Showing posts with label Barack Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Barack Obama. Show all posts

Israel Blackmailing Obama! Expanded!


Furthermore, the Israelis and “the Lobby” are well aware they have Obama on the run. He has already caved in to most of their wish-list…but for their final “guaranteed us WAR” demand.


by Mark Bruzonsky


The Israelis pushed Jimmy Carter out of Washington, even secretly dealing with the hated Iranian Mullahs to do so, in order to bring in Ronald Reagan and the early Neocons.  Shortly thereafter, with Reagan’s blessings, they invaded Lebanon leading to a long disastrous occupation, the birth of Hezbollah and Hamas, the rise of suicide bombers, escalating anti-American on top of anti-Israeli passions throughout the region, and today’s entrenched Apartheid occupation.
1980: Ronald Reagan (R) defeats Jimmy Carter (D).
Then the Israelis helped instigate Contragate, rushed to greatly expand their settlements  (bringing on the Infifada uprisings which were to become a model for the Arab Spring), pushed our world to 9/11, quickly stimulated the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, and continually kept hyping the themes of “radical Islam” and “Clash of Civilizations”.
Now in 2012 an even bigger and far more dangerous Israeli scheme is underway.  The Israelis and their multiple Jewish Zionist operatives and organizations want to ignite the region into an unextinguishable multi-dimensional conflict to suit their expansionist and paranoid proclivities.
Now the current American President is being blackmailed.  If he doesn’t provide Israel still more super advanced armaments and still more vast quantities of monies, and if he doesn’t promise Israel that if reelected the US will attack Iran on Israel’s behalf, that they the Israelis will ignite the Middle East region on their own during the election campaign and maybe seal Obama’s fate.  As Carter before him the Israelis are in the process as making Barack Hussein Obama — another President who tried to champion an end to their settlement expansions and even a rump unreal quite-castrated “Palestinian State” — into a “failed” one-term President.
The threat goes that regardless of Obama’s opposition they can use the massive power of their Lobby and their tight grip on the American Congress and media to force the US to join in regardless of  US policies and national interests.
Multiple efforts — some sparked by, some coordinated with, the Israelis — are simultaneously underway undermining Obama’s prospects whatever he says and does.   His compliant Israeli-centric speech to the U.N. last September they want to be greatly amplified and made even more to their liking this year!
Netanyahu gets more standing ovations than Obama
Add to this their further blackmail threat to undermine and block even a second-term Obama using the Congress and the media is quite credible.  Remember those 29 standing ovations for Netanyahu before that rare Joint Session of Congress earlier this year?   Remember the power of AIPAC, and now CUFI, and the many other highly-partisan, well-funded and well-staffed organizatons that has been demonstrated so many times in the past?
Bottom Line: It’s an outrageous and quite convoluted Israeli blackmail scheme and they are getting away with it!
The Israelis are so use to successfully manipulating the US, as well as the EU, to get their way — year after year, crisis after crisis — that they are now pulling out all the stops, using all their tricks and operatives.  They are super-charged this go around and they still have political afterburners to kick in if and when needed.
Furthermore, the Israelis and “the Lobby” are well aware they have Obama on the run. He has already caved in to most of their wish-list…but for their final “guaranteed us WAR” demand.
But that one too they are expecting to achieve and they already have Congress and Obama on record pledging but not quite promising hot WAR with IRAN – an unprecedented cold and warming war is already underway.   The Israelis are continually manuevering unrelentingly in order that this war decision about when and how will be theirs — not one based on American national interests but rather on their own hard-line Zionist visions.
Keep up with what is going on today and everyday at WashReport.com and MiddleEast.Org.

Mark Bruzonsky holds dual advanced degrees in international affairs and law from Princeton University and New York University where he was a Root-Tilden Scholar.   He is a journalist and international affairs consultant and the publisher of MiddleEast.org as well as the now under development WashReport.  He writes and speaks frequently about world affairs, U.S. foreign policy, the Middle East, the underlying realities of policy-making in Washington, and U.S.-Israeli relations.  His now daily blog is headlined “Insightful, Irreverent, and Ferociously Truthful”. Bruzonsky was the producer and host of the weekly TV program Mid-East Realities from 1994 to 2004 when it was broadcast during primetime evening hours on all the cable TV systems in the Washington, DC area.  Many of these programs are now available online.
Share:

Obama promises to Israel they will be come first if he is re-elected

West Palm Beach - US President Barack Obama said on Thursday that his nation's staunch support for Israel was not up for partisan debate as he hit the campaign trail in swing state Florida.

Obama also reiterated his condemnation for what he called the "barbaric" bomb attack on a bus filled with Israeli tourists in Bulgaria that left six dead and which the Jewish state has blamed on Iran.

"I want everybody to know, under my administration, we haven't just preserved the unbreakable bond with Israel, we have strengthened it," Obama told a mainly elderly audience at a campaign event in West Palm Beach.

"We stood by Israel's side in the face of criticism. Our military and intelligence co-operation have never been closer," he said, pointing out it was a "great moment of uncertainty in the Middle East".

"Now's the time to make sure that we're doing everything we can to protect Israel's security, and I want you to know that that's something that should transcend party. That's not a Republican or Democratic issue."

Florida, a key battleground state in the race for the White House, has many Jewish voters. A study conducted by the University of Connecticut last year said the state was home to 10% of the Jewish American population.

Obama's Republican rival Mitt Romney said at a January debate of his party's presidential contenders that the Democratic incumbent "threw Israel under the bus" in terms of his stance on Israeli-Palestinian peace talks.
Share:

theory on the OBL operation / video: The Men Behind Obama

     I speculate that Obama's recent assassinations (of OBL and Gadaffi's family)  is part of Operation Re-elect Obama.

1) Why does the oligarchy care whether they install Obama or 'the other guy'? I think Webster Tarpley sums it up perfectly Click on this link: (VIDEO: The men behind Obama): Obomba is the perfect mask  for US imperialism.

2) Why did they need to pull off these particular operations for the sell?
Well, who now is stickin around, supporting this pathological liar & assassin in the White House? Who on the left is naive enuf to still believe the hype from 2008? Who is immoral enuf - after ALL has been exposed - to fall for the democracker 'lesser of 2 evils' BS, again?
Gone, I suspect (would hope) are all the young folk who got snookered first time around; ditto a majority of blacks. Ditto independents and some disgusted democrats (who should have known better, btw; evidence on this guy was aplenty if one did even minimal research)

Here to stay are the die-hard democrackers - who would vote for Charles Manson is he were the D-candidate.
So who to pick up? The yahoos, the kick-ass bully-boys-and-girls that america breeds and panders to.  To the detriment of all of us, world-wide, who want a liveable planet with justice and liberty for all.

Apathy is killing us...


The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!
Share:

BREAKING NEWS: BARACK OBAMA IS DEAD

Hoax picture sourced from Google images - picture is in the same style as the hoax picture of a dead Osama bin Laden published on the Daily Mail Hoax picture sourced from Google images - picture is in the same style as the hoax picture of a dead Osama bin Laden published on the Daily Mail
American War Criminal Barack Obama has been killed by Pakistani security forces in the UK, Prime Minister Hasan Abdullah of Pakistan has said.
15 May 2021
BREAKING NEWS: BARACK OBAMA IS DEAD
American War Criminal Barack Obama has been killed by Pakistani security forces in the UK, Prime Minister Hasan Abdullah of Pakistan has said.
Obama was shot dead at a compound near Camberley, in a ground operation based on Pakistani intelligence, the first lead for which emerged last August.
Mr Abdullah said Pakistan forces took possession of the body after "a firefight".
Obama is believed to have ordered almost 200 attacks in North and South Waziristan between 2009 and 2011 in which almost 2000 people were killed, when he served as Commander in Chief of the US Armed Forces. Obama is also believed to have ordered the continued bombardment of Afghanistan during the same period in which thousands of others were killed.
He was top of Pakistan’s "most wanted" list.
DNA tests later confirmed that Obama was dead, Pakistani officials said.
Obama was cremated at the stake after a Christian funeral on board an aircraft carrier, ISI officials said.
Announcing the success of the operation, Mr Abdulla said it was "the most significant achievement to date in our nation's effort to defeat the CIA".
Pakistan has put Muslims around the world on alert, warning them of the possibility of American reprisal attacks for Obama’s killing.
ISI director Mohammed Akram said America would "almost certainly" try to avenge the death of Obama.
Crowds gathered outside the Red Mosque in Islamabad, chanting "Allah Akbar" after the news broke.
Foreign Minister of Pakistan, Mullah Jundullah said the operation sent a signal to the Neoconservatives in both the US and Britain.
"You cannot wait us out, you cannot defeat us, but you can make the choice to abandon the CIA and participate in a peaceful political process," she said.
Compound raided
Obama, 60, approved the campaign of terror on Waziristan for almost three years in which nearly 2,000 people were killed.
He evaded the forces of Pakistan and its allies for almost a decade, despite a $50m (£30m) bounty on his head.
Mr Abdullah said he had been briefed last August on a possible lead to Obama’s whereabouts. He authorised the operation last week once he determined there was enough intelligence to take action.
"It was far from certain, and it took many months to run this thread to ground," Mr Abdullah said.
On Sunday, Pakistani forces said to be from the elite Badr Brigade undertook the operation in Camberley, Surrey, 50km (30 miles) south-west of London.
Pakistani officials said Obama was shot in the head after resisting.
Mr Abdullah said "no Muslims were harmed".
Pakistani media reports said that the body was cremated at the stake to conform with Christian practice of a dignified burial and to prevent any grave becoming a shrine.
Giving more details of the raid, one senior Pakistani official said a small Pakistani team conducted the attack in about 40 minutes.
Three other men - one of Obama’s brothers and two couriers - were killed in the raid, the official said, adding that Obama’s wife Michelle was also killed when she was used as "a shield" and two other women were injured.
One helicopter was lost due to "technical failure". The team destroyed it and left in its other aircraft.
One resident, David Shields, told Reuters the helicopters had come under "intense firing" from the ground.
The size and complexity of the structure in Camberley "shocked" Pakistani officials.
It was surrounded by 4m-6m (12ft-18ft) walls, was eight times larger than other homes in the area and was valued at "a million dollars", though it had no telephone or internet connection.
The Pakistani official said that intelligence had been tracking a "trusted courier" of Obama for many years. The courier's identity was discovered four years ago, his area of operation two years ago and then, last August, his residence in Camberley was found, triggering the start of the mission.
Another senior Pakistani official said that no intelligence had been shared with any country, including the UK, ahead of the raid.
"Only a very small group of people inside our own government knew of this operation in advance," the official said.
The Camberley residence is just a few hundred metres from Sandhurst – the British equivalent of the Pakistani Military Academy.
The BBC's Alan Matthews in Camberley says it will undoubtedly be a huge embarrassment to the UK that Obama was found not only in the country, but also on the doorstep of the military academy.
He says residents in the town were stunned the former American leader had been living in their midst.
The senior Pakistani official said the "the loss of Obama puts the Neocons on a path of decline that will be difficult to reverse".
Obama’s probable successor, Tony Blair, was "far less charismatic and not as well respected within the organisation", according to reports from captured Neoconservative operatives, the official said.
However, the root causes of Neoconservatism - the range of issues that enabled the Neocons to recruit disaffected young liberals to its cause – hatred of Islam, oil and power - remain, for the most part, unaddressed, Neoconservative affairs analyst Rajinder Harbin told the BBC.
"The death of Obama will strike at the morale of the global ‘war on terror’, but is unlikely to end it," he warned.
'Momentous achievement'
World leaders welcomed the news of Obama’s death.
French President Jean Luc Blanc said Obama had "paid for his actions".
British Prime Minister Ed Milliband said the killing was a "great victory" but added that he "didn't know the details" of the Pakistani operation.
Former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Salim described the news as a "momentous achievement".
"The fight against terror goes on, but tonight Pakistan has sent an unmistakable message: No matter how long it takes, justice will be done," Mr Salim said in a statement.
But a spokesman for the English Defence League threatened revenge attacks against the "Muslamic and British governments and their security forces".
In the Israeli enclave of Tel Aviv, which is governed by militant group IDF, Prime Minister Ariel Lieberman condemned the killing of "a peaceful man".
BBC security correspondent Faraz Javed says that, to many in the Muslim world, Obama became the embodiment of global terrorism, but to others he was a hero, a devout Christian who fought three wars in the name of democracy.
 
All events are purely fictional – but you knew that already, didn’t you?
 
Click here to read Cageprisoners' afterword on this piece.


Written by Fahad Ansari
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!
Share:

Will Mr. Obama adhere to the values and morals of democracy, justice and peace that he calls for, or will he cave in once again to his Zionist Masters

Israeli lopsided logic

Samia Khoury

We are damned if we do, we are damned if we don’t.  One more time the Israeli lopsided logic prevails.  The first official reaction of Israel to the Palestinian reconciliation was that it will be an obstacle to peace.  Ironic as it may sound, it was only a short while ago that Israel used the Fateh-Hamas in-fighting as a justification for not moving ahead with the peace process.  Despite all the settlement building and the continuous onslaught on Jerusalem,  Israel insists on giving the impression that it is  actually  offering us peace on a silver platter, and it is we, the Palestinians,  who have fouled it all up. 

Unlike last week,  when the press of the whole world was busy with the Royal wedding, and I must admit it was a nice break for all of us to relax on that Friday morning watching a real fairy tale.   The young couple,  William and Kate were really lucky to be in the limelight for the whole week end.  Nobody would have bothered about a royal wedding when the Breaking News flashed “Bin Laden is Dead”.  Ten years after the 9/11 Mr. Obama succeeded in achieving what his predecessor had failed to achieve.  And it seemed to me that Mr. Obama has certainly   guaranteed a good start for his election campaign, especially when his popularity had been losing ground lately. 

Ever since I heard Mr. Obama’s  inaugural speech in 2009  in which he stressed the importance of justice more than once, I have been  hoping that the resolve for bringing about justice to our Palestinian people,  whose cause has lingered not only for one decade but for  more than five decades, will bear fruit.  But what happened was  contrary to our expectation; it was the USA administration that has been blocking any chances for that justice to prevail even when it was glaringly clear that Israel has been the perpetrator of this grave injustice inflicted on the Palestinians ever since 1948.

For us in the occupied territories the best breaking news was the reconciliation between Fateh and Hamas.  A long awaited demand of the Palestinian people so that we can have a united front to deal with all the  challenges of the Israeli  military occupation.  We have already made enough concessions since the signing of the  Oslo accords in 1993, and settled for relative justice  by accepting the establishment of a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders (22% of historic Palestine.)      It is so illogical to demand of Hamas to recognize the state of Israel, when  Hamas itself  is not a state, but a faction in an occupied territory  that has not even been recognized yet as a state.  However,  Hamas was very clear in its announcement during the ceremony of  the signing of the reconciliation agreement, that it will agree to the  establishment of  the Palestinian state within the 1967 borders.    

Mr. Netanyahu is already touring Europe and the USA to foul any plans for the establishment of a Palestinian State.  Will Mr. Obama adhere to the values and morals of  democracy, justice and peace that he  calls for,  or will he cave in once again, and have his  election campaign justify his silence regarding another round of injustice? 
Dare we hope for another breaking news announcing the establishment of a Palestinian State in September?

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!
Share:

President Obama, "Get Real" on 9/11 and Phony Terror



"YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"
“WE CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH, SOME OF US ANYWAY”

By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor
America is in its 10th year of war in Afghanistan and losing.  Everyone there hates us, we haven’t won a single “heart” or “mind.”  We have succeeded in building an empire of opium and heroin on a scale never before imagined.
Millions at home, tens of millions in Russia, Europe and around the world have been destroyed by the flood of narcotics distributed with deadly efficiency by a combination of rogue military and intelligence operations and the contracting firms we payed to protect us.
American corruption, incompetence and brutality has recruited hundreds of thousands into a war against the United States who could otherwise have been our allies.  This is the simple truth of it.
The entire premise for Afghanistan was a lie.  Not long ago, Ron Paul exposed even the first Gulf War as a lie, Saddam’s invasion of Kuwait was authorized and supported by the United States.  This is one of the uncelebrated Wikileaks accomplishments.
Everybody knows, and I do so love saying this, that there were no WMDs in Iraq, that the whole thing was set up by Israel.  5000 Americans died uselessly.  Let’s face it, “uselessly” is the right term, no way about it.  We can handle the truth.
Handle this:

  • 9/11 was pure “false flag” staged by Israel with help from Pentagon, CIA and White House “friends”
  • There were NO 9/11 hijackers, no “box cutters,” no airplane drama, no passengers storming the cockpit, no phone calls, it was all made up
  • No plane hit the Pentagon, it was a missile [ ed. note: or just military grade explosives and movie theatric pyrotechnics]
  • Two airplanes didn’t knock down the 3 WTC towers.
  • Osama bin Laden worked for the CIA and died 10 years ago
  • Al Qaeda never existed until we invented it.  It still doesn’t, not really, though millions of Muslims now wish it did so they could join.
There is so much “hard proof” of these things, you could convict “OJ,” even with Alan Dershowitz defending him.
The “proof” of the cover story dissolved years ago, the phony investigation, the phony engineering study, all a sick joke, with the emphasis on “sick.”  Anyone who accepts this bilk is simply too stupid to live.
We are preparing to put a “hijacker” on trial soon.
First of all, it isn’t really a trial at all, its some sort of military kangaroo court thing, quite illegal, quite unconstitutional, no surprise there.
Hey, it gets even better.
We aren’t even sure who we have.  Not only did this guy have nothing to do with 9/11, according to intelligence sources, he probably is just so schmo we “bought” back during the Bush administration, some nameless victim like the dozens or even hundreds, perhaps thousands, we kidnapped, tortured (and executed) by “mistake.”
It was never a mistake.  It was a “ploy.”  Bush and Cheney needed “numbers” to sell the idea that they were winning the “GWOT.”  (Global War on Terror)  They gave these instructions:
  • Get us “warm bodies,” for “suspects,” we don’t care who or why, we need “results”
  • Get us “confessions,” the more outlandish, the better…
  • Go out and recruit “terrorists,” inside the US, Europe and around the world.  We want to be able to stage terror attacks on demand, based on election and news cycles or when we need a distraction
This is the truth.  This is what the facts support.  This is what we need to admit to and these are the crimes we need to redress, to our own people and people around the world.
We have become everything we ourselves fear most.  No more fairy tales, no more bedtime stories, no more lies.
Source: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/04/11/gordon-duff-president-obama-get-real-on-911-and-phony-terror/

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!
Share:

Is The Obama Claims just as phony as the Claims of Israel?

Obama admits not being born in Hawaii
He made this statement before he learned that he had to be a natural born citizen in this country to be a candidate for the presidency. We are not as crazy as the press would want us to be.


Obama admits not being born in Hawaii from Rebel News on Vimeo.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!
Share:

America's so called support of democratic change in the Middle east stops at "the gates of Palestine

The American Government cannot even give freedom and so called democracy to Americans never mind take time away from  thinking for themselves to care what is happening to people in the middle east...it's bullshit! The American Government high ranking officials like high ranking officials from any Government on the planet care only for themselves and what keeps them getting elected and keeping money flowing in their pockets.


If the American Government cared for even one percent of Democracy Hamas the freely elected Government for Palestine would not be where they are. The people of Gaza would not be living the way they are. There would not be that blasted Apartheid Wall and Israel would not not have their Government high jacked and under occupation.


Get off the fence Obama, you are not fooling any one with American policy. American has the longest history of supporting dictatorships that keep people in their place while American Government interest is met and the corporate whores of the planet fill their pockets along with the dictators while the majority of citizens are lucky to see just another day.


Why are Palestinians not worthy of this so called democracy you want people in Egypt to have Obama? That's the question? Why do you not support the rule of international law? In a so called democracy when there is a vote, it is common that, when there is a vote the position with the most votes win. This is never the case when it comes to Palestine is it Mr President? Or are you a dictator as well?


The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!
Share:

Obama plays the fox with the Israeli wolves

Lawrence Davidson argues that the apparent game plan behind US President Barack Obama’s extraordinary concessions to Israel in return for a temporary moratorium on colony expansion in the West Bank will most likely fail because it aims unscrupulously to ensnare the Palestinians into an agreement that rewards Israel but delivers zero justice and solves nothing for the Palestinians.
”So this is Obama’s problem, he is an articulate and clever man, but not a courageous one. Such men do not usually win against the wolves. They do not achieve real answers to our problems. They only produce feeble, short-lived consensus. That is a road that can only circle back upon itself.” (Lawrence Davidson)

The gamble

On 20 November a State Department spokesperson announced that the United States government is actively negotiating with Israel the price of a proposed 90-day cessation of settlement activity on the West Bank (excluding East Jerusalem).

It is reported that the Israelis are demanding two things be given them free of charge: 20 stealth fighters (worth 3 billion US dollars) and the release of the spy  Jonathan Pollard. On this latter demand it is to be noted that in a letter to President barrack Obama, 39 Democratic members of Congress asked that the president grant Pollard clemency. These are the things that Israel has asked for.

Then there are the things that the White House has offered voluntarily: among them is a promise to veto any Security Council resolutions hostile to Israel which is, after all, standard operating procedure for Washington and, more significantly, not to ask the Israelis for any further settlement freezes.

“Obama is obviously gambling that he can get Abbas back to the table without a freeze in East Jerusalem and that 90 days is enough time for the two parties to set down a preliminary border that would then smooth the way to a final settlement.”
The question that immediately comes to mind is, if the US has not been able to broker an Israeli-Palestinian peace in the past 43 years (counting from 1967), what does this president think he can get done in 90 days? A lot of observers think that his offer to Israel is just another craven act of submission by a weak president. But I am not so sure. So here is my take on the situation.
The official line set down by the Palestinian "leader", Mahmud Abbas, is that the Palestinian National Authority (PNA) will not renew negotiations with Israel until there is a halt to settlement construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Obama is obviously gambling that he can get Abbas back to the table without a freeze in East Jerusalem and that 90 days is enough time for the two parties to set down a preliminary border that would then smooth the way to a final settlement. How does he plan to do this?

Playing the fox

It is not to hard to see what is going on here. The president of the United States (playing Machiavelli’s fox) is setting out to ensnare the ersatz president of Palestine who, as usual, has been completely cut out of the present discussions between the US and Israel. As to the near future, here is scenario for which Obama may aim:
First: The price of this brief settlement moratorium will be finalized in a written document. The Israelis will probably get their stealth fighters but are unlikely to get Pollard. The aircraft are traditional, if expensive, giveaways. But giving up Pollard has always been adamantly opposed by the American intelligence services and no previous president has risked the serious demoralization of those agencies by doing so. Obama will probably not take that risk either, but then, I would be hesitant to bet on this.

Second: Netanyahu will get his security cabinet to approve the US incentive package by negotiating abstentions from those, such as the representatives of Shas, who do not want to vote for the deal.
“It is a lose-lose deal [for the Palestinians] and Abbas probably knows it. But he is not Yasser Arafat and, in the end, despite loud protests, he is unlikely to have the courage to just walk away.”
Third: The Americans will go to Abbas (who is already feeling the walls closing in on him) and demand that he come back to the table. Abbas is so dependent on Washington for everything from the salaries of his bureaucrats to the guns used by his militia that he would have to dig pretty deep into his soul to find any principle to stand on. Maybe he too will ask for an incentive package to ease the way around a principled stand, and perhaps he will be thrown some sort of bone.

Fourth: Having been dragged kicking and screaming (at least for public appearance sake) back to the table, Abbas and his negotiators will then be trapped. They will be officially tied to a 90-day clock. They will agree to a deal within that time period or, having seriously embarrassed president of the United States (who has pledged himself to seek no further delays in settlement activity), they will be abandoned, which has always been the threat from Washington. It is a lose-lose deal and Abbas probably knows it. But he is not Yasser Arafat and, in the end, despite loud protests, he is unlikely to have the courage to just walk away.

Legacies

In this scenario President Obama is motivated by an obsessive drive to be the man who settles the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Of course, if accomplished, it will be a very messy sort of settlement, considering that Hamas is out of the loop and Abbas really does not represent most of the Palestinians. Indeed, Abbas’s probable fate is not to die in bed. Nonetheless, the settlement, such as it is, will be Obama’s legacy and simultaneously it may allow him, as Juan Cole has suggested, to outmanoeuvre the unscrupulous Republican opposition in the House. Also, he certainly believes it will help him become a two-term president.
“If Obama can accomplish this … there will be an ‘official agreement’ under cover of which the United States and Europe … will declare the problem solved and treat in a ferocious manner any party, such as Hamas and Palestinian refugee groups, who say otherwise.”
If Obama can accomplish this (and many things can go wrong with this scenario) there will be an "official agreement" under cover of which the United States and Europe can abandon those Palestinians not confined to the Palestinian "state". They will declare the problem solved and treat in a ferocious manner any party, such as Hamas and Palestinian refugee groups, who say otherwise. Thus, the West Bank Palestinians will "officially" get bantustans which the West will call a state. And then a long war of attrition will be waged against the "terrorists" and "spoilers" who would upset the "peace" settlement. This too will be part of Obama’s legacy.

Who am I?

What are we to make of this possible strategy? Well, it is a testimony to where political "realism" can take you. And, that is most likely how President Obama sees himself, as a realist. The New York Times editorial writer  Paul Krugman has quoted Obama’s political adviser,  David Axelrod, as describing the president’s present state of mind: "We have to deal with the world as we find it." This, of course, is a mask behind which stands a president who has never really been a fighter. Rather, he has always been a "realist", following on the maxim that politics is the art of the possible. Obama seems not to realize that what is possible has something to do with where he decides to draw the line, lay down a principled stand beyond which he will not go. As Krugman observed, the president has always believed in the magical possibilities of consensus building. Alas, he does not seem to care very much with whom he builds consensus or what it gives us once arrived at.

So President Obama is not a visionary. That sort of rhetoric he leaves to his speech writers. He is a rather naive fox. He sets snares for others and perhaps he senses the snares laid out for him by his adversaries. However, he does not have the lion-like qualities that Machiavelli tells us a leader must have to fend off the wolves. Rather than fight wolves he prefers to bargain with them. The wolves in this case are the Israelis and those who now lead the Republican Party. So this is Obama’s problem, he is an articulate and clever man, but not a courageous one. Such men do not usually win against the wolves. They do not achieve real answers to our problems. They only produce feeble, short-lived consensus. That is a road that can only circle back upon itself.
Share:

Ex-AIPAC official threatens to uncover mass spying at Israel lobby

By Daniel Tencer

21-obama-aipac.jpg
RAW STORY,
Top AIPAC officials visited prostitutes, regularly watched porn at work: claim
Is US's most influential advocate for Israel about to implode?
A former foreign policy chief for the largest Israeli lobby in the US is threatening to provide evidence members of the organization regularly trafficked in classified US government information.
The claim comes in the midst of an increasingly ugly lawsuit in which parties have alleged or admitted to mass viewing of pornography among senior staffers at AIPAC as well as extra-marital affairs.
Steve Rosen, who was in charge of foreign policy issues at AIPAC until 2005, is suing his former employer for $20 million, alleging that AIPAC defamed him when they fired him. Rosen and colleague Keith Weissman were charged in 2004 with espionage for allegedly pressuring a Washington Post reporter into running classified US government information they had obtained about Iran. The charges were dropped last year, evidently due to lack of evidence.
But AIPAC fired Rosen years before the charges were dropped, on the grounds that Rosen's "conduct did not comport with what AIPAC would expect of its employees."
But Rosen disputes this, and his lawsuit aims to prove that what he allegedly did was standard practice at AIPAC. The Washington Post's Jeff Stein reports:
Rosen says his actions were common practice at the organization. He said his next move is to show that AIPAC, Washington’s major pro-Israeli lobbying group by far, regularly traffics in sensitive U.S. government information, especially material related to the Middle East.
"I will introduce documentary evidence that AIPAC approved of the receipt of classified information," he said by e-mail. "Most instances of actual receipt are hard to document, because orally received information rarely comes with classified stamps on it nor records alerts that the information is classified."
But Rosen said he would produce "statements of AIPAC employees to the FBI, internal documents, deposition statements, public statements and other evidence showing that [the] receipt of classified information by employees other than [himself] ... was condoned … for months prior to being condemned in March 2005 after threats from the prosecutors."
"Unfortunately for AIPAC, Rosen has 180 documents which could prove that Howard Kohr, AIPAC's executive director, and probably the AIPAC board as well, knew exactly what Rosen was doing," reports M.J. Rosenberg at Al-Jazeera.
He suggests that Rosen's threat to reveal AIPAC trafficking of data is meant to intimidate the lobby group into settling out of court. Making the lawsuit go away "will not be easy - even if Steve Rosen ultimately accepts a payoff from the organization and refrains from telling what he knows," Rosenberg writes.
Other elements of the lawsuit could prove embarrassing, if not politically toxic. Lawyers for AIPAC got Rosen to admit he viewed pornography on work computers, but Rosen has countered that the head of AIPAC and his closest colleagues openly watched porn at work. The Jewish Daily Forward reports:
"I witnessed [AIPAC executive director] Howard Kohr viewing pornographic material, [Kohr’s secretary] Annette Franzen viewing pornographic material, probably a dozen other members of the staff," Rosen said in his deposition. He added that, according to a Nielsen survey, more than a quarter of Americans regularly view pornographic websites at their workplace.
Later in his deposition, the former lobbyist also said he had heard from directors at AIPAC about their visits to prostitutes and he claimed Kohr had routinely used "locker room language" at the AIPAC offices.
Rosenberg posits that the lawsuit "could well destroy the lobby without ever making its way on to the front page. AIPAC is under siege, and is spending millions to stay alive."
Enhanced by Zemanta
Share:

Israel's Shabbos Goy


Why America will come to regret the craven deal Obama is offering Netanyahu.

By Christopher Hitchens

  "
Slate" - - Those of us who keep an eye on the parties of God are avid students of the weekly Sabbath sermons of Rabbi Ovadia Yosef. In these and other venues, usually broadcast, this elderly Sephardic ayatollah provides an action-packed diet that seldom disappoints. A few months ago, he favored his devout audience with a classic rant in which he called down curses on the Palestinian Arabs and their leaders, wishing that a plague would come and sweep them all away. Last month, he announced that the sole reason for the existence of gentiles was to perform menial services for Jews: After that, he opined, their usefulness was at an end. A huge hubbub led to his withdrawal of the first of these diatribes. (I would be interested to know if this was on partly theological grounds. After all, the local Palestinians may still have some labor to perform before the divine plan is through with them.) The second sermon, so far as I know, still stands without apology. Why on earth should anybody care about the ravings of this scrofulous medieval figure, who peppers his talk of non-Jews in Palestine with comparisons to snakes, monkeys, and other lesser creations, rather as Hamas and Hezbollah refer to the Jews? Well, one reason is that he is the spiritual leader of the Shas Party, an important member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition. Indeed, two key portfolios, of the Interior and of Construction and Housing, are held by Shas members named Eli Yishai and Ariel Atias.

Yishai recently delighted the Diaspora by saying that only those Jews who converted via the Orthodox route could carry "the Jewish gene." Atias has expressed alarm about the tendency of Israeli Arab citizens to try to live where they please—or "spread," as he phrases it—and has advocated a policy of segregation in housing within Israel proper. He also advocates the segregation by neighborhood of secular from Orthodox Jews, adding that he does not wish his own children to mix with their nonreligious peers. It is Yishai's ministry that is famous for making announcements about new "housing" developments outside Israel itself and in legally disputed territory. Very often, Netanyahu himself has claimed to be taken by surprise at these announcements, which usually involve tense areas of Jerusalem. Thus the huge embarrassment inflicted on Vice President Joe Biden earlier this year, when fresh settlement construction was proclaimed in the middle of his high-level visit. And thus the undisguised irritation of President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton last week, when yet another round of such housing was scheduled while Obama was in Asia and Netanyahu was in the United States. Apparently, the latest high-level round of the peace process has included the modest and tentative suggestion to Israel that such disclosures be timed with greater tact and coordination in the future.
It's not only the doings of his Interior and Housing ministries of which Netanyahu has to remain resolutely uninformed. His foreign minister is not a part of Israel's most important external negotiation. This is perhaps just as well, since the holder of the post, Avigdor Lieberman, regards the whole "process" as a waste of time. He said as much at the United Nations last September. It was patiently explained at that time that Netanyahu had not been favored with advance notice of the contents of the speech.
Lieberman has another distinction that I believe is unique. He does not live in the country whose foreign ministry he heads. He chooses, rather, to make his home in the West Bank settlement of Nokdim, a tenaciously held outcrop with a population of fewer than 1,000 people. The party which he heads—Yisrael Beytenu—is a nationalist rather than religious faction, but in a competition with Rabbi Yosef for vicious anti-Arab rhetoric, it's not immediately clear which one would emerge the winner.
Now we read that, in return for just 90 days of Israeli lenience on new settlement-building (this brief pause or "freeze" not to include the crucial precincts of East Jerusalem), Netanyahu is being enticed with "a package of security incentives and fighter jets worth $3 billion" and a promise that the United States government would veto any Palestinian counterproposal at the United Nations. Netanyahu, while graciously considering this offer, was initially reported as being unsure whether he "could win approval for the United States deal from his Cabinet." In other words, we must wait on the pleasure of Rabbi Yosef and Ministers Atias, Yishai, and Lieberman, who have the unusual ability to threaten Netanyahu from his right wing.
This is a national humiliation. Regardless of whether that bunch of clowns and thugs and racists "approve" of the Obama/Clinton grovel offer, there should be a unanimous demand that it be withdrawn.
The mathematics of the situation must be evident even to the meanest intelligence. In order for any talk of a two-state outcome to be even slightly realistic, there needs to be territory on which the second state can be built, or on which the other nation living in Palestine can govern itself. The aim of the extreme Israeli theocratic and chauvinist parties is plain and undisguised: Annex enough land to make this solution impossible, and either expel or repress the unwanted people. The policy of Netanyahu is likewise easy to read: Run out the clock by demanding concessions for something he has already agreed to in principle, appease the ultras he has appointed to his own government, and wait for a chance to blame Palestinian reaction for the inevitable failure.
The only mystery is this: Why does the United States acquiesce so wretchedly in its own disgrace at the hands of a virtual client state? A soft version of Rabbi Yosef's contemptuous view of the gentiles is the old concept of the shabbos goy: the non-Jew who is paid a trifling fee to turn out the lights or turn on the stove, or whatever else is needful to get around the more annoying regulations of the Sabbath. How the old buzzard must cackle when he sees the gentiles actually volunteering a bribe to do the lowly work! And lowly it is, involving the tearing-up of international law and U.N. resolutions and election promises, and the further dispossession and eviction of a people to whom we gave our word. This craven impotence will be noticed elsewhere, and by some very undesirable persons, and we will most certainly be made to regret it. For now, though, the shame.
Christopher Hitchens is a columnist for Vanity Fair and the Roger S. Mertz media fellow at the Hoover Institution.
Share:

Louis Farrakahn on Obama, the War on Terror and Israel




Louis Farrakhan is the American national representative of the Nation of Islam, a religious organization founded in July 1930 that aims to resurrect the spiritual, mental, social, and economic condition of the African American men and women of America.



In the following short interview with Al-Jazeerah News, he describes the Obama administration's use of FBI 'agent provocateurs' to entrap young Muslim men and frame them as 'terrorists'. He also provides a succinct analysis of the corrupt and cynical nature of the Israeli government. When told that he was "out of time" by the news anchor, Farrakahn ends with a most insightful comment.






Share:

Top Ten Signs You’re Suffering From Mis-Education

All Good Americans Have Been Mis-Educated Source: Top Ten Signs You’re Still Suffering From Mis-Education
  1. You think the Federal Reserve is “federal” and/or it is a “reserve” of money
  2. You think any former CIA officer in the media is really “former” or is telling the truth
  3. You think anybody allowed to speak repeatedly (twice) in the major media is telling the truth about anything important — politics, business, medicine, food, etc.
  4. You think the words “semite” and “semitic” equal “Jew” and “Jewish”
  5. You think the president of the USA is the most powerful person in the world
  6. You think Americans are the most powerful bankers in the world
  7. You think the top headquarters of our worst enemy is in Israel
  8. You think the top headquarters of our worst enemy is in the USA
  9. You think the USA ever won full independence from London
  10. You think there’s no hope of creating a true, honest, open, Constitutional democracy in the USA
Share:

In A Recession in America There is no money for Poor America but always money for Israel


U.S Grants Israel Incentives Package In Return For Freeze Extension

Israeli Ambassador in Washington, Michael Oren, confirmed that the United States granted Israel further guarantees and incentives in return for renewing the freeze on settlement activities for two or three more months.
In an interview with the Washington Post, Oren said that the Obama administration granted Israel a number of guarantees in an attempt to boost the efforts at resuming direct Palestinian-Israeli talks.

Part of the incentives is an American offer to grant Israel advanced diplomatic and military support in return for extending the settlement freeze for an additional 60 days.


Oren stated that the Palestinians must clearly and officially recognize the “legitimacy of the state of Israel” and to recognize the rights of the Jewish people in the region.


He said that in return, Israel must recognize the same legitimacy of a Palestinian state, and added that should the two parties fail do so, the conflict will never end.


Oren stated that the Arab League will be holding its meeting Friday to discuss the future of peace talks with Israel and added that the United States is trying to convince the Arab leaders and the Palestinian Authority not to quit talks with Israel.


The Israeli ambassador blamed the Palestinian Authority for the idleness in peace talks, saying that the P.A “wasted” eight months of the 9-month freeze period.


He also stated that the recently expired settlement freeze caused a diplomatic crisis for Benjamin Netanyahu.
Share:

Did Obama Free Israeli Spy Jonathan Pollard?



Antiwar radio host Scott Horton and Grant F. Smith discuss the Israeli proposal to free spy Jonathan Pollard in exchange for a temporary illegal settlement freeze to save the sputtering "peace process."  NYU reporter discusses Israeli espionage and lobbying.  Tanya Hsu analyzes Mavi Marmara timeline.

Obama Frees Pollard?
Audio Download: http://dissentradio.com/radio/10_10_01_smith.mp3
.00:02:50 Why free Jonathan Pollard?
00:04:35 How long has Israel's lobby been trying to free Pollard?
00:05:00 How does Pollard compare to previous Israel pardons?
00:10:41 Did Obama agree to pardon Jonathan Pollard?
00:14:10 What damage did Pollard cause to America?
00:15:25 Who provided Pollard's "safe house" and secrets?
00:16:16 What is the Israel lobby's strategy to avoid prosecution?
00:20:18 Are US Department of Justice pardons transparent ?
00:21:47 How does DOJ/administration clemency promote Israeli impunity?
00:22:30 Why are FBI reverse sting and Mossad false flag operations underway? (MP3 Audio)
**************************************************************
Israel's right hand on Capitol Hill
by Ishan Talukdar - New York University - Washington Square News
The committee definitely has the means to pressure politicians into capitulating to Israeli demands. In fact, AIPAC received funds from the Israeli government itself well into the 1960s. In addition, there have been several incidences and many allegations of espionage perpetrated by AIPAC, or with AIPAC as an intermediary, where information was passed to Israeli officials.
The problem we are faced with is a lobbying group with a substantial amount of power over our politicians. More

New Side-by-Side Gaza Flotilla Timeline Report Discredits Israeli Version of Events
0/07/2010 IBH FCO Report - analysis by Tanya Cariina Hsu
Conclusions show that Israel clearly manipulated evidence to bolster its argument that the attack on the Mavi Marmara was in self-defense against armed violent activists. Using second-by-second analysis, the reports shows how the six passengers killed were victims of execution-style murders by the Israeli soldiers. Report website

Share: