visit the camp without
seeing you? Without your exuberant welcome. I will miss hearing the
strength and pride you display when you speak. Your hardships didn't make
you weak and didn't cause you to beg for mercy or feel self-pity. I will
never forget your tears the last time I saw you. After I saw the movie, I
felt you were the hero of the film. You watched the movie in silence and
your tears ran down your wrinkled cheeks. You didn't speak but the
expression on your face said it all. While saying goodbye to you I wondered
if I would ever see you again. And it turned out to be the last time I saw
you.
Share:

Palestinian Arab workers rights in Israel

(The following is an extract from an article in Sawt el-Amel/The Laborer’s Voice, an independent grassroots organization founded by Palestinian Arab workers in Nazareth in 2000 to defend and promote the rights of Arab citizens in Israel.) The need to establish a trade union association for Palestinian Arab workers who hold Israeli citizenship did not arise out of a vacuum, nor was it born of coincidence; rather, it is urgently required to fulfill the ambitions of those Palestinian workers who remained on their lands after the Nakba of 1948.

It is also a direct result of the historical events the Palestinian people experienced after the Nakba and the subsequent collapse of the Palestinian trade union movement, whose activities were centered in the city of Haifa. The Palestinian working class in Israel is among the poorest sections of society and the one whose rights are most abused by employers. It should be emphasised that this group of workers is part of the Arab Palestinian minority holding Israeli citizenship, which has been faced with racial discrimination for sixty years, as manifested in land confiscations, home demolitions and the denial of work opportunities.

Their land was confiscated, their jobs lost, and - after Israel brought in hundreds of thousands of foreign workers as cheap labor in the building, agricultural and service sectors to replace Arab workers – their economic survival depended on social security benefits from the Israeli National Insurance Institute.

To read the full article in pdf format click HERE.

Share:

the only state in the world that officially commits these crimes

PCHR Publishes a Report on Extra-judicial Execution of Palestinians

PCHR published a new report titled, “Extra-judicial executions … Official, Declared Israeli Policy” covering Israeli extra-judicial executions against Palestinians during the period from 1 August 2006 till 30 June 2008. The report is the ninth of its kind in a special series on extra-judicial executions by Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) against Palestinian activists during Al-Aqsa Intifada.

The first part of the report discussed international standards prohibiting extra-judicial executions. These included the Fourth Geneva Convention (1949) and additional protocols and the Rome Statute. The second part discussed the official Israeli position vis-à-vis extra-judicial executions. Israeli legislative, executive, and judicial authorities officially support this policy, making Israeli the only state in the world that officially commits these crimes.

The third part of the report included statistics of extra-judicial executions during the reporting period. These statistics showedthat IOF committed 96 extra-judicial executions against Palestinian activists from all political parties in the Gaza Strip and West Bank . Israel accused them of involvement or planning operations against Israeli targets in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) or Israel . The total number of victims in these 96 crimes was 173 Palestinians: 150 were intended targets and 23 were civilian bystanders. The civilian victims included 3 women and 3 children. In the Gaza Strip, IOF committed 63 extra-judicial executions that killed 119 Palestinians (103 targeted and 17 bystanders); while in the West Bank IOF committed 33 extra-judicial executions that killed 54 Palestinians (50 targeted and 4 bystanders).

The report cited that since the beginning of Al-Aqsa Intifada, Israel committed 348 extra-judicial executions. These crimes killed 754 Palestinians, constituting 20% of the total number of Palestinians killed during the Intifada. These victims included 521 intended targets and 233 civilian bystanders. Among the civilian were 71 children and 20 women. The West Bank victims were 350 that included 274 targeted persons and 76 bystanders; and in the Gaza Strip, the victims were 405 that included 157 bystanders and 248 targets.

The fourth section of the report discussed the tools utilized by Israel to commit extra-judicial executions. The most notable tools are targeting by military aircraft, operations by under-cover units, ambushes, and house sieges.

The fifth section included stark examples of IOF extra-judicial executions during the reporting period. They included the extra-judicial execution targeting El-Hayya clan members in Gaza City on 20 May 2007 that resulted in the killing of 8 victims, 7 of them from the same family (including 2 children). A second example was the targeting of El-Yazji family members on 16 January 2008 that killed 3 persons: two brothers and a child.


The final section included recommendations to the international community and the High Contracting Parties of the 4th Geneva Convention. These recommendations called for immediate intervention to put an end to Israeli war crimes and human rights violations and to pressure Israel to respect the provisions of the 4th Geneva Convention (1949). There was also a call for intervention to end Israeli extra-judicial executions that is considered a form of summary execution without trial. The Centre also called for prosecuting the perpetrators of these crimes, and for the provision of international protection for the civilian population of the OPT as the only mean to prevent the recurrence of these crimes.


Note: The Arabic version of the report is currently available on PCHR's web site. An English version will be published after translation.
Share: