This book challenges whether diplomatic and military support for Israel is in the United States' best interests and it is sparking fresh debate on Washington's role in the Middle East.
The Israel Lobby And U.S Foreign Policy is written by two of the United States' most influential political science professors. The book is now on bookshelves and promises to break the taboo on the subject.
Written by John Mearsheimer from the University of Chicago and Stephen Walt from Harvard, the book follows an article they published last year that stirred impassioned debate by setting out a similar position.
Their thesis is that US endorsement of Israel is not fully explained by strategic or moral reasons, but by the pressure exerted by Jewish lobbyists, Christian fundamentalists and neo-conservatives with Zionist sympathies.
The result, according to the book, is an unbalanced US foreign policy in the Middle East, the US invasion of Iraq, the threat of war with Iran or Syria and a fragile security situation for the entire Western world.
"Israel is not the strategic asset to the United States that many claim. Israel may have been a strategic asset during the Cold War, but it has become a growing liability now that the Cold War is over," the authors said.
"Unconditional support for Israel has reinforced anti-Americanism around the world, helped fuel America's terrorism problem, and strained relations with other key allies in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia," they added.
According to the two writers, "backing Israel's harsh treatment of the Palestinians has reinforced Anti-Americanism around the world and almost certainly helped the extremes recruit new followers."
Mearsheimer and Walt highlight the three billion dollars in US economic and military aid that Israel receives every year -- more than any other country.
They also point to Washington's diplomatic support: between 1972 and 2006, the United States vetoed 42 United Nations Security Council resolutions that were critical of Israel, while watering down many others under threat of veto.
In the conclusion of their book, Mearsheimer and Walt say that the United States must change its policy towards Israel.
"The United States would be a better ally if its leaders could make support for Israel more conditional and if they could give their Israeli counterparts more candid advice without facing a backlash from the Israel lobby."
With just over a year until the 2008 US presidential election, however, they said the issue was unlikely to even enter the debate.
"Regrettably, no. The one issue on which there will be virtually no debate is the question of whether the United States should continue to give Israel unconditional backing," they said.
For More information see Israel Lobby And Us Foreign Policy
0 Have Your Say!:
Post a Comment