Gaza’s Ark In defiance of Israel’s illegal blockade the Gaza Siege
FAQ
- Gaza’s Ark will attempt to break the “other side” of the Israeli blockade, which prevents the Palestinians of Gaza from sailing from their shores to fish or export — both needed to support a productive economy. In contrast, the emphasis of the flotillas was on bringing internationals and emergency aid into Gaza.
- Gaza’s Ark will be built in Gaza by Palestinian hands and expertise (with international assistance when requested), and will carry Palestinian products for buyers who sign contracts in advance. The entire initiative is focused on building hope by showcasing skills within Gaza and bringing visibility to the restrictions that prevent the population from sustaining a viable economy.
- Gaza’s Ark also will contribute to revitalizing the dwindling shipbuilding industry in Gaza and help ensure the transmission of this disappearing expertise (another effect of the blockade) to younger generations.
- Although the initiative will help in a very limited manner to alleviate Gaza’s unemployment crisis by paying wages to the boat builders, Gaza’s Ark is not an aid project. It is a peaceful action to challenge the blockade, which Israel unilaterally and unreasonably enforces on Gaza.
A baby that died in Gaza is Israel's latest victim

the southern Gaza Strip March 24, 2012.(REUTERS/ Ibraheem Abu Mustafa)
Gaza medical spokesman Adham Abu Salmiya confirmed the incident, adding that the infant was born with respiratory problems and doctors had recommended the use of mechanical breathing apparatus to be used at home.
The father of the child had turned on the apparatus before going to sleep but during the night a power cut caused it to switch off, resulting in the infant's death, Hamas' Al-Aqsa TV reported.
The child was the "first victim of the current power crisis in Gaza," Abu Salmiya said, warning that the medical sector in the coastal enclave is in jeopardy.
Recent fuel shortages have had a catastrophic effect on daily life in the Gaza Strip, with people facing daily power cuts of up to 18 hours a day.
Remembering Gaza
|
Tel: 020 7700 6192Fax: 020 7609 7779
Email: info@palestinecampaign.org
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!
5 Years & Counting...The Gaza Siege Continues

Source &; More Beautiful Artwork of Mohammed Hassona at his Weblog
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!
Q&A: Why Israel's siege is illegal
| |
| |
Israel denies that it occupies Gaza, but it still maintains "effective control" over the territory [AFP]The International Committee of the Red Cross has described Israel's blockade of Gaza as a violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention. That conclusion rests on the Israeli government' status as an occupying power in Gaza, which assigns it certain obligations to the people of Gaza. Those obligations are spelt out in detail by the Fourth Geneva Convention. At their most basic, though, they require Israel to provide for the basic needs of the people, particularly food and medical care.
The convention also requires the occupying power to allow sufficient shipments of aid - food, clothing, medical supplies and other essentials - and to take steps to preserve the health care system in the occupied territory. Many Gazans rely on generators for power; their improper use has killed more than 100 people Israel does not meet those basic requirements, according to many observers. Eighty per cent of people living in Gaza rely on food aid to survive; 14 per cent of children suffer from stunted growth due to malnutrition. Power cuts are routine: 98 per cent of the population copes with routine blackouts. Fuel supplies are heavily restricted. More than 100 basic medicines are unavailable in Gaza, and the territory’s few remaining hospitals - several were damaged during the 2008-2009 Israeli war in Gaza - lack basic supplies and equipment. But didn't Israel withdraw from Gaza? How is it still an occupying power?It’s true that the Israeli government no longer has a presence inside the Gaza Strip. Former Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon ordered the withdrawal of all Israelis (including both soldiers and settlers) from the territory in his 2005 "unilateral disengagement plan". But the Fourth Geneva Convention applies whenever a state has "effective control" over a territory. The Israeli government still controls Gaza’s airspace, and its land and sea borders. The only goods and people allowed into Gaza are those approved by the Israeli government. Last month’s raid on the aid flotilla bound for Gaza is an instructive example. The organisers of the flotilla say their boats were on course