Showing posts with label Muslims. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Muslims. Show all posts

Gaza's Christians and Muslims grow closer in defiance of Israeli attacks

Solidarity between the Christian minority and Muslim majority is growing in Gaza as both suffer under the Israeli offensive, with churches sheltering all religions and prayers being offered up on all sides - 

Many tears were shed among the Christian minority at the service (AA)
A memorial service was held on Sunday for Ayyad at Porphyrius Greek Orthodox Church on Sunday. The church has become a haven not just for Christian but also hundreds of Muslim families seeking shelter there as the offensive drags on.
“The church has been our hosts for the past two weeks, offering food, clothes and whatever we needed, their loss is our loss, their pain is our pain,” says 45-year-old Abu Khaled.
At the memorial service for Jalila, Archbishop Alexios said: “Another human being, an innocent one, has lost her life." In the pews, crowds of Palestinian Christians sobbed as first from their tiny minority to be killed in the conflict was laid to rest.
In something that surprised local journalists, Jalila’s body was carried by both Muslims and Christians to the grave. It seems the shared wounds, mourning and rage are bridging past divides in war-ravaged Gaza.
Last week, Gaza’s Greek Orthodox Church also sustained damage by Israeli artillery shelling. Fifteen graves were damaged and damage was also caused to the Church’s sole hearse, says Kamel Ayyad, a parish member.
“The world must realise that Israel’s missiles don’t differentiate between Christians and Muslims,” said Abu.
At the memorial service a sad young man surrounded by attendees dressed in black gave a speech on behalf of the Greek Orthodox community and questioned the position of the international community in dealing with Israel’s crimes.
“Here is a Palestinian, an Arab, a Christian woman, martyred by Israeli shelling,” he said. “Bombs slammed into us and killed without differentiating between civilians and combatants,” he adds.
Christians and Muslims both helped to carry the coffin to the grave (AA)
Father Manuel Musallam, a former priest of the Latin Church, has always been an advocate for Palestinian unity.
“When they destroy your mosques, call your prayers from our churches”. 
There are approximately 1,500 Christians in Gaza. Mosques stand next to churches along the thin coastal enclave. George Ayyad, a relative of Jalila, rejects the idea that Christians will leave Gaza after this incident.
“This is exactly what the Israelis want, but where should we go?” he questions, before he continues “This is my homeland and we are Christians here in Gaza for more than 1,000 years and we will remain.”
During the memorial, bible scriptures were recited before Ayyad’s body was carried out and placed in a simple white coffin that had been decorated with a black cross.
Homeless Christians and Muslims brought out her remains together in the same community where Jalila will be buried, in the town she was born: in Gaza.
A Virgin Mary icon was placed in Jalila’s coffin while her relatives sang “Hallelujah.”

Share:

Muslims & Christian Leaders In Palestine are appealing to all world’s humane and considerate masses to rally in protest at Israeli terrorism

Sheikh Sabri, Archbishop Hanna launch distress signal over Gaza tragedy

OCCUPIED JERUSALEM, (PIC)-- Dr. Sheikh Ekrema Sabri, Chairman of the Supreme Islamic Council in Occupied Jerusalem, and Bishop Attalla Hanna, Greek Orthodox Archbishop of Sebastia, have called on the world’s Muslims and Christians to take serious action against Israeli ongoing offensives and genocides against Gaza civilians.
Sabri and Hanna called on the world’s free people to rally round Gazans and save them from the Israeli mass-carnages.
“On behalf of Jerusalemite Muslims and Christians, we are appealing to all world’s humane and considerate masses to rally in protest at Israeli terrorism and in solidarity with the blood-spattered Gaza.”
Share:

Pro-Israel/Religious Headcase predicts ‘Muslim Anti-Christ


ed note–let’s just put a few things into perspective here.


