In a recent headline that will go unnoticed by many, Osama Bin Laden has been cleared of all terrorism charges, which is a standard procedure now that he’s dead and there’s nobody to prosecute.
However what exactly were those charges to begin with? Many would assume 9/11. After all we were told that Bin Laden orchestrated the September 11th attacks and that we needed to invade Afghanistan to find him.
As reported by the Daily Mail:
Bin Laden was indicted back in 1998 in the Southern District of New York for his role in the al Qaeda attack on the U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya, which killed more than 200 people, including a dozen Americans.
The indictment was later revised to charge bin Laden in the dual bombings of two American embassies in East Africa that killed 224 on August 7, 1998, and in the suicide attack on the USS Cole in 2000. None of the charges involved the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
That’s right, the Al Qaeda mastermind that has been plastered all over the news for the past decade as having orchestrated 9/11, was never actually charged. Why? Because there is absolutely no evidence that he was involved.
Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI; when asked why there was no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s FBI Most Wanted web page, stated, “…the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.” [1]
In fact Bin Laden openly denied carrying out the attacks. As noted by CNN at the time:
“The U.S. government has consistently blamed me for being behind every occasion its enemies attack it.
“I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to have been planned by people for personal reasons,” bin Laden’s statement said.
“I have been living in the Islamic emirate of Afghanistan and following its leaders’ rules. The current leader does not allow me to exercise such operations,” bin Laden said.
Of course the globalists and Neocons had a preplanned war to fight so they had to link Bin Laden to 9/11 some how. Their solution? Lie!
Remember the Bin Laden confession tape, heralded by the establishment as proof? It was deliberately mistranslated.
Professor Gernot Rotter, scholar of Islamic and Arabic Studies explains: “Regardless of the question if bin Laden personally was actively involved in the organization of the attacks or not: This tape is of such poor quality that many passages are unintelligible. And those that are intelligible have often been taken out of context, so that you can’t use that as evidence…The American translators who listened to the tape and transcribed it obviously added things that they wanted to hear in many places. Things that can’t be heard – never mind how often you listen to it.” [2]
The invasion of Afghanistan was baseless and illegal. Western governments presented no evidence that those who were behind the attacks were hiding in the region.
The Taliban were more than happy to hand over Bin Laden, as long as they were provided proof and evidence of his whereabouts. Bush refused and invaded anyway. [3]
Whether Bin Laden was already dead before the alleged raid in Pakistan, as most of the evidence suggests, is irrelevant to this point. The US had to assassinate him or pretend to, because if they had theoretically brought him to trial, he’d have walked away free from the 9/11 charge. There was no 9/11 charge to begin with.
This would have destroyed the official fairy tail and sent millions of people down the rabbit hole to discover the attacks were orchestrated, not by a bearded man in a cave, but by elements within the US government and international intelligence agencies, to mount an imperialist assault on the Middle-East.
Of course that isn’t to say Bin Laden wasn’t a fundamentalist nut-job that at times helped fund terrorism, but he was also a pawn of the CIA, who also happens to fund terrorism…..a lot!
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!
0 Have Your Say!:
Post a Comment