to travel through Gazan waters, not Israeli waters. But the Israeli army still attacked the flotilla to prevent it from entering Gaza - showing that Israel maintains control over Gaza. If there was no occupation, would the blockade still be illegal?The principle of “proportionality” is central to international law: The military advantage gained by an action must outweigh the harm caused to the civilian population. Douglas Guilfoyle, a maritime legal expert, says the blockade does not meet the proportionality test The blockade does not meet this test. It imposes hardships on the entire population of Gaza - 1.5 million people - purportedly in order to achieve a limited military aim: preventing Hamas from firing rockets at Israel. What’s more, documents revealed last week by the Israeli human rights organisation Gisha show that the blockade actually has a political aim, not a military one. A written statement from the Israeli government described the blockade as "economic warfare" and said it was intended to break Hamas’s control over the government in Gaza. What about the Egyptian government?The Egyptian border crossing with Gaza, at Rafah, has been mostly sealed since Hamas took power in June of 2007. (The Egyptian government reopened the crossing earlier this month following Israel’s raid on the aid flotilla.) But Egypt is not an occupying power in Gaza - it does not exercise "effective control" over the territory - so, whatever the moral and political arguments against its blockade, it is not required to apply the same legal standard as Israel. |
Obama tries to clean his hands of the blood from the Siege of Gaza
Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri said Thursday that the aid package that Obama has offered is just a number.
The comments come a day after Obama pledged a 400-million-dollar aid package for the Gaza Strip during his meeting with the acting Palestinian Authority Chief Mahmoud Abbas in Washington.
Abu Zuhri said such US offers are only meant to "prettify" the image of Israel and allow it to proceed with its criminal activities, including the siege of Gaza.
Obama's offer was "problematic and empty of meaning because they are part of a US policy to prettify the siege of Gaza," he said.
"This is what prettifies the image of the occupation and allows it to continue its criminal policies," Abu Zuhri added.
The Israeli blockade has deprived some 1.5 million people in Gaza of food, fuel and other necessities since 2007.
The Hamas official also criticized the Palestinian Authority for agreeing to negotiations with Israel after Tel Aviv's deadly attack on the Gaza-bound Freedom Flotilla.
"Abbas' statements that he will stick to negotiations with the Israeli occupation is a treacherous stab in the back of the Palestinian people in light of the massacre of the Freedom Flotilla," AFP quoted Abu Zuhri as saying.
At least eight Turkish nationals were killed during the assault, which left at least 20 activists dead and injured dozens more on May 31.
The deadly attack on the Freedom Flotilla convoy, which was carrying humanitarian aid to the besieged Gaza Strip, has provoked an international outcry.
The Gaza Siege is a testament to the Israeli regime's disregard of law, decency and morality!
The three year old siege on the Gaza Strip and its 1.5 million inhabitants is a testament to the Israeli regime's disregard of law, decency and morality. This siege amounts to collective punishment, an action outlawed by various conventions and humanitarian laws. This is not to mention the suffering and humanitarian crisis caused by this law. This siege has been disgracefully condoned by the "international community" and justified by the "free world" as a measure that safegurads the security of the Israeli regime.
The same position was applied to the various humanitarian aid ships that were attacked and abuducted in international waters, and the aid carried by those ships confiscated. The killing of 9 Turkish activists on the the Freedom Flotilla on 1 June brought an abrupt end to international silence regarding the siege. It is unfortunate that the world needed to see the blood of those brave men to realize the brutality of the siege and of the besieger.
Nevertheless, it is our duty to finish what the brave men and women of the Freedom Flotilla and the campaigns that preceded it. It is time to brieak the siege.
More ships head to Gaza from Iran
It will also send a plane carrying 30 tonnes of medical equipment to Egypt for onward delivery to Gaza.
Red Crescent director for international affairs Abdolrauf Adibzadeh told Iranian media that two ships would leave for Gaza this week, followed at a later date by a third vessel.