T

0


Truth




The ‘Babble’, and in particular the last book, Revelations, is what pro-Israel nutcases use in seducing feeble-minded Christians into supporting Israel and worshipping the Jews.
HOWEVER, this same ‘Babble’, and especially the book of Revelations, says ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about a future ‘Islamic’ anti-Christ. It never mentions a man named Mohammed or anything that can even be SLIGHTLY related to anything involving a group of people calling themselves Muslims who are enemies of Christ.
IT DOES HOWEVER HAVE A LOT TO SAY ABOUT JEWS AND JUDAISM, OVER AND FREAKING OVER AGAIN. It refers to the enemies of Jesus Christ as the ‘Synagoge of Satan’ several times. It describes Jews as ‘displeasing to God’ and ‘enemies to all mankind’.
And yet, according to Richardson, the wolf in sheep’s clothing described in this piece, we are supposed to put all those items aside and focus instead on the Muslims, who revere Jesus while Jews despise him?
And the sad thing is, Richardson will sell millions of copies of this book to these same feeble minded Christians who the same book of Revelations described as ‘worshippers of the beast’.
And I think we are all smart enough to figure out what that ‘beast’ is, and we’ll give ya a little hint here–it isn’t Islamic. 
Religious News Service
Every age needs an Antichrist.
Protestant Reformers picked the papacy as their embodiment of evil. American colonists chose King George III and some Cold War Christians suspected the Soviet Union was satanically led.
Now, amid threats of Islamic terrorism, a nuclear-armed Iran and tumult across the Middle East, a growing group of American evangelicals say the Antichrist will be Muslim.
“I understand that I’m going to be viewed as a fringe, apocalyptic Christian,” said Joel Richardson, author of several books predicting an Islamic Antichrist. “But I fully own the idea that the Antichrist will be a Muslim and will come out of the Muslim world.”
These days, even the fringe has a faithful following. On websites, television programs, conferences and books, conservative Christians like Richardson warn that a Muslim Antichrist will lead army to arise and attack Israel, in fulfillment of the biblical prophets and the Book of Revelation.
From there, they say, it’s a short road to Armageddon.
“Today, we’re seeing the beginning signs of that exact prophecy coming to pass,” warns Richardson.
Scholars say the arrival of Islamic Antichrist prophecies was, well, predictable.
“I think the shift to Islam was just waiting to happen,” said Glenn Shuck, an assistant professor of religion at Williams College who has studied evangelicals’ views on the apocalypse.
A certain kind of Christian, sometimes dubbed “armchair apocalyptists” or “newspaper exegetes,” seems especially inclined to cast their foes as agents of the Archenemy. The Antichrist they identify, scholars say, often reflects the era’s deepest anxieties.
For many modern Christian apocalyptists, fears of big government are embodied in an Antichrist who will unite nation-states in a totalitarian One World Order.
Since 9/11, though, Islamist terrorism has ascended as a new threat, and lept from the front pages to apocalyptic thrillers like the “Left Behind” series and nonfiction books such as Richardson’s “Mideast Beast” and “Islamic Antichrist.”
Richardson, a 40-year-old decorative painter from Missouri who jokingly refers to his writings as “an expensive hobby,” presents his prophecies as straightforward interpretations of the Bible, including the Book of Revelation.
Revelation, which never actually uses the word “Antichrist,” is one of the first Christian texts to cast its rivals as Satan’s spawn. Many scholars say phrases like “the mark of the beast” and “666″ are coded references to the Emperor Nero, who persecuted Christians.
For many early Christians, however, the Antichrist was not a particular person. It was spiritual figure who lurked in the hearts of all believers, luring them toward sin and heresy, said Shuck.
By the 12th century, the Antichrist — often seen as a human inhabited by Satan — had become a tool for identifying an enemy, fomenting fear and assembling an army.
“The Antichrist moves a long way from Augustine’s view of something that we all face inside us,” Shuck said, “to being very much an external battle with concrete figures.”
Popes used the Antichrist to rally Crusaders. Reformers used the Antichrist to battle popes. Northerners saw the Antichrist in the slave-holding South, and Southerners saw the same specter in the abolitionists.
In the modern era, Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, U.S. presidents, former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, England’s Prince Charles, and even megachurch pastor Rick Warren have all made the Antichrist list.
Apocalyptic Christianity always needs an enemy, scholars say, and the Antichrist is nothing if not adaptable.
“The Antichrist idea is very responsive to changes in current events,” said Robert Fuller, a professor of religious studies at Bradley University in Peoria, Ill. “It’s a symbol for what is most unsettling or troubling.”
Antichrist prophecies raise fears by warning of an imminent battle between good and evil, Fuller said, and settle those fears by assuring Christians that the “good guys” will win in the end.
If bad theology, the Antichrist often makes for good reading, as attested by the more than 60 million copies of “Left Behind” books sold.
Prophecy may not be the best career option, however. Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University closed its Tim LaHaye School of Prophecy just one year after it opened in 2002.
“It never did attract hardly any students, so we shut it down,” said Ronald Godwin, Liberty’s provost. “The students were looking for a major that would land them a career.”
A press release for Richardson’s book “The Islamic Antichrist” begins by noting a threat on the author’s life, then asserts that “90 percent of the current world fighting involves Islamic terror movements.”
“Theories presented in’The Islamic Anti-Christ’ continue to grow in popularity as the world watches the injustices of Muslim law spread across the globe and infiltrate many sectors of U.S. society,” the release says.
Not all apocalyptic Christians agree with Richardson, however.
Richardson’s own press release asserts that Hal Lindsay, perhaps the most famous modern-day doomsayer, is one his staunchest critics.
Tim LaHaye, co-author of the bestselling series “Left Behind” and one of conservative Christianity’s most respected apocalyptists, doesn’t buy Richardson’s theories, either.
“His book is interesting and informative,” LaHaye said in a recent interview, “but his argument on the Antichrist is ridiculous.” LaHaye and his ilk say the Antichrist must come from Roman stock, and point to modern-day Romania as his likely birthplace.
Muslim leaders and progressive groups are even more critical of Richardson.
Eric Boehlert, a senior fellow at the group Media Matters, said Richardson popped onto his radar after a 2011 appearance on Glenn Beck’s now-defunct Fox News show.
“If Richardson was saying these things about Christianity or Judaism he wouldn’t be able to get a pamphlet published,” Boehlert said, “but unfortunately, there’s a market in right-wing America that’s decided Islam is pure evil.”
Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said calling Islam or any other religion evil often leads to violence. Earlier this month, for example, a Muslim family in Oklahoma reported that their home had been attacked by a sniper after an individual asked about their religion, according to CAIR.
“There’s a question we should ask of all hatemongers who attack Islam,” Hooper said. “What is your end game here?”
Share:

STOP SPYING ON MUSLIMS


In this Jewish season of renewal and rebirth, in which we celebrate the universal value of equality of human rights, the New York Jewish community supports the local American Muslim community effected directly by this surveillance program. Every one of us should stand in solidarity when it comes to protecting the civil liberties — regardless of faith, ethnicity or race.
*

Stop Spying on Muslims

Why the NYPD Needs Oversight


GETTY IMAGES

By Rachel Kahn-Troster and Marjorie Dove Kent

What would it look like to have your movements and your friendships tracked simply because of your religion or where you prayed? Syed Farhaj Hassan knows. He stopped attending his mosque in New Jersey after discovering that the New York City Police Department had it under surveillance. Hassan, a specialist in the Army Reserve, told The Associated Press that he worried about his name, or the name of one of his mosques, turning up in a police intelligence dossier and jeopardizing his military security clearance or job prospects. He is one of eight American Muslims who filed a federal lawsuit in early June against the NYPD to force the department to change its surveillance tactics, which are aimed at singling out our Muslim neighbors and colleagues.
As Jews, we are just emerging from the Yamim Noraim, the High Holy Days, when our lives metaphorically become an open book before God and our year of deeds good and bad are examined and explained. But this examination is between God and us, not God and the state. Imagine if we worried that by going to synagogue for Yom Kippur, we would end up in the NYPD’s ledger of right and wrong. Under this aura of suspicion, the significance of the holy days would be replaced by mistrust and fear.
This is what the New York Muslim community must face. As Jews and as New Yorkers, we’ve been angered over the past year to read about targeted surveillance of Muslims by the NYPD. Numerous reports have shown that the NYPD has spied on Muslim student organizations, taken down the license plate numbers of people attending services at mosques and showed the inflammatory film “The Third Jihad” to hundreds of police trainees — targeting the Muslim community as a whole rather than acting on specific intelligence about individuals.
One NYPD practice that hit particularly close to home was the surveillance on college campuses, including infiltrating a student whitewater-rafting trip. For those of us who thrived in Hillels during our student years, it is unthinkable that those communities would cease to be safe spaces.
Jews have a historic vulnerability to abuses of power, and we feel especially responsible to ensure civil liberty protections for all New Yorkers. We know that the Jewish communities of New York City, like all communities, want to be assured that we are being kept safe against those who would do us harm. Keeping us safe, however, means that law enforcement should target suspects based on actionable evidence, not on those suspects’ religion, place of birth, race or ethnicity.
Two New York City Council members have introduced a bill that will create an Inspector General for the NYPD, which would have independent, broad authority to conduct investigations of the police department. Law enforcement officers would be required to report problems to the Inspector General and would also be protected from retaliation.
Inspectors General are a standard feature of government agencies — including the CIA, the FBI, and the U.S. Department of Justice — and most New York City agencies. While there are agencies that investigate individual cases, no mechanism exists to provide for independent investigations of NYPD policies and procedures to ensure that they are operating effectively and consistently with the law.
We encourage the City Council to adopt the Inspector General bill and its four companion bills, which would create additional safeguards against inappropriate NYPD surveillance and stop-and-frisk abuses. This includes prohibiting profiling by the NYPD, protecting New Yorkers against unlawful searches, and requiring officers to identify and explain themselves to the public.
In this Jewish season of renewal and rebirth, in which we celebrate the universal value of equality of human rights, the New York Jewish community supports the local American Muslim community effected directly by this surveillance program. Every one of us should stand in solidarity when it comes to protecting the civil liberties — regardless of faith, ethnicity or race.
Marjorie Dove Kent is the executive director of Jews for Racial and Economic Justice. Rabbi Rachel Kahn-Troster is the director of North American programs for Rabbis for Human Rights — North America.
Share:

Mainstream Media Lapdogs Think Muslims Should be 'Grateful' to U.S.

One prominent strain shaping American reaction to the protests in the Muslim world is bafflement, and even anger, that those Muslims are not more grateful to the US. After all, goes this thinking, the US bestowed them with the gifts of freedom and democracy

© Khaled Desouki/AFP/Getty Images
An injured Egyptian protester looks on during clashes with riot police near the US embassy in Cairo.
 - the very rights they are now exercising - so how could they possibly be anything other than thankful? Under this worldview, it is especially confounding that the US, their savior and freedom-provider, would be the target of their rage. 

Glenn Greenwald
The Guardian UK 

On Wednesday, USA Today published an article with the headline "After attacks in Egypt and Libya, USA Today asks: Why?" The paper appeared to tell its readers that it was the US that freed the Egyptian people from tyranny:

"Attacks in Libya that left four US diplomats dead - including Ambassador Christopher Stevens - and a mob invasion of the US Embassy in Cairo, in which the US flag was torn to shreds, have left many to wonder: How can people the USA helped free from murderous dictators treat it in such a way?"
 

Did you know that the "USA helped free" Egyptians from their murderous dictator? On Thursday night, NBC News published a nine-minute report on Brian Williams' "Rock Center" program featuring its foreign correspondent, Richard Engel, reporting on the demonstrations in Cairo, which sounded exactly the same theme. Standing in front of protesting Egyptians in Tahrir Square, Engel informed viewers that this was all so very baffling because it was taking place "in Cairo, where the US turned its back on its old friend Hosni Mubarak", and then added:

"It is somewhat ironic with American diplomats inside the embassy who helped to give these demonstrators, these protesters, a voice, and allowed them to actually carry out these anti-American clashes that we're seeing right now."
That it was the US who freed Egyptians and "allowed them" the right to protest would undoubtedly come as a great surprise to many Egyptians. That is the case even beyond the decades of arming, funding and general support from the US for their hated dictator (to his credit, Engel including a snippet of an interview with Tariq Ramadan pointing out that the US long supported the region's dictators). 

Beyond the long-term US support for Mubarak, Egyptians would likely find it difficult to reconcile Engel's claim that the US freed them with the "made in USA" logos on the tear gas cannisters used against them by Mubarak's security forces; or with Hillary Clinton's touching 2009 declaration that "I really consider President and Mrs Mubarak to be friends of my family"; or with Obama's support for Mubarak up until the very last minute when his downfall became inevitable; or with the fact that the Obama administration plan was to engineer the ascension of the loathed, US-loyal torturer Omar Suleiman as Mubarak's replacement in the name of "stability". 

Given the history of the US in Egypt, both long-term and very recent, it takes an extraordinary degree of self-delusion and propaganda to depict Egyptian anger toward the US as "ironic" on the ground that it was the US who freed them and "allowed" them the right to protest. But that is precisely the theme being propagated by most US media outlets. 

Even in Libya, where it's certainly true that many Libyans are happy about the Nato intervention, this bafflement is misplaced. It's always the case that some portion of the populace of an invaded nation will be happy about even the most unjustified invasions: that the Kurds are thrilled by the Iraq war is a fact still cited by Iraq war advocates as proof of the war's justness and wisdom. 

