Shimon Peres praises the ADL
Founded 100 years ago to fight racism, the Anti-Defamation League has become first and foremost, a leading pro-Israel mouthpiece.
For the record re Shimon Peres:
"During Israel's 1996 "Grapes of Wrath" campaign in Lebanon and under the watch of Prime Minister Peres, the Qana massacre occurred.
"At a U.N. compound near the village of Qana, 800 Lebanese civilians sought refuge from the fighting. Showing utter disregard for both the U.N. and the civilians they sheltered, the IDF shelled the compound, killing 106 innocents and injuring more than 100.
"A U.N. investigation concluded it was unlikely that the shelling was due to gross technical or procedural errors, as Israel had first claimed. After constantly shifting explanations, Peres justified the attack by blaming Hezbollah, using the tired and discredited 'human shield' excuse. Other investigations were more forthright: an Amnesty International inquiry found that the attack was 'intentional and is condemned.' Similarly, Human Rights Watch's report stated, 'We have declared this a massacre that was intentional using very highly accurate missiles and explosives.' " (http://counterpunch.org/
Nazi Website Controlled by The ADL Is Used to Scare Jews & Launder Cash
![]() |
| This is my website, you stupid friggin’ Jews |
ADL Owns Ratfacedjews.com
by Gordon Duff
Is Rupert Murdoch ignorant or an agent of Zionist deception?
Alan Hart - In a recent speech at an ADL (Anti-Defamation League) dinner, Rupert Murdoch, arguably the most influential mainstream media chief on Planet Earth, made some extraordinary statements which must be challenged. But first it’s necessary for us all to be clear about what ADL’s role is.
Its proclaimed objective is to "fight anti-Semitism". In reality its main purpose under the leadership of Abe Foxman is to smear, harass, silence and preferably destroy those of all faiths and none who are critical of Zionism in action - critical of Israel’s policies in general and its contempt for international law in particular; and critical of the awesome power of the Zionist lobby, in America especially.
In his speech Murdoch said his own perspective on the evil of anti-Semitism was "simple". He put it this way (my emphasis added):
"We live in a world where there is an ongoing war against the Jews. For the first decades after Israel’s founding, this war was conventional in nature. The goal was straightforward - to use military force to overrun Israel."
That was Murdoch’s carefully understated way of endorsing Zionism’s assertion that for the first decades of its life Israel lived in danger of annihilation, the "driving into the sea" of its Jews. As I document in detail through the three volumes of the American edition of my book Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews, Israel’s existence was never, ever, in danger from any combination of Arab force. Zionism’s assertion to the contrary was the cover that allowed Israel to get away where it mattered most (in America and Western Europe) with presenting its aggression as self-defense and itself as the victim when, actually, it was and is the oppressor.
The main event during the period in which Murdoch asserted that the Arabs were trying to "overrun" Israel was the 1967 war. Zionism’s story of it, which the mainstream media still peddles to this day, is that Israel went to war either because the Arabs attacked first or were intending to attack. Both, the either and the or, are Zionist propaganda nonsense. It was a war of Israeli aggression.
I don’t expect Murdoch to pay any attention to what the Gentile me has to say on the subject, but if he is not an agent of Zionist deception (i.e. if he is merely ignorant), he ought to consider what various Israeli leaders have said. I quote them in America Takes Sides, War With Nasser Act II and the Creation of Greater Israel, Chapter 1 of Volume Three the American edition of my book, which is sub-titled Conflict Without End?
I preface the quotes of Israeli leaders with this observation.
"If the statement that the Arabs were not intending to attack Israel and that the existence of the Jewish state was not in danger was only that of a goy, it could be dismissed by Zionists as anti-Semitic conjecture. In fact the truth the statement represents was admitted by some of the key Israeli players - after the war, of course. Before we look at what actually happened in 1967 and why, here is a short summary of some pertinent, post-war Israeli confessions."
In an interview published in Le Monde on 28 February 1968, Israeli Chief of Staff Rabin said this: "I do not believe that Nasser wanted war. The two divisions which he sent into Sinai on 14 May would not have been enough to unleash an offensive against Israel. He knew it and we knew it."
On 14 April 1971, a report in the Israeli newspaper Al-Hamishmar contained the following statement by Mordecai Bentov, a member of the wartime national government. "The entire story of the danger of extermination was invented in every detail and exaggerated a posteriori to justify the annexation of new Arab territory."
On 4 April 1972, General Haim Bar-Lev, Rabin’s predecessor as chief of staff, was quoted in Ma’ariv as follows: "We were not threatened with genocide on the eve of the Six-Days war, and we had never thought of such a possibility."
In the same Israeli newspaper on the same day, General Ezer Weizman, Chief of Operations during the war and a nephew of Chaim Weizman, was quoted as saying: "There was never any danger of annihilation. This hypothesis has never been considered in any serious meeting."
In the spring of 1972, General Matetiyahu Peled, Chief of Logistical Command during the war and one of 12 members of Israel’s General Staff, addressed a political literary club in Tel Aviv. He said: "The thesis according to which the danger of genocide hung over us in June 1967, and according to which Israel was fighting for her very physical survival, was nothing but a bluff which was born and bred after the war." In a radio debate Peled said: "Israel was never in real danger and there was no evidence that Egypt had any intention of attacking Israel." He added that "Israeli intelligence knew that Egypt was not prepared for war."
In the same program Chaim Herzog (former DMI, future Israeli Ambassador to the UN and President of his state) said: "There was no danger of annihilation. Neither Israeli headquarters nor the Pentagon - as the memoirs of President Johnson proved - believed in this danger."
On 3 June 1972 Peled was even more explicit in an article of his own for Le Monde. He wrote: "All those stories about the huge danger we were facing because of our small territorial size, an argument expounded once the war was over, have never been considered in our calculations. While we proceeded towards the full mobilisation of our forces, no person in his right mind could believe that all this force was necessary to our 'defense’ against the Egyptian threat. This force was to crush once and for all the Egyptians at the military level and their Soviet masters at the political level. To pretend that the Egyptian forces concentrated on our borders were capable of threatening Israel’s existence does not only insult the intelligence of any person capable of analyzing this kind of situation, but is primarily an insult to the Israeli army."
The preference of some generals for truth-telling after the event provoked something of a debate in Israel, but it was short-lived. If some Israeli journalists had had their way, the generals would have kept their mouths shut. Weizman was one of those approached with the suggestion that he and others who wanted to speak out should "not exercise their inalienable right to free speech lest they prejudice world opinion and the Jewish diaspora against Israel."
It is not surprising that debate in Israel was shut down before it led to some serious soul-searching about the nature of the state and whether it should continue to live by the lie as well as the sword; but it is more than remarkable, I think, that the mainstream Western media continues to prefer the convenience of the Zionist myth to the reality of what happened in 1967 and why. When reporters and commentators have need today to make reference to the Six Days War, they still tell it like the Zionists said it was in 1967 rather than how it really was. Obviously there are still limits to how far the mainstream media is prepared to go in challenging the Zionist account of history, but it could also be that lazy journalism is a factor in the equation.
For those journalists, lazy or not, who might still have doubts about who started the Six Days War, here’s a quote from what Prime Minister Begin said in an unguarded, public moment in 1982. "In June 1967 we had a choice. The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches did not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us, We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him."
My own favourite Israeli quote is the one I use to draw the Prologue to Volume One of my book to a conclusion. In 1980 I had a number of conversations with the best and the brightest of Israel’s Directors of Military Intelligence, Major General (then retired) Sholmo Gazit. Over coffee one morning I said to him: "I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s all a myth. Israel’s existence has never, ever, been in danger." He replied: "The trouble with us Israelis is that we’ve become the victims of our own propaganda."
In his speech to the ADL dinner, Murdoch said that phase two of the "ongoing war against the Jews" (after the failure to "overrun" Israel by force) was "terrorism" He seems to have no idea of reality on this front either.
One of a number of summary truths about terrorism is this. In Palestine that became Israel, it was the Zionists who turned to terrorism first - to drive out the occupying British and then the indigenous Arabs.
Murdoch spoke of the terrorists targeting Israelis at home and broad - "from the massacre of Israeli athletes at Munich to the second intifada." Fact: All but two of the Israeli athletes in Munich were killed by German security forces after Israeli Defense Minister Dayan insisted, against Prime Minister Golda Meir’s own best judgement, on a shoot-out to prevent a negotiated end to the hostage drama. Fact: The second intifada, which PLO Chairman Arafat was doing his best to prevent, was provoked by Ariel Sharon to improve his prospects of becoming prime minister by seeing off a challenge from Netanyahu.
A second summary truth about Palestinian terrorism is this. The Palestinians were not and are not "at war with the Jews". Black September’s Munich operation, for example, was terrorism for a public relations purpose - to draw the attention of the world to the fact that the Palestinians existed, were occupied and oppressed and in need of some justice.
A summary truth about general Arab and wider Muslim terrorism is this. It is primarily a response of the weak and oppressed to Israel’s arrogance of power and insufferable self-righteousness; to the impotence, corruption and repression of Arab and other Muslim regimes which are correctly regarded by their masses as little more than puppets of America-and-Zionism; and to the deadly double-standard of Western foreign policy - in particular its unconditional support for Israel right or wrong. (In at least one respect the Arab and other Muslim masses have much more wisdom than Western leaders. They, Arab and Muslims masses, know that unconditional support for Israel right or wrong is not in anybody’s best interests, not even those of Israel’s Jews).
According to Murdoch "the war against the Jews" has now entered a new phase. "This," he said, "is the soft war that seeks to isolate Israel by delegitimizing it. The battleground is everywhere - the media… multinational organizations … NGOs. In this war, the aim is to make Israel a pariah."
It is true that in the eyes of many if not most peoples of the world (and probably many of their governments behind closed doors) Israel is increasingly being seen as a pariah state. But that’s a consequence of Israel’s policies and actions, war crimes and all.
What Murdoch sees as the rise of anti-Semitism is, in fact, the rise of anti-Israelism. The danger for the Jews of the world is that it will be transformed into violent anti-Semitism at a foreseeable point in the future if the Zionist state is not called and held to account for its past crimes and is allowed by the major powers to go on committing new ones.
It is a fact that prior to the obscenity of the Nazi holocaust, most Jews were opposed to Zionism’s colonial enterprise. One of their fears was that Zionism would one day provoke anti-Semitism if it was allowed by the big powers to have its way. As I never tire of writing and saying, this fear was given a fresh airing by Yehoshafat Harkabi, Israel’s longest serving Director of Military Intelligence. In 1986 he published a remarkable book, Israel’s Fateful Hour. It contains this warning (my emphasis added):
Israel is the criterion according to which all Jews will tend to be judged. Israel as a Jewish state is an example of the Jewish character, which finds free and concentrated expression within it. Anti-Semitism has deep and historical roots. Nevertheless, any flaw in Israeli conduct, which initially is cited as anti-Israelism, is likely to be transformed into empirical proof of the validity of anti-Semitism. It would be a tragic irony if the Jewish state, which was intended to solve the problem of anti-Semitism, was to become a factor in the rise of anti-Semitism. Israelis must be aware that the price of their misconduct is paid not only by them but also Jews throughout the world.
Nearly a quarter of a century on I think it can and should be said that Israel’s "misconduct" has become the prime factor in the equation that could transform anti-Israelism into anti-Semitism.
If I had the opportunity to address Mr. Murdoch directly, I would say to him the following. If you really care about the Jews (I mean the Jews as people as opposed to their money), you would put your media empire at the service of the truth of history.
I would also tell him that when I joined ITN (Independent Television News) as a very young reporter many years ago, its great editor-in-chief, Geoffrey Cox, gave me the mission statement in one short sentence. "Our job is to help keep democracy alive."
I would then say to Murdoch that my charge today is (generally speaking) that the mainstream media has betrayed democracy. And I would add, "You, sir, are the greatest betrayer, traitor, of them all."
ADL has lost real credibility Question is did it ever have any?
Tuesday’s article, “SJP listed as ‘anti-Israel,’” states Students for Justice in Palestine was listed as “anti-Israel” by the Anti-Defamation League. The Anti-Defamation League is a shameless apologist for the state crimes of Israel. Masquerading as a group that fights anti-semitism, the real purpose of the ADL is to defame anyone who dare question Israel’s foreign policy. In fact, the ADL went so far as to call Norman Finkelstein, a Jewish American intellectual whose parents survived the holocaust, a holocaust denier and anti-Semite because Finkelstein criticized Israeli policy.
The group has little commitment to civil rights or anti-discrimination work. The idea that a group that has fundamental objections to Israel’s foreign policy is “anti-Israel” is an idea one only finds taken seriously in dictatorships, where to disagree with decisions of the leader is a crime. If American’s truly care about Israeli people, they will disagree with Israel’s leaders and force them to accept the internationally agreed-upon peace solution. Otherwise, Israeli leaders will eventually destroy the two-state solution and evoke more war and terrorism against their citizens.
The fact that we are even talking about whether or not SJP is “anti-Israel” instead of more substantive things like the Goldstone report or the lack of U.S. involvement in a real peace process means the ADL has already done its job, distracting from real issues.
Class of 2010 Former Students for Justice in Palestine president
Dear ADL: I want to file a complaint for anti-Semitism and discrimination against the State of Israel
|
Bill Robinson vs. the ADL Thought Police
By Jeff Gates

When sociology Professor Bill Robinson stared down the Anti-Defamation League, it looked like a victory for academic freedom. Yet was it? Robinson was portrayed as an anti-Semite because he sent an email to students featuring a photo essay critical of Israel that had circulated online for weeks. While University of California administrators dallied, the ADL and its international network turned up the heat—signaling academics worldwide they could be next.It looked like progress when the faculty at UC Santa Barbara urged "changes in procedures to avoid improprieties and abuses in the future…." But was it? By then the ADL campaign had created the intended chilling effect. This silencing campaign was featured news for five time-critical months while a newly elected U.S. president was reassessing U.S.-Israeli relations. How can anyone calculate the full extent of the damage—not only to Robinson’s reputation and to the stature of the University of California but also to national security?
So where’s the victory? Clearly Robinson deserves acclaim for resisting pressure as the ADL deployed its most seasoned operatives, including Marvin Heir, a rabbi at the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles. Only an investigation can identify who mobilized the donor community that threatened UCSB Chancellor Henry Yang with the withdrawal of funds.
What was the motivation for this high profile intimidation campaign? Was the ADL driven simply by the discomfort that two students voiced on their receipt of his email criticizing Israeli policy? Or did the ADL network have its sights on a broader strategic goal?
Facts have since proven it was largely pro-Israelis who fixed the intelligence that manipulated the U.S. to invade Iraq. That same network has now mobilized to expand that war to Iran. A key barrier: the global condemnation of Israel’s brutal assault on Gaza. How does Tel Aviv limit the public relations fallout? On what leverage points should Israel focus to contain the censure while continuing to obscure Israel and pro-Israelis as the common source of this manipulation?
Aiding An Enemy Within?
The Founders faced a similar challenge during the Revolutionary War. How could they distinguish patriots from those loyal to a foreign nation? Knowing the vast risks that accompany betrayal, they lowered the evidentiary standard for treason. Guilt still required proof beyond a reasonable doubt but a conviction only required evidence of "adhering" to an enemy or giving them "aid and comfort." To remove all doubt about the gravity of this capital offense, they even included those relaxed standards in Article III of the U.S. Constitution.
Fast-forward two centuries to the Information Age and consider the challenge of distinguishing friend from foe. With a new president sworn into office on a platform promising change, how should Tel Aviv continue to conceal the fact that it was pro-Israelis who deceived the U.S. to wage war in Iraq for the expansionist goals of Greater Israel?
During the Democratic presidential primaries, Senator Barack Obama promised no change in U.S.-Israeli relations. But that pledge was made while he and Hillary Clinton were vying for the pro-Israeli vote. What about now—particularly now that he knows Israel scheduled its assault on Gaza between Christmas and the Obama inaugural—knowing that interval would ensure Tel Aviv could operate largely free of official criticism?
Campaigning for president is one thing. Serving as commander in chief is another. What became of the prospects for change after this professor of constitutional law took a constitutional oath that obliged him to defend the U.S. from all enemies—both foreign and domestic?
Based on the success of pro-Israelis in inducing the U.S. to invade Iraq, how does this international network best expand this war to Iran? To succeed again, how can Tel Aviv best control the risk that facts unhelpful to its agenda find their way into the marketplace of ideas?
How about this for a psyops strategy: launch an intimidation campaign on a high-profile campus and portray a critic as an anti-Semite for sharing photos that had been circulating for weeks on the Internet. Then threaten his job, smear his reputation, put him in fear of his physical safety and threaten to withhold critical funding. Then see if on-campus critics still dare to speak out.
While the Faculty Senate should be commended for its stance, one must ask: what took so long? And what will be done to ensure that never again is a professor on any University of California campus subjected to such abuse with the complicity of university administrators? What steps will be taken to ensure this conduct does not recur on campuses nationwide?
Where was UC President Mark Yudof as this intimidation campaign progressed with such well-timed success? What role was played by the pro-Israeli bias of his wife, Judith, the immediate past president of the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism representing 760 synagogues?
Where was the Board of Regents while this silencing campaign advanced between the invasion of Gaza and President Obama’s White House meeting with Likud Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu? Did Board of Regents chairman Richard Blum harbor an undisclosed bias that precluded him shutting down this ADL operation? How about his wife, pro-Israeli U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee? What role did bias play in a community-wide smear campaign led by Arthur Gross-Schaefer, a Santa Barbara rabbi?
Was this only an offense against a courageous professor who fought on while university administrators retreated? Or was this assault more strategic? The Faculty Senate cannot on its own correct these wrongs because key offenders remain beyond their reach. What they can—and must—do is dismiss any faculty member complicit in this operation, condemn any university administrator who failed to act promptly and rebuke complicit operatives in the community.
The reputation of Prof. Robinson was only grist for the same mill that churned out the phony intelligence required to induce the U.S. to war in Iraq. That same network of deceit now seeks to catalyze war with Iran. Robinson was not the target. His reputation was collateral damage. The target was the mindset of academics that—because of this assault—hesitated to criticize Israel.
Until steps are taken to deter future offenses, these psychological operations (psyops) will continue and the reputation of the U.S. will continue to be collateral damage. Most ominous of all, those who wage war "by way of deception" (the motto of the Israeli Mossad) will continue to displace the facts on which self-governance depends. Progress must be measured by how many educators grasp that what was done to one could be done to all.
*****************************************
Education – The Ultimate Battlefield
In unconventional warfare, the battlefield is the shared field of consciousness. Where does a "consensus" reside? That’s where battles are now waged for public opinion. Those who targeted University of California, Santa Barbara Professor Bill Robinson know that victory flows to those most adept at influencing the consensus mindset. Few know that better than the Anti-Defamation League.
For seasoned combatants, the psyops challenge lies in how best to displace facts with beliefs. The only modern component of this ancient craft is the means for taking such manipulation to global scale. The duplicity is the same regardless whether the operation creates a shared belief in Iraqi WMD, a shared consensus in the infallibility of unfettered financial markets or a shared opinion that Israel is a democracy and an ally. All false yet all widely believed to be true.
Robinson was smeared as an anti-Semite for sharing a photo essay with his students that was critical of Israeli policy. That essay first appeared in Adbusters, a magazine subtitled The Journal of the Mental Environment. That essay has since been posted on a website maintained by UCSB students in defense of academic freedom: http://sb4af.wordpress.com/robinson-case/
Kalle Lasn, founding editor of Adbusters, is a graphic artist who eventually awoke to the harm he was doing as an advertising executive. An Estonian, he saw firsthand how the Soviets exerted virtual control by manipulating the mental environment. In March 2004, Lasn published an article in Adbusters pointing out that, whereas less than two percent of Americans are Jewish, 26 of the top 50 neoconservatives advocating war in Iraq are Jewish (52%).
He titled the article: "Why Won’t Anyone Say They’re Jewish?" By ADL standards, that meant he was an "anti-Semite"—just for asking the question. What’s since been confirmed is that the bulk of those who fixed the intelligence around that predetermined goal were either Jewish or assets developed by operatives who were Jewish.
Displacement is how warfare is waged in the Information Age: displacing facts with beliefs. Why would anyone expect otherwise? Jewish critics of Israeli policy are "self-hating." Non-Jewish critics are anti-Semites, Jew haters and/or Holocaust deniers. Although those charges are fast losing their potency from overuse, their toxicity still retains enough force to silence critics—as shown by the global traction gained by this thought control operation on a University of California campus.
Sir Gerald Kaufman, British founder of Independent Jewish Voices, uses his position as a Member of Parliament to criticize Israeli policy. Members of his family perished at the hands of the Nazis and in the Holocaust. As one of the U.K.’s harshest critics of Israeli policies, he routinely compares the Jewish state’s treatment of Palestinians to Nazi Germany’s treatment of Jews—the same analogy for which Robinson (also Jewish) was smeared as an anti-Semite.
Kaufman’s heartfelt speech on Israel’s incursion into Gaza, given on the floor of the House of Commons, is a must-see for those concerned that criticism of Israeli policy remains absent on the floor of the U.S. Congress. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMGuYjt6CP8 [Readers can draw their own conclusions as to who would be motivated to corrupt this YouTube version of his remarks.]
The psyops specialists who coordinated this on-campus silencing campaign know where modern wars are waged: in the shared mindset. The war fought to invade Iraq was waged in the mental environment long before U.S. troops invaded Iraq. Now the U.S. appears guilty by its association with an extremist enclave infamous worldwide for its prowess at waging war by way of deception—and for its aptitude at deceiving the U.S. to fight those wars.
The U.S. invaded Iraq only after facts were displaced by manipulated beliefs. The litany of manufactured beliefs is long and varied: Iraqi WMD, Iraqi ties to Al Qaeda, Iraqi meetings with Al Qaeda in Prague, Iraqi acquisition of yellowcake uranium from Niger and the list goes on. None were factual; all were deployed to deceive. And to advance an Israeli agenda.
Remember the campaign to discredit Joe Wilson overseen by (Jewish) White House operative Lewis Libby, Vice President Cheney’s Chief of Staff? A former U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, Wilson was targeted by Libby for exposing the phony intelligence on uranium from Niger. Campaigns to deceive and discredit have long been key weapons in the Israeli arsenal of deceit.
Remember how Colin Powell was dispatched by pro-Israeli war-planners to the U.N. Security Council just weeks before the March 2003 invasion? Why Powell? To associate his hard-earned credibility with what we now know was false intelligence about Iraq’s mobile biological weapons laboratories. At every turn we find the displacement of facts with beliefs to manipulate decision-makers. That operation successfully discredited not only Powell and the U.S. but also the U.N., an organization that Tel Aviv fears may yet hold Israel accountable for its conduct under international law.
Intelligence on which the U.S. relied was fixed by pro-Israelis in pursuit of a predetermined agenda: the expansionist goals for Greater Israel. Phony intelligence persuaded Washington decision-makers to dispatch the U.S. military to wage a preemptive war not for American interests but for Tel Aviv. When waging unconventional warfare, by the time you see troops on the ground, those complicit are often pre-staging the next venue—as now with the Israeli push to attack Iran.
The ADL-coordinated intimidation campaign launched on the UCSB campus reflects the face of fascism in the Information Age. To respond effectively, the Senate Faculty must provide the tools that enable those targeted to grasp how facts are displaced with induced beliefs—in plain sight and, to date, with legal impunity. No one likes to be deceived. Once "the mark" grasps how they were manipulated, they will see for themselves who is complicit and why. That’s when long overdue accountability can begin.
To focus only on the means (such as the attack on Robinson) leaves the end obscure. And leaves the mark—including UC students—without the tools required to defend against such duplicity. For educators, that shortcoming would transform this potential triumph into an academic tragedy.
Jeff Gates: A widely acclaimed author, attorney, investment banker, educator and consultant to government, corporate and union leaders worldwide, Jeff Gates’ latest book is Guilt By Association—How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War (2008). His previous books include Democracy at Risk: Rescuing Main Street From Wall Street and The Ownership Solution: Toward a Shared Capitalism for the 21st Century. For two decades, an adviser to policy-makers worldwide. Counsel to the U.S. Senate Finance Committee (1980-87)—working with Senator Russell Long of Louisiana.
Beware of ADL-sponsored domestic spy bill presented as "Hate Crimes" bill
Rep. Virginia Foxx (R, NC) argued HR 1913 would move America “down a slippery slope” to loss of freedom as has happened in Canada and Europe, where imprisonment for “thought crimes” has become a regular occurrence.
Susan Fani of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights warns: “The problem in general with hate crimes legislation is that it invites the government to probe way beyond motive. And in instances like this, it trespasses on free speech and religious liberty.”
Although the bill “declares that nothing in this Act shall be construed to prohibit the exercise of Constitutionally-protected free speech,” it sets a dangerous precedent of punishing motivations rather than actions because the actions — stalking, assault, etc. — are already illegal.
Anisa Abd el Fattah, President of National Association of Muslim American Women (NAMAW) points out: “Before our Congress passes such a law there are many questions to be answered, the most important of which is ‘who’ will decide that a given act is a ‘hate
crime’?” The Jewish Anti-Defamation League (ADL) originally wrote this bill. Arab, Latino and African-American organisations support it because they hope that prosecuting “hate” will decrease racist attacks on their communities. Serious fears exist, however, about the government surveillance centre, given the highly politicised nature of hate crimes labeling.
The ADL, along with the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), is already heavily involved in Homeland Security’s locally based “fusion centres,” which collect personal data for intelligence databases that synchronise national intelligence collection with
local police.
ADL and SPLC have a record of illegally spying on American citizens and providing false information to law enforcement officials.
A fusion centre in Missouri recently distributed an “intelligence” document on “hate groups” to local police, which was written by the ADL and the SPLC. It instructed the police to look for Americans who were concerned about unemployment, taxes, illegal immigration, gangs, border security, abortion, high costs of living, gun restrictions, FEMA, the IRS, and the Federal Reserve, as well as supporters of third party presidential candidates! Mainstream Christian organisations that espouse a traditional orthodox view of homosexuality were lumped into a list filled with violent neo-Nazis and skinheads while Roman Catholic institutions were singled out as “encouraging anti-Semitism and ethnic and religious chauvinism.” The report also predictably vilified religiously observant Muslims and anti-war activists.
“There is no level of hate crime that is acceptable—period,” says Dan Stein, President of Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). “However, the SPLC’s calculated abuse of the term ‘hate group’ and manipulation of hate crime data for self-serving political interests is an affront to hate crime victims and those who advocate on their behalf.”
The Christian Anti-Defamation Commission declared, “If we were to apply the same twisted logic of the SPLC to the SPLC, it would have to label itself as a hate group because they are intolerant of conservative Christians.” Similarly, Hussein Ibish, a secular Arab-American lobbyist, could be charged with inciting hate crimes targeting Muslims and political activists, his compilation of anti-Arab hate crimes statistics for the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) aside.
Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) expressed concern about how the fusion system has been “monitoring the legal activities of American Muslims exercising their constitutional privileges” and the “use of McCarthy-era tactics, most notably dissemination of Islamophobic analysis by federally-funded
‘fusion centres’ to local law enforcement agencies.”
Americans for Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC), a citizens group in Missouri, issued a national advisory to all local, state and Federal law enforcement agencies and officers, including all DHS fusion centres, “warning against any reliance upon faulty and politicised research issued by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and Anti Defamation League (ADL)” that “cast suspicion on millions of Americans.”
Governor Peter Kinder took the advisory seriously and is now engaging in damage control.
He issued a public apology to Presidential candidates Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and Chuck Baldwin, and placed Missouri Public Safety Director John Britt on administrative leave pending an investigation of the absurd report.
America’s problems with intolerance do not result from the absence of hate crime laws but originate in structural problems associated with bigotries of government officials, and often involve conspiracies against rights.
Karin Friedemann is a Boston-based writer on Middle East affairs and US politics. She is Director of the Division on Muslim Civil Rights and Liberties for the National Association of Muslim American Women
'Anti-Semitic' Today's winner of the Anti-Semitic Card is Michigan State University and Desmond Tutu
Michigan State University in the U.S. has come under fire from the Anti-Defamation League for inviting South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu to speak at this year's commencement ceremony. Tutu is reknowned worldwide for his role in creating the Truth and Reconciliation Commission which helped bring about a peaceful transition from apartheid South Africa to desegregation.

Archbishop Desmond Tutu (file photo)
He was invited to be part of a human rights delegation by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Human Rights after a 2004 Israeli missile attack which killed an entire Palestinian family. But Israel denied him a visa, and the investigation of the attack was delayed for over three years, rendering it useless. Tutu has compared the treatment of Palestinians under Israeli occupation to the treatment of black South Africans under apartheid.
The ADL launched a similar challenge to the University of St Thomas in Minnesota when it invited Tutu to speak at their commencement in 2007. After pressure from the ADL, the University withdrew the invitation but later re-invited him a week before the ceremony (he was unable to attend). The University President Rev. Dennis Dease told an AP reporter at the time, "I have wrestled with what is the right thing to do in this situation, and I have concluded that I made the wrong decision earlier this year not to invite the archbishop. Although well intentioned, I did not have all of the facts and points of view, but now I do."
The President of Michigan State University, Lou Anna Simon, said that she would uphold the invitation to Desmond Tutu, despite the pressure from the ADL.
The ADL said that Tutu was anti-Semitic because of his support for a boycott of Israeli academic institutions. The group said the boycott was "based on ideas that are anti-Semitic and should be anathema to any institution of higher learning truly committed to academic freedom."
A similar boycott was successfully enacted against apartheid South Africa, which practiced policies that discriminated against indigenous Africans and people of mixed race. Israel also has race-based laws and policies that afford special rights to Jews while simultaneously reducing the rights of indigenous Palestinians, but supporters of Israeli policy say that these laws are not actually discriminatory.
Professor David Wiley, long-time head of the African Studies Department at the University, told an IMEMC reporter, “Archbishop Tutu has never made any statements against the Jewish people, but he has challenged Israeli policy. For the Anti-Defamation League to equate the two is dangerous and counter-productive to their cause.”
Congress prepares to pass another "I'm-a-Proud-Whore-for-Israel"-Bill
ADL Calls Oliphant Cartoon 'Hideously Anti-Semitic'
New York, NY, March 25, 2009 … The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) labeled a syndicated cartoon by Pat Oliphant appearing today in newspapers across the country and on the Internet as "hideously anti-Semitic" because of its use of Nazi-like imagery and hateful evocation of the Jewish Star of David.
The cartoon portrays a headless, jack-booted figure marching in a goose step with a sword in one hand and pushing a Star of David on a wheel with the other. The Jewish Star has fangs and is chasing after a woman carrying a child, labeled "Gaza."
Abraham H. Foxman, ADL National Director, issued the following statement:
Pat Oliphant's outlandish and offensive use of the Star of David in combination with Nazi-like imagery is hideously anti-Semitic. It employs Nazi imagery by portraying Israel as a jack-booted, goose-stepping headless apparition. The implication is of an Israeli policy without a head or a heart.
Israel's defensive military operation to protect the lives of its men, women and children who are being continuously bombarded by Hamas rocket attacks has been turned on its head to show the victims as heartless, headless aggressors.
What's got Abe Foxman's knickers in such a twist? This cartoon:

Continuously bombarded by Hamas bottle rockets? Yes, poor defenseless Israel is once again the victim.
Where's my hankies, I feel a good cry coming on!
Maybe if the cartoon had shown some headless Gazan kids, blown to pieces by some of Abe's buddies in the IDF, he'd like that better?
Or maybe the cartoon should of shown the wild animals in the Gaza Zoo that were machine gunned to death by IDF thugs, that would be pleasing to Abe?
How about some pics of the Gazan ambulances, medical clinics and food distribution centers that have been bombed into oblivion by the world's "most moral army," that would be A-OK with Abe, huh?
Mr. Oliphant better watch out! The Senate is passing another of their "I'm a Whore for Israel and Proud of It" resolutions that will make political cartoons and honest expressions of disgust with Israel's barbaric behavior illegal.
What's actually scaring fascist thugs like Foxman is that the world is getting wise to the #1 ME terrorist state and threat to world peace, Israel and that they might not be able to go on one of their regular killing sprees against Occupied Palestine without some repercussions.
Yes, that's real scary, isn't it Mr. Foxman?
ADL blasts Holocaust imagery in anti-Israel protests but I blast You Mr Foxman

The comparisons of Israel to Nazi Germany being made at protests worldwide against the IDF's Gaza operation are a "cynical perversion" of history that has no place in civil societies, the New York-based Anti Defamation League said Tuesday.
When we look at all the facts especially the latest of War Crimes being carried out in Gaza by Israel, Mr Foxman, a civil society would and should speak out against the Gaza Massacres being carried out by Israel. You hear me now Mr Foxman : I'm not comparing Israel to the Nazis I'm telling You Sir they are worse then the Nazis. And what part of the Holocaust were you in sir? Because anyone that would have been in a real holocaust with real danger for their lives would be able to relate to the Palestinians especially if they have a education or at least a half a clue to know what's really happening in Palestine.
You say "Comparisons of Israel to the Nazis are a deeply cynical perversion of history, an attempt to turn the tragedy that befell the Jewish people into a bludgeon against Israel," I say to you sir what is a tragedy that the Holocaust has been turned in a industry and the guilt trip card has to be put out of commission , yes, the card that allows you to claim Anti-Semitism and you can't use that word against jews so you call them lost or a self hating jew when anyone speaks out against Israel and the injustices against the Palestinians for the last 60 Years and let the Israeli establishment keep getting awy with murder.
Foxman I read that you were particularly deplored the fact that this Israeli Nazi comparison was being heard at demonstrations in the United States but not just the United States, it's the whole world sir. You see people are starting to wake up, they are getting more educated and going elsewhere to get their news because they know most of mainstream media is either Zionist owned/ or Influenced with heklp from Government.
"Offensive Holocaust comparisons and the use of Nazi imagery are deeply offensive and have no place in a civil society such as ours." you are quoted as saying. I say to you Sir, that millions of dollars and more like billions worldwide going to Israel each year to break international laws for Ethnic Cleansing by Israel is very offensive.
You feel offended Mr Foxman, oh poor you! I am deeply offended when I hear Palestinian Child from Gaza is asking, "What did we do to deserve this?" and "Why is the world watching without doing anything?" I am offended sir that those parents don't have any answers for them.
The anti-Israel demonstrations in major American cities have included expressions of support for Hamas, which is designated by the State Department as a foreign terror organization, as well as inflammatory anti-Israel and anti-Semitic rhetoric, the ADL says. I am surprised you don't want them all locked up for supporting Hamas A democratically elected body of Palestine or should we only support real Terror Organizations like Israel or George Bush & Company.
Just like the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising there is a Gaza Ghetto Uprising and that makes you mad, does it not? Mr Foxman. Resistance is Growing Mr Foxman, Can you hear it?
The Anti Defamation League Shelters Christian Zionism
An unnamed reporter from the Anti Defamation League (ADL) claimed to be present at the JAM Islamic conference for Peace in suburban Baltimore on August 16th where I was one of the speakers. My topic, Christian Zionism, may sound unusual for an Islamic conference, but not to the event sponsor, Dr. Kaukab Siddique, whose conference theme was unity for peace. *1)
The ADL took exception to a number of speakers, including former Attorney General, Ramsey Clark. “Peace” seems to be a threat to the ADL. In its official publication the ADL carried no less than three stories about the conference and had this to say about your writer: Charles ("Chuck") E. Carlson is a co-founder and director of We Hold These Truths, an Arizona-based Christian anti-Semitic group. We Hold These Truths has held demonstrations around the county outside churches it views as supporting Zionism. *2)
The ADL frequently arranges for interference with meetings where it does not want the subject matter aired. This writer has twice previously been among the scheduled speakers at meetings where the host hotel was intimidated to cancel the banquet room accommodations on the day of the event. I was told there was pressure from unnamed, but presumed powerful local businessmen thought to be associated with the ADL. In each case the hotel management caved under pressure, and at no small legal risk to their companies, they put the scheduled meeting in the street. In both cases the meeting, one in Sacramento CA and the other in Orange County CA were able to reconvene hastily elsewhere.
A more damaging case revealing how the ADL attempts to silence those exposing Christian Zionism. Duke University was the scheduled site of the Palestinian Solidarity Movement’s two-day conference on October 15, 2004. That time the Anti-Defamation League publicly objected to several speakers it labeled as “anti-Semites.” It also claimed one student speaker was prone to petty violence.
Christian Zionism was the subject of my lecture and workshop, the only ones on this subject, and was unfamiliar to the student leaders. They had been assured that my presentation was valuable to the conference. In the end, I, and only I, was banned from speaking. The ADL and several related individuals wrote to the Duke University President and published condemnations of speakers on the Internet, alleging in my case “notorious anti-Semitism.” Not one word was written about or quoted from my program, to which the ADL had full access. This is normal for the ADL. *3
Student leaders of the modestly aggressive Palestine Solidarity Movement (PSM) compromised with the ADL when they learned that all it really wanted was to remove Carlson and Carlson’s workshop on Christian Zionism from the program. The PSM outvoted other students who did not know they were removing a most vital issue that they needed to understand in their movement to save Palestine. The Roots of Christian Zionism is the one issue for which Israel has no answer, and which Christian Zionists cannot explain.
It appears the ADL did not care how much speakers argue for “divesture,” which was the underlying theme of the PSM, so long as the vital link between Jewish Zionism and the 70 million Christian Zionists who are its prime supporters was not exposed!
This conference was large enough and far-reaching enough to change the face of the Palestinian freedom movement among students. The ADL knew what the students did not know; they did not want Christian Zionism exposed. It is still notably absent from student programs.
The ADL continued to attack Carlson by name after the mugging at Duke. Unofficial ADL operatives performed damaging and slanderous acts against speakers. I discovered a Wall Street Journal story about myself printed on Jan 5, 2005, The Intifada Comes to Duke, by Eric Adler and Jack Langer *4)
Adler was then a PHD candidate and is now on the Duke faculty. Adler/Langer wrote:
‘One scheduled speaker, Charles Carlson, had openly called for lethal attacks against Israeli youth, declaring, "every young Israeli is military--they are all proper war targets," and that "each wedding, Passover celebration, or bar mitzvah [in Israel] is a potential military target."’
The problem with Adler's incendiary quote is that it is concoction. He lifted the quotes out of context, a common ADL trick that is hard to litigate, and much worse, he added two words and changed two others inside the quotation attributed to me, thereby changing my historic observation to a call for blood.
Adler’s quote is lifted from my story, Smart Bombs vs. Intelligent Bombs, May 4, 2002, which I wrote following a field trip to Israel and Gaza, discussed how and why 57 known young Philistine suicide bombers chose their targets. Most targets were buses with soldiers on board. A very few were social affairs where a large number of off-duty military would normally be congregated. These would seem to be normal military targets. This is the actual quote from my original story on our website:
“But all human bombs are certain to be intended for Israeli Military targets. Every bus, restaurant, bar, or theater is a military target. Each wedding, Passover celebration, Bar mitzvah is probably a military target with active military present.” *5
By reconstructing my paragraph Adler made me out to be an agitator or terrorist attempting to get Israeli children killed. This kind of defamation, more commonly known legally as slander or libel, could cause this author problems.
ADL’S volunteers perform most slanderous acts, as with Adler. Volunteer businessmen lean on hotel management, threatening them with undesirable press coverage and loss of business if they deal with "anti-Semites." The ADL uses the power of the local Jewish purse in the area where the event is scheduled. I know about this intimidation first hand from one Jim Friedman, a local ADL volunteer who attempted to intimidate me many years ago to stop writing. I wrote How the Anti Defamation League Controls its Opposition after I was mugged at Duke. *7
“Defamation” is an actionable tort in most states, but to litigate it, you must show you were damaged, show that the act was intentional, and prove the defaming statement was not true. The ADL and Adler could only have meant to defame me, since the Duke Conference was already over and done with.
The ADL is in the business of defaming people without exposing itself to these laws. It rarely sues anyone for libel or slander because to do so would require him or her to give proof of slander or libel. One would think the ADL would sue people for defaming Jews, but instead, the ADL defames others, calls names, and applies labels including its favorite, “anti-Semite.” The ADL has itself been successfully sued for libel and slander more than once. Here is what the ADL said about me at the recent Baltimore conference:
“The scheduled speakers promote varying degrees of hostility toward Israel. They include Charles E. Carlson, co-founder of We Hold These Truths, a notorious Arizona-based extremist group that focuses on propagating anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.”
The press release is damning but safe. Calling someone a “notorious anti-Semite" is a cheap shot, but an opinion that is hard to prove or disprove and pretty much protected by free speech. The ADL takes scores of cheap shots at anyone it does not like. Many, including the Palestine Solidarity Movement allow themselves to be compromised by the ADL venom, but it has lost its credibility.
Most informed people today regard the ADL as a professional liar. Its goal is not to protect Jews from defamation but to defame others with whom Jews disagree, or those who do not like the state of Israel and say so.
Earlier Zionists managed to get the famous Judeo-Christian Scofield Refercene bible to include “the sin of anti-Semitism” as a footnote on its page 19, stating, “for a nation to commit the sin of anti-Semitism will bring inevitable judgment.” Millions of Judeo-Christians fear offending Israel as if it was God. A small number of powerful ADL leaders fear losing Christian Zionist's support for their agenda. *6) Roots of Christian Zionism
Conclusion
The ADL protects Zionism and its nurse cow, Christian Zionism, by denouncing and defaming perceived enemies. Zionism is pathetically weak in numbers; it is reasonable to guess there are 50 to 70 Christian Zionists for every American Jewish Zionist.
Christian Zionists are taught that anti-Semitism is a sin punishable by God, that the State of Israel is the fulfillment of biblical prophesies, and that war in our time are a necessary part of these prophesies...these being hallmarks beliefs that identify Judeo-Christianity. There are thought to be 70 million Americans influenced by this sect, which took root in the middle 18th century and has become commonly identified today as Christian Zionism, and includes Mormons and most other 18th century American evangelicals.
The power of the ADL is given wings through the Christian Right; without them no one would need to fear the ADL. A permanent solution to the problems surrounding Zionism will be realized when “Judeo-Christians” return to following Christ, and not before, which begins with seeking peace.
ENDNOTES
*1) Far-Right and Muslim Extremists Gather in Baltimore Speaker Backgrounds
http://www.adl.org/main_Anti_Israel/jamaat_baltimore_conference.htm?Multi_page_sections=sHeading_3
*2) Jamaat Al-Muslimeen International Islamic Conference for Peace and Awareness http://jam4peace.org/default.aspx
*3 Duke University: Next Target of Anti-Israel Activists
http://www.adl.org/PresRele/IslME_62/4572-62.htm New York, NY, October 6, 2004
*4) The Intifada Comes to Duke, a university plays host to anti-Semites and terror advocates. By ERIC ADLER AND JACK LANGER
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110006102
* 5) Terrorism or Intelligent Bombs, by Charles E. Carlson 2002
(http://www.whtt.org/index.php?news=2&id=2505)
*6) Roots of Christian Zionism (www.whtt.org/show).
*7) How the Anti Defamation League Controls its Opposition
Charles E. Carlson, Oct 22, 2004, (http://whtt.org/index.php?news=2&id=473)
http://whtt.org/index.php?news=2&id=2548
German neo-Nazis: We're pro-Israel, condemn anti-Semitism
By Ofer Aderet, Haaretz Correspondent
Nazis against anti-Semitism? As bizarre as that sounds, a group of Germans which calls itself "National Socialists For Israel" launched its Web site in support of Israel.
"Stop the hatred of the Jewish people," the Web site reads. "The Jews are a healthy, strong nation."
The organization - whose members have yet to reveal themselves to the public - claims that Israel's right to exist is anchored in the principles of social Darwinism, the same principles which the Nazis adopted prior to the Second World War.
"Israel earned the right to live among the nations [after emerging] from unending wars," the group writes on the site. "Israel also has a right to exist. This nation also has culture... The nation of Israel is appreciated... It is our duty, as neo-Nazis, to defend this supreme success. Not just for the German people and the European cultural sphere, but also, especially, for Israel."
As such, "Nazis for Israel" also leveled criticism at their colleagues in the neo-Nazi National Democratic Party (NPD), calling them "politicos, cowards, and reactionaries."
"Show us proof of a Jewish plot to dominate the world," they wrote in a rare manifesto which was posted on their Web site.
These unusual statements on the internet compliment the group's other public campaigns, including the dissemination of bumper stickers. One of the stickers features a picture of Reinhard Heydrich, the senior Nazi official who chaired the Wansee Conference where the Final Solution was hatched. Underneath the photo reads: "As a Nazi, I'm a Zionist."
Another sticker shows a photo of Israel Defense Forces soldiers during the Second Lebanon War under the heading: "2,000 years of struggling to survive - respect to those worthy of it."
In terms of the group's attitude towards the Holocaust, the organization says: "We must view what is referred to as 'the Holocaust' within the context of acts of self-defense undertaken by nations under threat." It added, however, "that there is no justification for it." Instead, the Nazis ought to have supported the Zionist cause, the group states.
The group claims it held its first meeting of activists in Berlin last month. It said the meeting touched on issues ranging from "solidarity with Israel, anti-Semitism, capitalism, and Islam."
Exciting Triumph Over Censorship
We're pleased to give you some very exciting news.
From a story posted not too long ago
(below Link)
http://windowintopalestine.blogspot.com/
2008/02/effort-to-censor-if-americans-knew.html
The Greenwich Library has reversed its initial
decision to cancel Alison Weir's presentations
and they are now going forward as planned,
Thursday evening at 7 PM and Saturday
morning at 10:30 AM (details below).
Even more exciting, they have decided that
they will give us, at no cost, the large
auditorium that holds 368 people instead
of the small meeting room (60-person capacity)
we had initially reserved. They feel that
given the amount of publicity that has been
generated over this event, the larger space
will be required. We hope as many people as
possible will attend! (By the way, they are
also providing, at their cost, a technician to
manage the excellent audio visual
equipment that comes with the room.)
During our meeting with library officials,
they told us that they had reversed their
decision after consulting with their attorney,
who explained to them that their stated
purpose for canceling the talks --
that they allegedly violated "public sensitivities"
-- was illegal under the First Amendment.
In addition, they explained to us that one of
the motivating factors in their original decision
to cancel the event was information they
had been given that the ADL would
become involved and that there would be
a need for a "large police presence."
There has been significant press coverage of
this controversy (see below) -- it was the
lead front page story in the local daily
newspaper, was featured on a radio news
report this morning, and is being aired
tonight on a local television news broadcast.
Yesterday, incidentally, we ran a second ad
similar to the first one, but that told about
the library's plans to cancel the event.
You can view the new ad here:
http://www.ifamericansknew.org
GreenwichAd-censored
Once again, if you are in the area, please
make every effort to attend
one or both lectures:
February 14, 2008
7 pm
Greenwich Public Library
101 West Putnam Ave., Greenwich, CT
February 16, 2008
10:30 am
Greenwich Public Library
101 West Putnam Ave., Greenwich, CT
Greenwich Time: Speaker vows to continue
after Greenwich Library cancels lecture -
http://www.greenwichtime.com
/scn-gt-libraryfeb13
Boston Globe: Greenwich Library in
fracas over Mideast lectures
- http://www.boston.com/news
THE ZIONIST MAFIA hides behind ADL's anti-Semetic witch-hunts
have trusted us?
We were a bunch of Russians;
socialist Russians.”
- Isser Harel, founder of Israeli intelligence,
on U.S. relations with Israel
As German Lawyer Sylvia Stolz (convicted to
3.5 years for telling it like it is about
WWII) said, the criminals are in control.
Bitterly, former Israeli Prime Minister David
Ben-Gurion referred to
Mussolini admirer Vladimir Jabotinsky, as
"Vladimir Hitler". In the process leading to
the establishment of the state of Israel, the faction
of the Irgun ("The Organization"),
linked to Mussolini-admirer Jabotinsky, was something
which most Jews, worldwide,
denounced in fearful whispers.
The hard-core of the Irgun were fascitsts by profession,
politically allied with Mussolini, strongly objecting
to Adolf Hitler's anti-Semitism,
but not Hitler's other fascists crimes.
At the core, they were also gangsters, partly
recruited from the circles of organized crime,
and notorious for gangsters' methods of
settling political differences with Irgun critics.
The Jewish ring reaches high into the
ranks of the Executive Branch of the U.S. government,
into the Congress, and extends its
wicked influence into the federal court.
This is not merely an Israeli spy-ring, it is a
spy-ring operating under the Israeli flag, but
controlled by a network of Soviet agents,
centered around the notorious Armand Hammer
and the Bronfman family interests. Behind
the ring, is the second generation of the Irgun
apparatus of the late 1940s.
The extensive history of Israeli spying against the
United States is reported in return
for the Russia's release of Soviet Jews, the Israeli
have passed on material to the
Russians as a quid pro quo. The Russians
very much want to get back into the Israeli
picture. They want a presence there, and the
Russians are now pushing this relationship
as far as they can. Highly placed sources in Israel,
date former defence Minister Ariel
Sharon's negotiations with Moscow to approximately
1978. The best corroborated evidence
currently, is that Sharon became a Soviet asset about
1981. When discussing this
problem, most intelligence experts point to
Sharon's surreptitious trips into the Soviet
bloc.
A brief background
Shortly after the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution,
Bolshevik leader Leon Trotsky worked with a
group of Polish Bolshevisks, to set up a now-
famous Russian foreign-intelligence
capability known as "The Trust". The Trust was a
network of financial interests closely
associated with the Communist International's
apparatus outside Russia. There is one
important feature of The Trust, which must be
emphasized to understand the mechanics of
this particular Israeli spy-ring. Most of the
literature on the subject of the Trust,
mistakenly, proposes that the Trust was
created after the 1917 Russian Revolution. It is
true, that the Trust as such was organized
by Polish Bolsheviks, such as Felix
Dzerzinskii, working closely with Leon Trotsky,
and with the assistance of British spy
Sidney Reilly and of the patron of today's Jon
Speller, Commander Sergius Riis. Up to
that point, such reports are factually
true, but profoundly misleading.
Trust had been a pre-revolutionary associate
of the vast, immensely funded operation of
Alexander Helphand's (Parvus's). The point
to be grasped, is that all modern radicalism
in Europe and the Americas, has been established
under the sponsorship of wealthy
financier family- interests. The Jacobins under
Robespierre, Danton, and Marat, were
created and backed by powerful Swiss banking
families from Geneva and Lausanne, with
support from the British East India Company's
Shelbourne, Pitt, and Bentham, in London.
The French utopian socialists of the early 19th
century, were funded and steered by the
same banking circles.
The Jewish component of the funding of the Russian
Mensheviks and Bolsheviks, is only an
aspect of the operations centered in Parvus's
networks. There are two areas of the
pre-1917 map of Eastern Europe, on which to
concentrate attention, to understand the
Jewish-financier component of the Soviet Trust
organization. The most important is the
city of Odessa and nearby Bessarabia.
The second is the old Livonian city of Vilna,
dominated by Jewish light-industry
manufacturers; it was the Vilna-based apparatus which
had been the network smuggling funds to
Plekhanov's circles in Switzerland, and smuggled
Russian Marxist literature into Russia.
Both Sidney Reilly and Parvus originated
from Odessa, and Trotsky's earliest political
career was centered there. Many of the
Jewish gangster-families of Canada and the United
States, were immigrants from this region
of Russia and Romania. Once Russia had both
fission and fusion arsenals, and, by 1956,
had established unchallenged control over the
new colonies in Eastern Europe, Russia was
prepared to restore the partnership with the
Western factions of the Trust, and Western
-based elements of the old Communist
International apparatus.
In the English-speaking world, it is the
British, Canadian, and U.S.A. variety of
wealthy Soviet fellow-travellers, such as
Averell and Pamela Harriman, McGeorge Bundy,
Henry A. Kissinger, David Rockefeller, and
so forth, which are most noticeable. The
innermost thinking of the Western Trust
partners can be found on Venice's island of St.
George Major, the site of the Cini Foundation.
The Jewish component of the Trust is run
from the Venice of Parvus's sponsor, Count
Volpi di Misurata, as it has been since the
13th century. The center of everything
dirty penetrating Jewish circles, since the 13th
century, to the present day, is the Luzzatto
family of Venice: the Luzzattos, Recanati,
and the Syrian Jewish families of Aleppo:
the Jewish families adjunct to the phanariots
of the old Byzantine and the Ottoman empires.
Russia's main satrapal power in the Middle
East and the Mediterranean. The power of that
new Venice would flow from its dominance
in international gun-smuggling, drug-running,
money-laundering, and other organized
criminal activities. A key included feature of
Israel's "Greater" destiny is the permanent
annexation and settlement of the West Bank,
with 1.3 million Jews, by not later than the
year 2010, according to the Sharon Plan.
However, the one thing required besides land
to realize the West Bank policy, is warm
bodies to occupy that land. This was the
primacy topic of well-publicized discussions
between Trust agents Armand Hammer
and Edgar Bronfman's brother Charles, and Soviet
party leader Mikhail Gorbachov. This is
also the crucial feature of Ariel Sharon's
"Project Independence", which has brought
together top Jewish financiers cum
organized-crime figures, such as Hammer,
Bronfman, Max Fisher, and Kenneth Bialkin, to
discuss "financial investments" in Israel.
If the Israelis carry out their end of the
bargain, the Russians will allow up to
500,000 Russian Jews to emigrate to
Israel, if and only if, they agree to settle
on the
West Bank. Elaborated arrangements
were afoot to bypass the traditional emigration route
through Austria - and thereby prevent the
majority of emigres from typically changing
course for America. Edgar Bronfman
admitted that as the result of his negotiations with
the Soviets on behalf of the Israeli
government, the Soviets are prepared to release
400,000 Soviet Jews, if the Israelis
will aid them in getting technology from the United
States.
The Landsky Plan
During or about 1967, with the accession of
the Trust's agent, Yuri Andropov, to the
leadership of the Soviet KGB, the Russians
began to move directly into major
drug-running operations against the West.
During the same period, leading figures in the
Irgun apparatus took a decision to attempt
to bring their leading Jewish organizes-crime
collaborators in the West to Israel, as a means
of turning Israel into a major center
for all aspects of organized crime, including
gun and dope running and money laundering.
In 1968, Israeli Finance Minister Pinchas
Sapir, the creator of Israel's "offshore"
banking system, sponsored a "millionaires
conference" in Jerusalem. All in attendence
were in one way or another connected to
the Israeli intelligence apparatus responsible
for the weapons and money that helped
create Israel in 1948. Among them were
: Louis
Boyar and Sam Rothberg - Henry Crown -
Max Fisher - Ray Wolfe - Shaul Eisenberg -
Raphael Recanati - Philip Klutznik.
Out of this conference, the Israel Corporation
was created, an official government
corporation. It was later exposed for illegal
laundering of funds into the Banque du
Credit International, set up by Tibor Rosenbaum
and Pinchas Sapir. The first mobster to
come to Israel was Joe Stacher, Lansky's
life-long associate. Stacher, who faced five
years in prison in the United States, was
brought over at the instigation of Haim
Bassoc, a leading member of the National
Religious Party, and his close friend, Rabbi
Menachem Porush, a leader of Agudat Israel.
These organizations were leading factional
allies of Menachem Begin's Herut party, and
backers of the terrorist Gush Emunim
settlement sect. Stacher and Landsky began
heavily funding several Agudat Yeshivas, and
became backers of West Bank settlements.
The public embrace of leading international
mobsters by political and religious leaders
in Israel was only that, a public display of a
long-term relationship dating from the
origins of the Israeli state itself. Israel's
creation following World War II depended
upon the help of British intelligence's
Special Operations Executive (SOE) under Col.
William Stephenson.
Stephenson incorporated these mobsters into
the SOE's network, on the original pretext
that they would be useful in anti-Nazi activities
in the United States and Italy.
Stephenson's top aide in the project was Major
Louis Mortimer Bloomfield, who, although
a Canadian subject, became the principal
recruiter for the FBI's Division 5
counterintelligence section. Bloomfield, of
the elite Order of Malta (Hospitallers),
until his death in 1984. It was precisely
this network that was utilized for the
post-war creation of Israel. Exemplary of
the network was the Sonneborn Institute. The
express purpose of the Institute was to
provide the Haganah, and later, the Irgun, with
weapons and money. The leading personnel
of the Institute included :
Henry Morgenthau, Jr. Former Secretary of the
Treasury. He was coordinating Sonneborn
fundraising and illegal money-transfer. Teddy
Kollek. Former Haganah chief in New York.
Later, he became the mayor of Jerusalem.
Major Louis Mortimer Bloomfield. He supervised
the organized crime networks, he also
served for SOE's Division 5 of the FBI. Adolf
Schwimmer. He functioned as on-the
ground smuggling coordinator. Later, he founded
Israeli Aircraft Industries, a major weapons
conduit for Israel to this day. He was also
a business partner of Shaul Eisenberg, the main
coordinator of Israeli gun-running
activity today.
The same networks and routes utilized for
bootlegging, after prohibition, were used for
drug trafficking. The drug supply was that
previously established by Arnold Rothstein in
Shanghai and Hong Kong.
The Landscam Scandal
The real story behing the landscam scandal
broke in the Israeli press. Two Israeli land
dealers, Edmund Levy and Ze'ev Golan, were
accused of forging a document allowing them
to sell the land of a Palestinian family. The plan
directed "Gush Emunim" organization
in setting up sattelite settlements on the edge
of older ones, thus enabling them to
portray these as merely extensions of existing
settlements, not new ones. This is
exactly what is happening now inspite the
peace accord.
In 1979, an Israeli high court ruled that West
Bank land could be bought privately by
individual Israelis. In addition it delivered a
ruling that would rapidly expand the
amount of land in Israeli hands. That process
enable Israel to retain today 64% of the
land surface in the West Bank and 40% of the
land surface in Gaza, even after the
redeployment of January 1996. (The activity
of land confiscations by the military
occupation apparatus is also included in the figure).
Israel is seeking to completely redeem
Jerusalem. The estimate of funds necessary has
been cited as $ 100 million. Contributions
to this plot are coming from : 1- Tefahot
Mortgage Bank 2- North American Bank of
Israel 3- United Mizrahi Bank 4- Cyril Stein 5-
PEF (israel Endowment Funds) 6- Robert
Jacobs 7- Abraham Dwek 8- Albert Kaplan 9- Dr.
Irving Moscowitz 10- Terry Risenhoover
11- Douglas Krieger 12- Pastor James Deloach 13-
Dr. Charles Monroe 14- Michael and Barbara Ledeen
15- Lambert Dolphin 16- Pat Robertson
17- Joseph Churba 18- Stanley Goldfoot
19- Yuval Ne'eman 20- Geula Cohen 21- Gershon
Solomon 22- Eduardo Recanati 23- Dov Schilansky
24- Yisrael Medad 25- Asher Kaufman
Israel is unwilling to accept any kind of
negotiations regarding the final status of
Jerusalem in the current peace talks.
Whose ally is Israel ?
On Nov. 21, 1985, the American people were
informed that a U.S. Naval Intelligence
specialist named Jonathan Jay Pollard had been
apprehended that day by the FBI, at the
Israeli embassy in Washington. Pollard had
been confronted by the FBI three days
earlier, with solid proof that he was spying
for Israel. Pollard was an Israeli agent.
But he may or may not have known that he
was actually a Soviet agent. The unit of the
Israeli secret service for which Pollard worked,
sought to obtain U.S. secrets for the
purpose of passing them on to the Russians.
Pollard was carrying the day of his arrest
60 classified documents relating to U.S.
Intelligence-gathering operations of the
anti-terrorist Alert Center.
Since 1976 the Israeli secret services
assembled several of its top operatives in the
U.S. congress and defence establishment
to form a network inside USA.
Three overlapping
institutions currently used by the
Israeli intelligence: 1- The Jewish Institute of
National Security Affairs (JINSA).
2- Americans for a safe Israel (ASI). 3- Individual
cells in the National Security Council,
the U.S. State Department, and the U.S. Justice
Department, and a network within the
American press. Some of these figures are Elliot
Abrams, Bernard Kalb, Peter Rodman,
Judge Abraham Sofaer.
Anti-Defamation League ADL
The Anti-Defamation League ADL founded in 1908
by Canon Edward West, a public relations
division of B'nai B'rith. The ADL is considered to be
the most powerful organization in
the USA. Las Vegas businessman Morris Barney
Dalitz, one of the most important figures
of the ADL is one of the most important figures
in organized crime over a period of
sixty years, and as a lifetime right-hand man to
organized crime's 20th-century, Meyer
Lansky, known as the godfather of organized
crime.
Dalitz was well aware of the fact that the ADL
was, from its founding, a powerful secret
arm of the National Crime Syndicate. Without
the ADL's undaunted "public relations" work
on behalf of organized crime, the USA would
have never been flooded with illegal drugs
and gangsters.
On the Canadian side, the booze was
manufactured by the Bronfman Gang,
led by Sam and
Abe Bronfman, second generation Romanian
immigrants whose father had been brought over
to Canada by the B'nai B'rith allied Baron de
Hirsch Fund. Their pure drug company was
established with the help of the Hudson's Bay
Company to manufacture illegal Whiskey. By
the beginning of the 1980's, drug money-narco-
dollars- had already became the primary
source of liquidity to fuel the stock market and
real estate speculative bubbles
facilitated by the Carter and Reagan
administration's deregulation of the banking and
brokerage industries. As the power of
drug money grew, so too did the political and
financial clout of the ADL.
Since December 1985, the FBI admitted that
a "Jewish underground" had emerged as a
serious terrorist threat to the United States
of America.
Excerpts from:
http://msanews.mynet.net
MSANEWS/199605/19960509.5.html
<http://www.hiddenmysteries.org
/pics/mideye.gif>
Notice: TGS HiddenMysteries and/or
the donor of this material may or may not agree with
all the data or conclusions of this data.
It is presented here 'as is' for your benefit
and research. Material for these pages
are sent from around the world. If by chance
there is a copyrighted article posted which
the author does not want read, email the
webmaster and it will be removed. If proper
credit for authorship is not noted please
email the webmaster for corrections to be posted.