The first two ships will head to Gaza in coordination with the Turkish government.
Of the two ships, "one will carry 70 aid workers such as nurses and medics and the other will have foodstuffs and medicines," Adibzadeh was quoted as saying on the state television website.
"The (two) ships will be sent to Gaza by end of this week," Adibzadeh told the state IRNA news agency.
The news agency said the third vessel would be equipped with an onboard operating theatre and would head for the Palestinian territory at a later date.
Adibzadeh said the Red Crescent has called for Iranian volunteers to act as relief workers and accompany the first two vessels.
"Volunteers who want to go to Gaza and help the oppressed people of occupied Palestine can refer to the Red Crescent website and register," he said.
He said an aid plane would "leave in a short time for Egypt in coordination with the Egyptian Red Crescent."
The Iranian Red Crescent had previously sent an aid ship carrying food and medicines to Gaza in December 2008 but it was prevented from reaching the territory by the Israeli navy.
'Protest movement against the blockade'
Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson Ramin Mehmanparast said such aid ships were symbols of the "protest movement against the blockade."
"If this symbolic campaign continues, it will result in the surrender of the Zionist regime, which will certainly be one of its biggest defeats," the state television website quoted him as saying.
The decision to send new aid to Gaza comes hot on the heels of a report that Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards had expressed readiness to escort aid flotillas to Gaza.
"If the respected leader of the revolution (supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei) gives an order in this regard, the Revolutionary Guards' naval forces will take a practical step using their capability and equipment to escort flotillas to Gaza," Khamenei's aide in the Guards' naval wing, Ali Shirazi, told the Mehr news agency on Sunday.
It was unclear, however, how the Guards would escort the flotillas as their naval wing is largely made up of speed boats and light vessels.
Last week's Israeli commando raid on an aid flotilla headed for Gaza, in which nine pro-Palestinian activitists died, has sparked outrage across the political spectrum in Iran.
Blaming the United States, Britain and France for the deadly raid, Khamenei called for the prosecution of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Ehud Barak.
In a message issued on Tuesday, Iran's supreme leader called on the international community to end the Israeli blocakde.
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad too lashed out at Israel, demanding that it face "political sanctions" for the raid.
The animosity between Iran and its regional archfoe has only worsened under Ahmadinejad, with top Guards commanders repeatedly boasting that the elite force has missiles capable of reaching any target in Israel.
In turn, Israel, which has the Middle East's sole if undeclared nuclear arsenal, has refused to rule out a resort to military action against Iran to prevent it aquiring a nuclear weapons capability.
Iran denies any such ambition.
George Galloway announces new convoys to break the siege of Gaza
Viva Palestina founder George Galloway, speaking to a crowd of around 20,000 protesting outside the Israeli embassy in London, revealed the latest plan to bring about the end of the siege on Gaza.
Two simultaneous convoys – one by land the other by sea – will set forth on SUNDAY 12 SEPTEMBER bound for Gaza. Viva Palestina, the International Committee to break the Siege on Gaza and any allies who will join us will organize the two convoys.
The land convoy will leave from London and travel across Europe to Turkey, Syria and ultimately through the Rafah Gate into Gaza. Cooperation will be offered and sought with all relevant governments and agencies. It is expected the convoy will pick up vehicles and volunteers in each country through which it passes. The target is to enter Gaza with 500 vehicles.
The sea convoy will travel around the Mediterranean gathering ships, cargo, volunteers from each country. The target is to enter Gaza with 60 ships.
The aim will be to arrive on Gaza's frontiers at the same time. And to enter with the world's largest ever aid convoys. And to thereby render the siege null and void.
Please get in touch if you need further information. Please also sign up to the Viva Palestina mailing list - http://vivapalestina.org/alert.htm
Please pass this on to everyone you think might be interested in supporting the new convoy.
The Sea blockade of Gaza was temporary 15 years ago
interim, five-year agreement signed by the Palestinian Authority in 1995 –
probably under duress – but still in force, allowing the Israelis “to
weave a tangled web of security zoning in Gaza's coastal waters” and leaving
them in charge offshore, where there is a massive gas field.I must have got it all wrong.
I thought the first duty of a government was to protect its citizens from assault while going about their lawful business.
"There is no greater priority, no more important responsibility than the safety of all our citizens..." Didn't our previous prime minister, Gordon Brown, say so?
To my way of thinking, that means protecting from armed thugs any British subjects sailing peacefully and lawfully on the high seas. The Israelis advertised their threats. The government had plenty of warning. So where was the Royal Navy?
“The Israelis advertised their threats. The government had plenty of warning. So where was the Royal Navy?”
Probably horsing around in the Gulf protecting foreigners who would rather be left alone. Or chasing pirates along the Somali coast. Or cruising the Caribbean showing the flag. Brown had also promised Royal Navy ships to thwart arms smuggling into Gaza, so if the flotilla was suspected of carrying arms you’d think jolly Jack Tar would be have been on hand in a flash.
It seems our ships were just too busy on other chores like protecting Iraqis and Afghans to bother defending our own people from being murdered or abducted on their way through the Mediterranean on a noble humanitarian mission.
So the new prime minister, David Cameron, fails his first test.
His foreign secretary, William Hague, told the House of Commons that he would stress to the Israeli government the need for restraint, “given that their actions appear to have gone beyond what was warranted or proportionate. We need to know whether more could have been done to minimize the risks, or to reduce the number of deaths and injuries."
Meaning that the assault would have been OK if less blood on the decks?
He also wanted the Israelis to observe UN Resolution 1860, which calls for “sustained delivery of humanitarian aid” and calls on states “to alleviate the humanitarian and economic situation”. The fact that it has not happened, he said, was "a tragedy".
More than a tragedy – it’s a dereliction of duty on the part of Britain and the rest of the international community. Their cowardice and moral bankruptcy has allowed Israel to defy dozens of other UN Resolutions.
"We will therefore continue to press the Israeli government to lift the closure of Gaza,” said Hague, “and plan early discussions with Israel as well as with our other international partners about what more can be done to ensure an unfettered flow of aid while also ensuring that aid reaches those who need it and is not abused".
Press away! There is only one way to “alleviate” the situation and that’s for the world’s navies to land supplies on Gaza’s beach.
Hague ducks and weaves
Sir Gerald Kaufman, the forthright Jewish MP, pointed out that any one of the 37 UK citizens might have been killed when the Israelis “committed a war crime of piracy in international waters, kidnapping and murder – and all in pursuit of upholding an illegal blockade on Gaza that amounts to collective punishment...” He asked Mr Hague for his assurance that further steps would be taken if the Israelis failed to comply with the modest request that had been made.
But Hague sidestepped, saying: "It is our strong advice to British nationals, as it has been in the past and will be in the future, not to travel to Gaza – let me make that absolutely clear – as they would be going into a dangerous situation, but it is absolutely wrong to maintain the blockade."
“Mr Hague has been a Friend of Israel since his school days. Prime Minister David Cameron reminded MPs that he too counted himself a Friend of Israel. Why on earth do they and so many others in government champion a racist, rogue state?"
By advising us not to travel – now and in the future – and failing to take action to break the illegal blockade, he chickens out and hands the Israelis an amazing victory. They of course don't want witnesses crawling all over their major crime scene.
Jeremy Corbyn asked if it wasn’t time for sanctions such as revoking the EU-Israel trade agreement. Hague replied that he did not think imposing sanctions was the right policy. So no consequences.
Frank Dobson suggested that Britain and the other European members of NATO should give naval protection if another flotilla sets off for Gaza, with the Royal Navy reverting to its traditional role of protecting the freedom of the seas. Hague dismissed this too.
Does this mean that, after all that’s happened, we’re going to abandon the Rachel Corrie to her fate? She was too late to join the main flotilla and is steaming towards Gaza independently and due to reach Israel’s killing zone any day.
Mr Hague has been a Friend of Israel since his school days. Prime Minister David Cameron reminded MPs that he too counted himself a Friend of Israel. Why on earth do they and so many others in government champion a racist, rogue state? Why are they friends of Israel and not Palestine, not Lebanon, not Syria, not Iran? Why are they supportive of the Israeli government, who are proven terrorists, but hateful towards the democratically elected government of Gaza?
Should such people have their hands on the levers of power in Britain? In this new era of sleaze-free politics they owe us an explanation.
A very bad smell
Which brings us to the issue that few people seem to have questioned – Israel’s sea blockade and its legality. I've heard Israel's apologists say the answer is to allow humanitarian supplies in by road through Israeli-controlled crossings while maintaining the blockade, and the US would probably agree to that.
Like everything else Israel does, and America supports, you have to look for the ulterior motive. Why did the belligerent party set up the blockade in the first place?
One reason is Gaza's marine gas field, which lies 25 to 30 km offshore. It is estimated to hold 1 trillion cubic feet of gas worth around 4 billion US dollars in revenue. It would last 15 years and Israel wants it, so nobody talks about it.
In 2005, at the time of Israel's “disengagement” from the Gaza Strip, the Palestinians decided to drop plans to sell their gas to Israel and talked with Egypt instead. The position changed again when Tony Blair, Israel's faithful dogsbody and special envoy of the Quartet, personally intervened on Israel's behalf.
“Their [the Israelis’] plan ... is to get their hands on Palestine’s precious energy resource in much the same way as they stole Palestine's water.”
How laughable. This is the same Israel that's starving Gazans into submission, blitzing them in their prison-home and trashing their economy. The same Israel that continues to murder and imprison whomsoever it wishes and steal whatever it wants. The same Israel that has no regard for international law or human rights. The same Israel that has blocked the flow of Palestinian tax and customs revenues, humanitarian aid and hospital supplies. The same Israel that will not recognize Palestine or its right of democratic self-determination.
Nobody in the Middle East believes that an assurance or guarantee by Israel is worth the paper it's written on, especially in this case where it mounted a challenge to Palestine's right to own and control the gas field, and lost. Their plan, apparently, is to get their hands on Palestine’s precious energy resource in much the same way as they stole Palestine's water. Israel would siphon off the gas in ever-increasing quantities while keeping the Palestinians in a state of bankruptcy and unable to use their share. Alternatively they'll provoke endless “security” alerts, as is their style, and block the pipeline anytime they choose as a collective punishment.
If Gaza's gas is brought ashore in Israel, how can Palestinians benefit in terms of business contracts and job opportunities?
Would they ever get a whiff of their own gas?
Unfortunately, an interim agreement signed in 1995 allowed the Israelis to weave a tangled web of security zoning in Gaza's coastal waters, leaving Israel in charge and dictating what happens offshore and who comes and goes.”
Unfortunately, an interim agreement signed in 1995 allowed the Israelis to weave a tangled web of security zoning in Gaza's coastal waters, leaving Israel in charge and dictating what happens offshore and who comes and goes. It’s the sort of agreement no Palestinian would have signed unless under extreme duress.
It allowed fishing boats from Gaza to go 20 nautical miles from the coastline, but after Israel’s so-called “disengagement” and the capture of Corporal Shalit, Israel unilaterally reduced the fishing area to three miles.
Being “interim”, these restrictions were not expected to last beyond 1999. But they are still in force. Why?
The nasty whiff is not just gas. So here’s an immediate and urgent task for the international community. It must untangle this sea blockade and restore to Palestine free unfettered use of its territorial waters.
As for the land blockade, if it is “wrong”, as Mr Hague says, and illegal as everyone else believes, it has been wrong and illegal for four years. It is not enough to say it must end. Action must be taken to bring it to an end.
Hague was no help in opposition. Now he’s in power, he is off to a poor start. The message to him and his fellow dining room loafers in the EU is clear: Cut the cackle and ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING – NOW!