But it's also the case that such invasions produce extreme anger, as well: among the families of those killed by the invading forces, or who suffer from the resulting lawlessness and instability. Combine that with the fact that it was repeatedly noted that US involvement in Libya meant that anti-US extremists, including al-Qaida, were being armed and empowered by the US, it is far from mystifying, as Secretary Clinton insisted, that some people in Libya are deeply hostile to the US and want to do it harm. 

In the same report, Engel also spent several moments explaining that the primary reason these Muslims have such animosity toward the US is because their heads have been filled for years with crazy conspiracy theories about how the US and Israel are responsible for their woes. These conspiracies, he said, were fed to them by their dictators to distract attention from their own corruption. 

Let's leave aside the irony of the American media decrying crazy "conspiracy theories" in other countries, when it is the US that attacked another country based on nonexistent weapons and fabricated secret alliances with al-Qaida. One should acknowledge that there is some truth to Engel's claim that the region's tyrants fueled citizen rage toward the US and Israel as a means of distracting from their own failings and corruption. 

But to act as though Muslim anger toward the US and Israel is primarily the by-product of crazy conspiracy theories is itself a crazy conspiracy theory. It's in the world of reality, not conspiracy, where the US and Israel have continuously brought extreme amounts of violence to the Muslim world, routinely killing their innocent men, women and children. Listening to Engel, one would never know about tiny little matters like the bombing of Gaza and Lebanon, the almost five-decade long oppression of Palestinians, the widely hated, child-killing drone campaign, or the attack on Iraq. 

And it's in the world of reality, not conspiracy, where the US really has continuously interfered in their countries' governance by propping up and supporting their dictators. Intense Muslim animosity toward the US, including in Egypt, long pre-dates this film, and the reasons aren't hard to discern. That's precisely why the US supported tyranny in these countries for so long: to ensure that the citizens' views, so contrary to US policy, would be suppressed and rendered irrelevant. 

It doesn't take a propagandized populace to be angry at the US for such actions. It takes a propagandized populace to be shocked at that anger and to view it with bafflement and resentment on the ground that they should, instead, be grateful because we "freed" them. 

But to see why exactly such a propagandized populace exists in the US and has been led to believe such myth and conspiracies, simply read that USA Today article or watch the NBC News report on these protests as they convince Americans that gratitude, rather than resentment, should be the sentiment people in that region feel toward the US.
Share:

The West Seeks Destruction of Muslim Nations

Here is the link to my recent interview with Press TV on the conflict in Syria. The audio connection is not the best. It was our first time trying Skype. There is a written text version which contains a number of errors, no doubt, due to the poor quality of the audio. I would have preferred if the title said, "West seeks to weaken Arab and Muslim Nations" which is, I think a more  accurate title for the interview.    I have taken the liberty of editing the transcript to correct a few errors in transcription. 
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/256059.html 
Ed Corrigan


West seeks destruction of Muslim nations: Analyst
An interview with Edward Corrigan, human rights and international lawyer, from London, Ontario

US Republican Congressman Ron Paul has warned that his country is driving Syria into a war by interfering with the ongoing unrest in the Middle East nation.

“Last week the House passed yet another bill placing sanctions on Iran and Syria, bringing us closer to another war in the Middle East,” Paul wrote in an article on the Information Clearing House website.

“When will we learn our lesson and stop intervening in conflicts we don’t truly understand, conflicts that have nothing to do with American national interests?” Paul asked in his article.

Press TV has conducted an interview with Edward Corrigan, human rights and international lawyer, to further discuss the issue. The following is a rough transcription of the interview.

Press TV: First of all, the residents want to go back to their homes in areas that have been declared safe by the military and government in Syria, but they are being stopped by the insurgents: what do you make of this? What do they have in stopping civilians from returning to their homes?

Corrigan: The insurgency is trying to maintain the position that they have a lot of support with the population. They don’t really do not want the World to see refugees going back to areas that are now under the control of the Syrian government.

It undermines their political position and also what their propaganda is saying. The fact that citizens want to go back to areas that are under control of Bashar’s government, you know, directly contradicts their position that the majority or many Syrians are opposed to the government.

In fact, there is a lot of support for the Bashar regime. I think most of the Syrian population is opposed to the foreign backed parties that are trying to destroy Syria by provoking a civil war.

Press TV: There are some analysts that say that it is in the strategic interest of the West as well as its insurgents to continue a flow of refugees because is sort of gives an impression of a humanitarian disaster in Syria to the outside world and create a consensus for regime change and intervention. How do you interpret this?

Corrigan: I agree with you completely. There’s this whole new mechanism of humanitarian intervention, is really disguised for some other policies.

If there’s refugees or real alleged human rights violations then it does undermine the legitimacy of the regime and it provides the political support for other actions.

But this whole humanitarian intervention is really hypocritical. There’s no humanitarian intervention against Bahrain or Saudi Arabia which are suppressing demonstrators. There’s a massive movement of Salafis, and other al-Qaeda and Sunni extremists, which are brought in from Libya and elsewhere to try to bolster the opposition.

In fact, without that support and without the support of Washington’s powers, the fight would not even be occurring because the regime is very stable and has support of the Christian minorities, the Alawite…the Kurds and actually a large percentage of the Sunni population that appreciates the stability that the Baathist regime has brought to Syria.

Of course, they don’t want to see their country, their homes destroyed, their family members and relatives and other members of the community slaughtered in what is really a senseless war that accomplishes no purposes for the Arab population, the Muslim population, but supports interests of other parties.

Press TV: As this fighting continues in various parts of Syria and the government tries to rid the country from insurgents, the West and its allies are continuing to support them materially, that is. Is the West's desire to see Assad go worth the human cost that its coming at?

Corrigan: No. The West is really not concerned about the human cost. They want the Arab or Muslim states weakened, and if they can be destroyed, and if they can pit the various ethnic and religion communities against each other, they can just sit back and watch as Syria will be destroyed much like the way Iraq was.

Lebanon rebuilt itself and I think the Israelis and other people would like to see Lebanon fragmented into sectarian fighting that occurred from 1975 into the 90s. They accomplished that with Iraq, and now they’re trying to do the same into Syria. It was a lot of the opposition that was brought in from the Sunni community and other groups.

There’s actually a documentation that French troops have been captured in Syria, and a Turkish general was captured in Syria. There are reports saying that there are French and even NATO troops that are actively engaged in the sort of insurgency and attacks against the Syrian government.

Some of the stuff is clearly beyond the capability of regular rebels. Where are they getting tanks? Where are they getting surface-to-air missiles? This can only happen with the support of an organization like NATO, Turkey or Saudi Arabia and Qatar or other parties that are intervening.

This is not for a democracy of Syria. This is not to bring the end of the Bashar regime. This is to cripple Syria and to fragment it, and to prevent it from being part of a region with an element of stability.

Of course, Syria has been a strong supporter of Hezbollah and also supporter of Iran. They want to undermine this connection, and support of the interests of Israel, and more important the support of the West where they want control the oil and the resources, and fragment the area in order to make it easier to control, and pitting groups against each other -- an age old divide and conquer strategy that the British have perfected and certainly as old as the Roman Empire. 
Share:

Murder Of UK Muslims Goes Unpunished

Birmingham Crown Court has acquitted eight men who were allegedly involved in the killing of three British Muslims during the country’s unprecedented unrest last year.

Death of UK Muslims goes unpunished
Press TV – Haroon Jahan and brothers Shazad Ali and Abdul Musavir were killed during last year’s unrest after they were hit by a car in Winson Green, Birmingham, Britain’s second largest city.
The three Muslim men were protecting public property and local businesses against the looters when they were killed. Tariq Jahan, Haroon’s father, won national praise after he brought calm in the community and called for peace.
“The law and the justice system has let us down. Our community stood against looters but we are not being treated as equals. Our sense of disappointment over this verdict cannot be stated in words. We needed justice desperately and we were promised that but we cannot trust the criminal justice system anymore”, said Haroon’s father.
Hundreds of Muslims in Birmingham gathered outside a police headquarters and called for a review of the criminal trial that saw eight men acquitted of murdering the three Muslims.
“We’re not giving up this fight for the boys. I believe that we will get some sort of justice. We’re going to fight but we’re going to fight the legal way, I don’t want anybody to do anything silly or naïve”, added Haroon’s father.
Share:

No Love From Jewish girls desecrate Koran in Hebron


Ynet 24 July -- Two teenage girls caught on security cameras tearing Koran books inside the Cave of Patriarchs have yet to be questioned by police who have failed to track them down, four months after the incident.  The incident occurred four months ago when the Cave of Patriarchs was open to Jewish worshippers. The girls entered the cenotaph of Isaac, which is used for Muslim prayers, took two Koran books from a nearby stand and proceeded to tear the pages. Later on, they hurled the books, which are sacred to Islam, at the wall. Midway through the desecration, they were noticed by an Israel Border Guard officer who did not intervene. Another officer who was at the scene approached the girls and stalled them. And yet, since the event the girls have not been summoned by the police for further investigation..
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4259615,00.html
Share:

Happy Ramadan Kareem From Window Into Palestine



Ramadan kareem 2012

The Holy Month of Ramadan is upon us. So let us make use of this opportunity to wish all our readers a very happy Ramadan Kareem, filled with peace, love and serenity, on behalf of us all here at Window into Palestine:)).  This is a month filled with peace, and forgiveness. Muslims practice fasting in this holy month whereby they refrain from their desires such as eating and drinking all day long throughout the month, the purpose being to not only please God, but also to share the sufferings to the poor and the needy. Fasting is an important part of many religions, and not just Islam. Hence, we extend our greetings to ALL our readers, no matter what religion they follow. It is, after all, all about peace and love. We are very lucky, and proud to announce that this is 6 happy Ramadan message from Window into Palestine (6 successful years of bringing the insight on what's really happening in Palestine under Israeli Occupation) with you all!



"It feels great to greet muslims on this special occasion. Whether it may be any special occasion,  we were always fortunate to share these splendid moments with you all. Thank you for everything and for being a reader of postings and especially sharing the postings to bring traffic to this blog. 
Stay blessed and happy always. Happy Ramadan kareem 2012 :)"


Message from Mohammad:


What is the point of fasting?

Fasting is nothing new or exclusive. As we said, it is known to many religions. Indeed, the concept of fasting goes beyond any one religion. The sole purpose of the practice is to "hold fast" to your conscious, and never let it go. It isn't about keeping oneself hungry or thirsty. It is about learning to control one's desires and emotions, and to fight against such things that might lead a person astray.

It is about patience. Desire leads a man towards wrong, such as desire for money, desire for a better living, desire for more money, and so on. Often in the course of his life, a person following his desires neglects his social duties, and might even resort to vile or criminal behavior in order to see his desires fulfilled. Hence, Ramadan teaches a man to be patient, and to think through his better judgement rather than letting his desires to do the thinking for him.



Fasting also helps people realize the sufferings of the poor and the needy, who virtually are fasting every day of the year in all but name. Once when you put yourself in someone's shoes can you truly understand how they feel. Hence, the rich are more inclined towards helping the poor in this holy month, which is the whole point of humanity.

Hence, you see, fasting isn't about any one religion. It is about humanity. If there was no concept of fasting, people would never understand the problems of the poor, and would increasingly let their desires lead them,

Importance of Ramadan for Muslims

Ramadan, the ninth month of the Islamic or Lunar Calendar, holds much importance among Muslims, and other people in general. In this month, good deeds are rewarded manifold. And in the odd nights in the last ten days of the month, i.e. 21st, 23rd......29th, there comes a night of peace and blessings and forgiveness. This is the night when the Holy Book, The Holy Quran was revealed to mankind. If someone gets lucky, their sins are washed away and their conscious is reborn.


The onset of Ramadan is determined by the sighting of the moon

The onset of Ramadan is determined by the sighting of the moon. It is expected to be sighted today in our region (inshaAllah), while in the Arab region, it is the first day of this blessed, holy month. But moon or no, Ramadan is upon us. So once again, a very happy Ramadan Kareem to ALL our readers. May God bless us all and enable us to reach Ramadan and end it peacefully, while learning something in the process. May God be with us all! (Ameen) :)
Share:

The FBI’s ‘Islamic Terrorism’ Fraud


By Sherwood Ross | Aletho News 
Nearly every major post-9/11 terrorism-related prosecution has involved a sting operation at the center of which is a government informant, The Nation magazine reports.
The publication cites the findings of the Center on National Security at Fordham Law School. The Center has tracked 138 terrorism or national security prosecutions involving informants since 2001.
As the informants work for money or a reduction of their own criminal charges, their testimony may well be tainted. What’s particularly distressing, writes Petra Bartosiewicz, a New York City journalist in the July 2nd issue of the magazine, is that the FBI informants “have crossed the line from merely observing potential criminal behavior to encouraging and assisting people to participate in plots that are largely scripted by the FBI itself.”
The reporter explains that “Under the FBI’s guiding hand, the informants provide the weapons, suggest the targets and even initiate the inflammatory political rhetoric that later elevates the charges to the level of terrorism.”
One judge hearing a “terrorism” case, Colleen McMahon, of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, said it was “beyond question that the government created the crime here” and criticized the FBI for sending informants “trolling along the citizens of a troubled community, offering very poor people money if they will play some role—any role—in criminal activity.”
Adds Amna Akbar, a supervising attorney at CLEAR, the Creating Law Enforcement Accountability & Responsibility project of the City University of New York Law School: “The FBI approaches the vast majority of our clients as potential informants to partake in mass surveillance of Muslim communities, unconnected to any real criminal investigation.”
Within a year of the 9/11 attacks, Bartosiewicz writes, the FBI reassigned nearly half of its field office positions formerly devoted to the ‘War on Drugs’ to the new ‘War on Terror.” It also launched 3,000 new counterterrorism investigations. Today, of an $8.1 billion budget, the FBI allocates $4.9 billion to intelligence and counterterrorism, “approximately $1.7 billion more than all other federal crimes combined,” the journalist reports.
The author says the FBI is operating in a post-9/11 environment of relaxed guidelines that allow the FBI “to engage in lengthy and extensive surveillance of individuals and communities with little or no evidence of any wrongdoing afoot.”
If Americans are not shocked that real criminal prosecutions are being scrapped by FBI Director Robert Mueller in favor of “terrorism” probes which may be cooked up by the FBI to feed the nation’s Islamophobic paranoia, perhaps they should be.
A related article published in the same issue of the magazine quotes Andrew Shryock, a University of Michigan professor, having this to say about prosecutions using government informants: “It’s fabricated police work. And the disturbing thing is not that it produces arrests but that the public tolerates it.”
Sherwood Ross can be reached at sherwoodross10@gmail.com
Share:

The FBI’s controversial racist Muslim manual

http://freedetainees.org/12760

A discontinued FBI training manual about Islam and Arab culture is generating controversy online.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has obtained a 62-page PowerPoint training presentation used by the United States’ Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to teach new recruits ways to deal with “individuals from the M.E. [Middle East] during interviews and interrogations. The briefing provides facts about Muslims and their religion, many of which the ACLU claims are “biased and demeaning” and reveal an over-simplified understanding of Islamic and Arabic culture.

The ACLU notes that though the briefing encourages a respectful tone in places, it offers many ideas about Islam that are “inaccurate, biased, and unfair”. On a slide entitled “Language”, one bullet point reads: “It is the characteristic of the Arabic mind to be swayed more by words than ideas and more by ideas than facts.” On a slide entitled “Islam 101″, four bullet points are listed: “No separation between church and state. / Hard for Westerners to understand. / Transforms country’s culture into 7th century Arabian ways. / Regulates most aspects of life.” In the ACLU’s statement the organisation expresses concern that this represents an overreach in what the FBI should be looking at: “The briefing presents much information that has nothing to do with crime prevention and everything to do with constitutionally-protected religious practice and social behavior…”

Wired’s Danger Room blog reported on the presentation and received this statement from representatives at the FBI: “The FBI new agent population at Quantico is exposed to a diverse curriculum in many specific areas, including Islam and Muslim culture. The presentation in question was a rudimentary version used for a limited time that has since been replaced.” While the training document is no longer in use, the latest revision date listed on its first page is January 15, 2009.

These are some of the social media elements featured in this episode of The Stream.

  • Below are several pages from the FBI training manual obtained by the ACLU.

full piece > http://freedetainees.org/12760


The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!
Share:

Sabri issues edict prohibiting alternative homeland, exchange of lands



RAMALLAH, (PIC)-- Sheikh Ekrema Sabri, the Khatib (preacher) of the Aqsa Mosque has issued an edict prohibiting accepting an alternative homeland for Palestine and the exchange of lands.

Sheikh Sabri's edict published by Quds Press on Saturday said that a substitute homeland means surrendering the holy land of Palestine and the exchange of land is a kind of surrender, which is religiously forbidden especially regarding the land of Palestine, which is an Islamic Wakf land that could not be surrendered or bartered.

He further explained that countries could not be negotiated, exchanged or surrendered, adding that Palestine the land of Isra' is only for Muslims.

The Sheikh included verses of the holy Quran to confirm his edict, and concluded saying that no Muslim on the land of Palestine would ever accept an alternate homeland.

Share: