Wednesday, February 9

The big bluff: false claims to the Holy Land

Stained glass at St John the Baptist's Anglica...Image via Wikipedia

Paul J. Balles explains why the 60 million right-wing Christians in the USA who expect a “second coming” of Jesus Christ into the Holy Land are in for a shock.

"That's the Holy Land!" exclaimed a Palestinian refugee, adding: "The Holy Land belongs to everyone! It doesn't belong exclusively to the Jews!"

The machinery was switched on for the usurpation of the Holy Land at the direction of the Zionist Conference in Switzerland 1897.
 Theodor Herzl wrote in his diary (1 September 1897):
Were I to sum up the Basle Congress in a word – which I shall guard against pronouncing publicly – it would be this: at Basle I founded the Jewish state. If I said this out loud today l would be greeted by universal laughter. In five years perhaps, and certainly in 50 years, everyone will perceive it.
"The Zionists and their co-religionists rule these United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country… There wasn't one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land. Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. And yet they come to the Christians and ask to help repatriate God's Chosen People to their Promised Land."
Benjamin Freedman, anti-Zionist Jew
Benjamin Freedman, an anti-Zionist Jew, said in 1961: ”The Zionists and their co-religionists rule these United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country."

Freedman went on to explain that the Eastern European Jews who form 92 per cent of the world's population of so-called Jews were originally Khazars, a Mongoloid race forced out of Asia into Eastern Europe. They were Pagans who converted to the Talmudic faith.


To quote Freedman further: "There wasn't one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land. Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. And yet they come to the Christians and ask to help repatriate God's Chosen People to their Promised Land."


"Could there be a bigger lie than that?" Freedman asks. "Because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business, and because they have the ministers in the pulpit and the politicians on the soapboxes talking the same language, it is not too surprising that you believe that lie."


The Pharisees and other scribes commenced compiling the Talmud in 375A.D. and later in Babylon in 500A.D. It is not based on spiritual faith but on laws, rules and tactics.


Israel Shahak, former professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, was very critical of the Talmud, saying:

It must be admitted that the Talmud and Talmudic literature contain very offensive statements directed specifically against Christianity.
For example, in addition to a series of scurrilous sexual allegations against Jesus, the Talmud states that his punishment in hell is to be immersed in boiling excrement…
Shahak observes that Christians believe the Old Testament has the same central place and legal authority in Judaism that the Bible has for Christians.

"This is not the case, because the interpretation of the sacred texts is rigidly fixed by the Talmud rather than the Bible itself."


In the USA today, an estimated 60 million of the Christian right support not only the creation of Talmudic Israel, but the expansion of that state as well. Their belief is that when Israel is established it will bring about the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.


There is a disconnect here because Christ's message was of a spiritual life whereas the Talmudists believe that when their messiah comes he will resurrect all the Jewish dead. It has been suggested that the Jewish cemetery in Jerusalem is the largest in the world because that is where the resurrection will commence.


Oswald Refeisen, a Polish Jew, voluntarily converted to Catholicism, eventually becoming Father Daniel of the Carmelite Order. He immigrated to Israel in 1958. As he had a Jewish mother and considered himself a Jew, he applied for the status of an
 oleh (aliyah) under the Law of Return.

When his request was denied, he took his case to the Supreme Court where a four-to-one majority decided that Father Daniel was not a Jew for the purpose of the Law of Return.


Stilberg, the presiding judge said: "A Jew who becomes a Christian cannot be called a Jew."


If the 60 million Christian right expect a Second Coming of Jesus Christ into the Holy Land, they are in for a shock. His Jewish mother would not be good enough to get Him residency.


The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this Blog!
Enhanced by Zemanta
Share:

0 Have Your Say!:

Post a Comment